Working on a book on topos theory
Anyone have experience booking spaces around NYC for that purpose? I'm happy to put my money down to book rooms somewhere assuming it's feasible etc.
Anyone have experience booking spaces around NYC for that purpose? I'm happy to put my money down to book rooms somewhere assuming it's feasible etc.
————————
A -> B ∨ A -> C
fails constructively much like:
∀ (B[x] ∨ C[x])
————————
∀ (B[x]) ∨ ∀ (C[x])
fails classically and that gives a good sense of why the translation into modal logic is sensible / how constructive logic is intrinsically a logic of “types”
————————
A -> B ∨ A -> C
fails constructively much like:
∀ (B[x] ∨ C[x])
————————
∀ (B[x]) ∨ ∀ (C[x])
fails classically and that gives a good sense of why the translation into modal logic is sensible / how constructive logic is intrinsically a logic of “types”
So it's a small relief that the rest of the world is actually getting remarkable stuff done with energy. We just passed a huge milestone globally!
Now back to work on America.
billmckibben.substack.com/p/something-...
So it's a small relief that the rest of the world is actually getting remarkable stuff done with energy. We just passed a huge milestone globally!
Now back to work on America.
billmckibben.substack.com/p/something-...
liberal/realist: the correct unit of analysis is the individual/gene/neuron
communitarian/anti-realist: let us humble ourselves before irreducible complexity
marxist/structuralist: the unity of opposites
liberal/realist: the correct unit of analysis is the individual/gene/neuron
communitarian/anti-realist: let us humble ourselves before irreducible complexity
marxist/structuralist: the unity of opposites