#Gene@2024
LightNews LightNews
japanauthor.bsky.social
PAUL CAPONIGRO (1932-2024)
Hiei-San, Kyoto.
Being auctioned as part of the Gene Hackman estate.
Strange how one of the best temple images ever seen does not involve the usual AI or over processed slop posted on social media.
November 12, 2025 at 5:35 AM
againstcentrism.bsky.social
Generating consent for genocide: The BBC’s complicity in Israel’s crimes in Palestine and Lebanon

The BBC is deceiving the British public and using its position to manufacture consent for Israel's genocidal assault in Palestine and Lebanon.

Sharaiz Chaudhry

mondoweiss.net/2024/10/gene...
Generating consent for genocide: The BBC’s complicity in Israel’s crimes in Palestine and Lebanon
The BBC is deceiving the British public and using its position to manufacture consent for Israel’s genocidal assault in Palestine and Lebanon.
mondoweiss.net
November 10, 2025 at 10:35 PM
ecseq.bsky.social
🚀 In SaxoCell Phase 2, ecSeq delivers NGS pipelines and software solutions to advance gene and cell therapeutics. 🧬 Read more: www.ecseq.com/blog/2024/ecS... #NGS #Bioinformatics #PrecisionMedicine #SaxoCell
November 10, 2025 at 10:30 AM
enaracg.bsky.social
It breathes air, survives buried in mud for months, and carries a genome that’s still growing after 100 million years. Meet Lepidosiren, the animal with the largest genome known and find out what retrotransposons and gene silencing have to do with it.
mappingignorance.org/2024/09/18/t...
Lepidosiren contains 30 times the size of the human genome.
The genomic DNA of Lepidosiren contains 91 billion base pairs, this is 30 times the size of the human genome.
mappingignorance.org
November 10, 2025 at 7:05 AM
ameburger.bsky.social
par contre ça me tue de rire que mes tomes 1 et 2 de Gene Bride achetés en mars 2024 sont déjà jaunis comme si ils dataient d'il y a 10 ans, le papier Glénat vraiment...
November 8, 2025 at 5:10 PM
edzitron.com
In an analysis of OpenAI's costs, revenues and funding from 2023 to 1H 2025, it raised $28.6bn in cash ($10bn rev included), and had $13.7bn in cash losses.

Reports say OpenAI ended 1H 2025 with $9.6bn. It should have $14.9bn in cash. There's a $4.1bn+ hole.
www.wheresyoured.at/where-is-ope...
A Brief History of OpenAI’s Revenues and Costs If there are other articles reporting OpenAI's revenues or costs, please do get in touch. But I don't think anybody has ever done a full run-down. Behold! On February 9, 2024, The Financial Times said that “OpenAI’s revenues have surpassed $2bn on an annualised basis,” with the company apparently hitting it “In December 2023,” according to “two people with knowledge of its finances.” There was no mention of any comment related to OpenAI in this article. On June 12, 2024, The Information reported that “OpenAI has more than doubled its annualized revenue to $3.4 billion in the past six months or so, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has told staff.” This amounts to around $283m in revenue a month at the end of calendar year Q2 2024. This appears to be sourced from something that Sam Altman told staff. Curiously, this is the only time I’ve seen OpenAI comment on one of these stories, with “...an OpenAI spokeswoman [saying] the financial details were “inaccurate,” without elaborating.” I have read every single one of these and I cannot find another instance of this happening. This makes me believe, along with other information from sources, that these numbers are particularly accurate. This article also confirms that OpenAI gets a “roughly” 20% revenue share cut from Microsoft selling its models. On July 24, 2024, The Information published that OpenAI “could lose as much as $5 billion” in 2024, “according to an analysis by The Information, based on previously undisclosed internal financial data and people involved in the business.” Spokespeople for Microsoft and OpenAI did not have a comment. On September 27. 