Dimitri Abrahamsson
banner
dimiabrams.bsky.social
Dimitri Abrahamsson
@dimiabrams.bsky.social
Chemistry and Computer Science nerd | Assistant Professor at UCSF | All things mass spectrometry and exposome
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
Bisphenols, pesticides, phthalates, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) chemicals in the global food system are linked to a host of health problems. cen.acs.org/food/food-in... #chemsky 🧪
Chemicals in food system cause nearly $3 trillion in annual damage: Report
Trillions are spent on the environmental and health impacts, such as treating diseases linked to certain chemicals and removing them from the water supply
cen.acs.org
December 26, 2025 at 10:14 AM
If the Trump administration understands the dangers of poisoning the public with fentanyl, then they must also understand the dangers of poisoning people with toxic chemicals. This type of logic cuts both ways.
www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
DESIGNATING FENTANYL AS A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1.  Purpose and
www.whitehouse.gov
December 16, 2025 at 9:22 PM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
You can't make America healthy if you weaken rules designed to protect people from toxic chemicals and pollution.

EPA needs to stop working for polluters and start protecting health.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/13/climate/maha-moms-epa-lee-zeldin.html
MAHA Moms Are Angry at the E.P.A. Lee Zeldin Is Trying to Win Them Back.
A split is emerging within Trump’s base as health activists accuse Mr. Zeldin of leading the agency to prioritize chemical industry interests over public health.
www.nytimes.com
December 15, 2025 at 5:35 PM
Happy Hanukkah!
December 15, 2025 at 3:32 AM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
Draft legislation is circulating in Congress right now that weakens the Toxic Substances Control Act. It's what the chemical lobby has spent millions of dollars trying to achieve - and if they get what they want, more people will be exposed to more harmful chemicals and more will get sick.
December 9, 2025 at 5:48 PM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
San Francisco is taking on ultra-processed food companies for "using deceptive marketing techniques to target children ... to consume their products while knowing that overconsumption of the foods could lead to poor health outcomes..." #ultraprocessedfood

abc7news.com/post/san-fra...
San Francisco files 1st-of-its-kind lawsuit against largest ultraprocessed food manufacturers
Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, General Mills, Kellogg, and Kraft Heinz are some of the 10 major corporations being sued by San Francisco, which is arguing they unfairly marketed ultraprocessed foods and products...
abc7news.com
December 4, 2025 at 9:06 PM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
Objective truths are still out there. It’s just harder than ever to know what they look like.

What’s Up With That?

[StarTalk video: 15min]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4I_...
How to Tell What’s Real Online
YouTube video by StarTalk
www.youtube.com
December 4, 2025 at 12:21 PM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
"This is what corporate capture looks like." - Dimitri Abrahamsson

EPA is supposed to protect people from toxic chemicals like D4, not give them a pass.
At EPA’s D4 meeting today:
- Most reviewers industry affiliated
- Most EPA scientists in sync with industry
- EU, UK, Canada: “D4 very persistent and very bioaccumulatative”
- EPA: “maybe persistent but not bioaccumulative”
This is what corporate capture looks like
www.youtube.com/live/eTZ9rjV...
Day 1 12/02 - Peer Review of the Draft Risk Evaluation for Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4)
YouTube video by uvideoonline
www.youtube.com
December 3, 2025 at 7:06 PM
At EPA’s D4 meeting today:
- Most reviewers industry affiliated
- Most EPA scientists in sync with industry
- EU, UK, Canada: “D4 very persistent and very bioaccumulatative”
- EPA: “maybe persistent but not bioaccumulative”
This is what corporate capture looks like
www.youtube.com/live/eTZ9rjV...
Day 1 12/02 - Peer Review of the Draft Risk Evaluation for Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4)
YouTube video by uvideoonline
www.youtube.com
December 3, 2025 at 2:54 AM
Never forget.
What terrorism did.
Never forget.
Those who perished.
Those who ran towards danger to help.
September 11, 2025 at 4:55 PM
I'm excited to share our new scientific adventure with Benny Chefetz, Evyatar Ben Mordechay, and Moshe Shenker to study the metabolism of pharmaceuticals in plants and humans. We’re grateful to BSF for their support and excited to deepen the collaboration between UCSF and HUJI through this research.
August 10, 2025 at 6:13 AM
We thank the Reviewers for their helpful suggestions
June 13, 2025 at 4:19 AM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
👇My interview in @newscientist.com on how corporations' control your health - and what we can do about it.

