bee150.bsky.social
@bee150.bsky.social
4) Then, three-quarters of the states—38 out of 50—would need to ratify it. Given the gravity of altering presidential accountability, such an effort would demand immense political consensus and would likely involve years of national debate. But still worth considering in next govt, no?
February 10, 2026 at 7:36 PM
3) To establish a recall-like mechanism at the federal level, you’d need to amend the U.S. Constitution. Congress would have to propose an amendment, which requires a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate. Or two-thirds of state legislatures could call for a constitutional convention.
February 10, 2026 at 7:34 PM
2) A recall in California starts with a petition. A group of citizens can initiate recall by filing a notice. They gather a required number of signatures within a set timeframe. Then a recall election is scheduled. Voters decide whether to remove the official and, if so, who should replace them.
February 10, 2026 at 7:33 PM
1)In California & some other states, voters can petition to remove a governor (or other officials) before their term ends if enough signatures are gathered. I have been wondering why our federal government can't work this way in the face of corruption to hold elected officials accountable mid-term.
February 10, 2026 at 7:30 PM
Reposted
Rep. Delia Ramirez to DHS officials: "I have as much respect for you as I do for the last white men who put on masks to terrorize communities of color. I have no respect for the inheritors of the Klanhood and the slave patrol. Those activities were criminal and so are yours."
February 10, 2026 at 5:11 PM
Reposted
Concentration camps:

"I saw people lying in feces, throwing up, and sleeping in urine."
Former ICE Facility Worker 'saw people laying in feces' at Baltimore Detention Center
Whistleblower provides internal documents alleging severe overcrowding, mistreatment months before viral video sparked national outrage
www.wusa9.com
February 8, 2026 at 11:21 PM
Reposted
January 25, 2026 at 8:21 PM
Reposted
“Trump does not respond to outrage. He responds to markets.”

@profgalloway.com makes the case for a national economic strike.
January 25, 2026 at 10:35 PM
💯 Especially as funds are withheld from California from the federal government. Like the gerrymandering tit for tat, why can't we withhold State dollars unless federal dollars continue to flow?
January 10, 2026 at 6:11 PM
Supporting women's rights is not transphobic. You can both support trans rights and believe biologically born women have different heights/bodies/disadvantages in sports that should be protected.
March 8, 2025 at 1:53 AM