It takes me ages to write a post in my blog, but every now and then I do manage to complete one.
In this case, a book review.
TL;DR - go and read (listening to the audiobook works too)

always-fearful.blogspot.com/2024/05/book...

I know this is a marketing click-bait, but it still annoys me.
www.cigniti.com/blog/37-soft...

The underlying assumption is that if a bug manifests, then there wasn't good enough testing.
I believe even a testing vendor should be able to justify their work without promoting such misconceptions.

So, I've just finished submitting talks for @agiletdzone.bsky.social, and boy, was this the talk submission with the most friction I've done so far.
I'm not sure why submitting a video was mandatory (strongly recommended?) this year, but I sure hope it won't be next year.

So, lately I'm thinking about ways to track our features' test coverage. This has also led me to think about the concept of traceability and its prevalence in some areas of testing.
So I wrote about it a bit.
always-fearful.blogspot.com/2024/01/the-...

Say, people, is there a good way to collaborate on mind maps over time? Ideally something that can be checked into git or have some version control.

Microsoft may have found a way to beat google's search by embedding chatGPT into windows (dubbed "copilot in windows" or something like it).
Just asked it to help me choose a unit test framework for C++ (decided to play with it for the new AdventOfCode), and while overly verbose, it's helpful