@danielvf.bsky.social
50% savings on dev time
50% savings on verification expenses
90% of bugs never exist, ('cause bugs are square of your code)
How? This is my stupid trick:
- Cut 1/2 of the code in the requirements phase.
- Simplify out 1/3 of the remaining code via better abstractions during development.
50% savings on verification expenses
90% of bugs never exist, ('cause bugs are square of your code)
How? This is my stupid trick:
- Cut 1/2 of the code in the requirements phase.
- Simplify out 1/3 of the remaining code via better abstractions during development.
November 25, 2024 at 10:42 PM
50% savings on dev time
50% savings on verification expenses
90% of bugs never exist, ('cause bugs are square of your code)
How? This is my stupid trick:
- Cut 1/2 of the code in the requirements phase.
- Simplify out 1/3 of the remaining code via better abstractions during development.
50% savings on verification expenses
90% of bugs never exist, ('cause bugs are square of your code)
How? This is my stupid trick:
- Cut 1/2 of the code in the requirements phase.
- Simplify out 1/3 of the remaining code via better abstractions during development.