2024, the New York Times reported that “OpenAI’s monthly revenue hit $300 million in August…and the company expects about $3.7 billion in annual sales [in 2024],” according to a financial professional’s review of documents. That’s $300m in revenue in the month of August 2024. Details are important. OpenAI declined to comment. On October 9, 2024, The Information reported that “OpenAI burned $340 million in the first half of 2024” and that its “cash burn was lower than previously thought,” based on “OpenAI financial documents viewed by The Information.” These documents also “project [OpenAI’s] total losses between 2023 and 2028 to be $44 billion” not including stock compensation, and, laughably, that OpenAI would “make $14 billion in profit [based on the analysis] in 2029.” OpenAI also, in this document, said that “model training costs could rise sharply in the next couple of years, to as high as $9.5 billion a year in 2026.” This same piece included projections that OpenAI would make $12bn in 2025, $26bn in 2026, $44bn in 2027, $69bn in 2028, and $100bn in 2029. There was no mention of any comment related to OpenAI in this article. On February 21, 2025, The Information reported that OpenAI forecasted that “one-third of [its] revenue growth would come from spending by SoftBank to use OpenAI’s products across its companies,” with SoftBank spending $3bn per year. It took until November 5, 2025 for the joint venture involving this spend to actually form. This is sourced to disclosures by OpenAI to its investors. This piece also asserts that $3bn from SoftBank would get OpenAI to $12.7bn in revenue for 2025. There was no mention of any comment related to OpenAI in this article. In this piece, The Information reports that “...[OpenAI’s] spending on Microsoft-owned data centers should ramp up significantly in the next few years, more than doubling from $13 billion this year to $28 billion in 2028.” On March 26, 2025, Bloomberg reported that OpenAI “expects to more than triple its revenue to $12.7 billion in 2025,” and that it generated “$3.7 billion in annual revenue last year,” according to a person familiar with the matter who “spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal communications. In the piece, Bloomberg states that “OpenAI does not expect to be cash-flow positive until 2029, t… On June 9, 2025, an OpenAI spokesperson told CNBC that it had hit “$10 billion annual recurring revenue,” excluding licensing revenue from OpenAI’s 20% revenue share and “large, one-time deals.” $10bn annualized revenue works out to around $833, a month. This news also revealed that OpenAI had reached $5.5bn in annualized revenue in December 2024, or $458m. I have some fucking questions. Why is OpenAI deliberately excluding that cut? Is it because Microsoft didn’t authorize it? What exactly is the time period that “annualized” covers? What are these “large, one-time deals” and why wouldn’t you include them in revenue? On September 5, 2025, The Information reported that “OpenAI projected its cash burn this year through 2029 will rise even higher than previously thought, to a total of $115 billion.” None of this information is sourced in a way that I can see. It’s the strangest thing. The only mention of anything like that is to say that one thing — that OpenAI would consider renting out servers to other companies — was “according to recent comments by OpenAI executives.” While I can’t speak to how this information got the reporter, it feels like this was OpenAI. There is no mention of asking anyone for comment. Nevertheless, this piece says that: OpenAI’s cash burn would be around $9bn in 2025 (though the copy says $8bn, the “Cash Crunch” graph says $9bn), around $17bn in 2026, around $35bn in 2027, around $47bn in 2028, around $8bn in 2029, and then, inexplicably, have a positive cash flow of $38bn. Huh? The piece also mentions that cash burn would be “more than $10 billion higher” than previous cash burn projections from OpenAI, without linking to or sourcing where they received that information (though it’s potentially part of their source’s info). This piece also vastly increases revenues, saying that OpenAI will make $13bn in revenue in 2025, $30bn in 2026, $60bn in 2027, $100bn in 2028, $145bn in 2029, and $200bn in 2030. On September 10, 2025 — five days after a story saying OpenAI would burn $35bn in 2027 — Oracle and OpenAI announced a $300bn, five-year-long cloud deal. I believe this was intentional as this deal is not reflected in the cash burn above. On September 19, 2025, The Information reported that OpenAI “planned to spend about $100 billion renting backup servers from cloud providers over the next five years,” according to what executives have told shareholders. According to The Information, “including the backup servers, OpenAI is planning to spend about $85 billion a year on server rentals over the next five years, on average, according to the company’s private projections.” Yet deeper in the piece, The Information added that “OpenAI plans to spend $450 billion renting servers