Plus, I have weird blue hair in the illustration, so it is worth checking out just to see that.

www.newscientist.com/article/2481...
Do corporations actually have more control over your health than you?
From the food on supermarket shelves to the air we breathe, large companies exert a greater impact on our health than we might realise, argues health scientist Tracey Woodruff
www.newscientist.com
June 9, 2025 at 4:26 PM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
"You can’t protect children from harmful chemicals while gutting EPA, cutting funding to NIEHS, and rolling back or eliminating environmental rules that protect people from toxic exposures." @traceywoodruff.bsky.social
Statement on Make America Healthy Again Commission report
Dr. Tracey J. Woodruff, PhD, professor and director of the Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment and the Center to End Corporate Harm at UCSF issued the following statement upon release o...
prheucsf.blog
May 23, 2025 at 5:20 PM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
Now we know that if a study is funded by the meat industry, it is 4 times more likely to conclude that red meat has positive or benign effects on cardiovascular disease risk. NIH should fund nutrition scientists so they can stop working for the food industry. ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S000...
Industry study sponsorship and conflicts of interest on the effect of unprocessed red meat on cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review of clinical trials
Experimental research on the link between unprocessed red meat and cardiovascular disease risk is inconsistent and may differ according to the financial interests of red meat industry sponsors.
ajcn.nutrition.org
May 21, 2025 at 8:07 PM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
"Eliminating the science will not make the harms go away." @traceywoodruff.bsky.social @epw.senate.gov
May 21, 2025 at 7:48 PM
Excellent speech by @traceywoodruff.bsky.social If the administration is serious about making America healthy they need to fund environmental research. It is science fiction to think that you can cut 55% of EPA’s budget and expect people’s health to improve.
www.youtube.com/live/3l-bOsI...
Toxic Priorities: How Trump’s EPA Puts Polluters Over People
YouTube video by Senate Environment & Public Works Committee
www.youtube.com
May 21, 2025 at 7:52 PM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
Our latest manuscript in Environmental Science & Technology is now available, where we detail the implementation of a #nontarget method to help identify novel candidate organic tracers that may help improve estimates of children's dust ingestion rates.

pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10....
May 20, 2025 at 2:49 PM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
The 80-year recipe stoking America’s Prosperity:

1) Free-market capital investments in brilliant ideas…
2) enabled by Engineering Innovations…
3) based on Science Research in Universities…
4) funded by Grants from the US Government.

It’s time more people understood this.
May 17, 2025 at 1:36 PM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
Dear Republicans,

Cutting science budgets has not historically been a Republican thing. For example, Lincoln created the National Academy of Sciences. Eisenhower's term increased the science budget 366%. Gerald Ford, +15%; George H. W. Bush, +30%; George W. Bush, +54%.

Just sayin’.
May 19, 2025 at 12:10 PM
Cutting the budget of NASA by 50% will not only have 0 impact on the federal budget, it will also put America in the back seat, while other countries are taking the wheel. The same applies to EPA and NOAA; all three agencies founded by Republican Presidents.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGow...
Addressing the NASA Budget Cuts
YouTube video by StarTalk
www.youtube.com
May 8, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
They are making it easier for polluters to pollute. More air pollution means more asthma, more cardiovascular and respiratory disease, more cancer, and worse pregnancy outcomes.

www.washingtonpost.com/climate-envi...
Senate overturns EPA rule on seven highly toxic air pollutants
If also passed by the House as expected, the action will be the first time Congress has weakened protections under the Clean Air Act.
www.washingtonpost.com
May 2, 2025 at 3:01 PM
I agree. I believe RFK Jr and the MAHA movement genuinely want to improve public health, but it’s not going to work if on the one hand we are banning food dyes, while on the other we are allowing manufacturers to release toxic chemicals in the environment. At best, this will be a fruitless endeavor.
Thanks for this. 4 sure there are many many toxic chemicals in food, and water and air. I agree about wanting to control our environment. But I also know that unless the government does its job - we will still be exposed to toxic chemicals no matter what.
right now that's not looking so good
The MAHA movement is surging, and changing the conversation around chemical risks. I wrote about the overlaps -- and some stark differences -- between MAHA and the environmental movement.

www.washingtonpost.com/climate-envi...
April 25, 2025 at 1:04 AM
Reposted by Dimitri Abrahamsson
New Paper Alert! UC Irvine researchers used tobacco industry documents to determine whether the US Smokeless Tobacco Industry used #BigTobacco strategies to manipulate research on health risks. @ucirvine.bsky.social
#ScienceIntegrity #archives
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
Did the United States smokeless tobacco industry use cigarette industry strategies to sponsor and manipulate research?
Background and aim The cigarette industry in the United States (US) laid the foundation for sponsoring research to improve public relations and defend against product liability cases. Fewer threats ...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
March 21, 2025 at 7:04 PM