through 2030, including $100 billion in backup servers it says are ‘monetizeable’.” There is no mentioned request for comment. On September 29, 2025, The Information reported that OpenAI “generated around $4.3 billion in revenue in the first half of 2025, about 16% more than it generated all of last year, according to financial disclosures to shareholders.” OpenAI “burned $2.5 billion” in the first half of 2025 (assume all following statements are from that time period). OpenAI spent $2bn on sales and marketing. OpenAI spent $6.2bn on research and development, which The Information believes is due to research compute costs. OpenAI “looked on track to meet its full-year revenue projection of $13 billion and $8.5 billion of cash burn.” There is no mentioned request for comment. On October 31, 2025, The Wall Street Journal reported that Microsoft had mentioned in its recent earnings that it had taken a $4.1bn loss on its investment in OpenAI, implying a more than $12bn quarterly loss at the company due to Microsoft’s 32.% stake in that quarter (which has now dropped to 27%). The reason I exhaustively wrote this out is that when you lay it all out, a pattern develops: OpenAI is bullshitting its projec…
November 7, 2025 at 5:35 PM
grompf3.bsky.social
Les propos qui lui sont attribués sont corrects, me semble-t-il.
Le 5 juin 2024, Nathalie Oziol était interrogée par l’administrateur de cette boucle dans sa permanence. Dans une vidéo de l’entretien consultée par Libé, elle déclarait ne «pas être d’accord» pour qu’on dise, comme «le maire de Montpellier», «que c’est un fanatique musulman» qui a tué le professeur Samuel Paty le 16 octobre 2020. https://www.liberation.fr/politique/lassassin-de-samuel-paty-pas-un-fanatique-musulman-la-video-qui-gene-la-deputee-lfi-nathalie-oziol-20251106_6VSOZSYGXVFCDKI6SSPEYGLAIU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Bluesky&at_platform=Bluesky#Echobox=1762413928
November 6, 2025 at 9:58 PM
edzitron.com
This piece is the single-most detailed and thorough analysis of OpenAI's revenue, funding and costs in existence. It is a one-of-a-kind evaluation of a company with conflicting leaks and what I believe is an astonishingly higher burn rate.

edzitronswheresyouredatghostio.outpost.pub/public/promo...
On February 9 2024, The Financial Times said that “OpenAI’s revenues have surpassed $2bn on an annualised basis,” with the company apparently hitting it “In December 2023,” according to “two people with knowledge of its finances.” There was no mention of any comment related to OpenAI in this article. On June 12 2024, The Information reported that “OpenAI has more than doubled its annualized revenue to $3.4 billion in the past six months or so, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has told staff.” This amounts to around $283 million in revenue a month at the end of Calendar Year Q2 2024. This appears to be sourced from something that Sam Altman told staff. Curiously, this is the only time I’ve seen OpenAI comment on one of these stories, with “...an OpenAI spokeswoman [saying] the financial details were “inaccurate,” without elaborating.” I have read every single one of these and I cannot find another instance of this happening. This makes me believe, along with other information from sources, that these numbers are particularly accurate. This article also confirms that OpenAI gets a “roughly” revenue share cut from Microsoft selling its models. On July 24 2024, The Information published that OpenAI “could lose as much as $5 billion” in 2024, “according to an analysis by The Information, based on previously undisclosed internal financial data and people involved in the business.” Spokespeople for Microsoft and OpenAI did not have a comment. On September 27 2024, the New York Times reported that “OpenAI’s monthly revenue hit $300 million in August…and the company expects about $3.7 billion in annual sales [in 2024],” according to a financial professional’s review of documents. That’s $300 million in revenue in the month of August 2024. Details are important. OpenAI declined to comment. On October 9 2024, The Information reported that “OpenAI burned $340 million in the first half of 2024” and that its “cash burn was lower than previously thought,” based on “OpenAI financial document… On March 26 2025, Bloomberg reported that OpenAI “expects to more than triple its revenue to $12.7 billion in 2025,” and that it generated “$3.7 billion in annual revenue last year,” according to a person familiar with the matter who “spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal communications. In the piece, Bloomberg states that “OpenAI does not expect to be cash-flow positive until 2029, the person said, a year when it projects revenue will top $125 billion.” Per Bloomberg’s story, “OpenAI [did] not expect to be cash-flow positive until 2029, the person said, a year when it [projected] revenue will top $125 billion.” OpenAI declined to comment. On June 9 2025, an OpenAI spokesperson told CNBC that it had hit “$10 billion annual recurring revenue,” excluding licensing revenue from OpenAI’s 20% revenue share and “large, one-time deals.” $10 billion annualized revenue works out to around $833 million a month. This news also revealed that OpenAI had been at $5.5 billion in annualized revenue in December 2024, or $458 million. I have some fucking questions. Why is OpenAI deliberately excluding that cut? Is it because Microsoft didn’t authorize it? What exactly is the time period that “annualized” covers? What are these “large, one-time deals” and why wouldn’t you include them in revenue? On September 5 2025, The Information reported that “OpenAI projected its cash burn this year through 2029 will rise even higher than previously thought, to a total of $115 billion.” None of this information is sourced in a way that I can see. It’s the strangest thing. The only mention of anything like that is to say that one thing - that OpenAI would consider renting out servers to other companies - was “according to recent comments by OpenAI executives.” While I can’t speak to how this information got the reporter, it feels like this was OpenAI. There is no mention of asking anyone for comment. Nevertheless, this piece says that: OpenAI’s cash burn would be around $9 billion i… On September 10 - five days after a story saying OpenAI would burn $35 billion in 2027 - Oracle and OpenAI announced a $300 billion, five-year-long cloud deal. I believe this was intentional as this deal is not reflected in the cash burn above. On September 19 2025, The Information reported that OpenAI “planned to spend about $100 billion renting backup servers from cloud providers over the next five years,” according to what executives have told shareholders. According to The Information, “including the backup servers, OpenAI is planning to spend about $85 billion a year on server rentals over the next five years, on average, according to the company’s private projections.” Yet deeper in the piece, The Information added that “OpenAI plans to spend $450 billion renting servers through 2030, including $100 billion in backup servers it says are ‘monetizeable’.” There is no mentioned request for comment. On September 29 2025, The Information reported that OpenAI “generated around $4.3 billion in revenue in the first half of 2025, about 16% more than it generated all of last year, according to financial disclosures to shareholders.” OpenAI “burned $2.5 billion” in the first half of 2025 (assume all following statements are from that time period). OpenAI spent $2 billion on sales and marketing. OpenAI spent $6.2 billion on research and development, which The Information believes is to due to research compute costs. OpenAI “looked on track to meet its full-year revenue projection of $13 billion and $8.5 billion of cash burn.” There is no mentioned request for comment. On October 31 2025, The Wall Street Journal reported that Microsoft had mentioned in its recent earnings that it had taken a $4.1 billion loss on their investment in OpenAI, implying a more than $12 billion quarterly loss at the company due to Microsoft’s 32.% stake in that quarter (which has now dropped to 27%).
November 6, 2025 at 9:24 PM
lundstem.bsky.social
🌟 Our 2025 Article of the Year Award goes to Ervin Ascic & @cellreprolab.bsky.social for “turning cancer against itself.” Their Science (2024) paper describes a new gene therapy approach that reprograms cancer cells into immune cells to attack tumors.

🔗 www.stemcellcenter.lu.se/article/turn...
Turning Cancer Against Itself: Ervin Ascic awarded the 2025 Article of the Year Award
Lund University. Now in its eighth year, the Article of the Year Award highlights exceptional research that advances the fields of stem cell biology and regenerative medicine. Since 2017, Principal…
www.stemcellcenter.lu.se
November 6, 2025 at 4:17 PM
thecovidinfoguy.bsky.social
(3/3) NSW COVID-19 Sewage surveillance program: Week ending 1 November 2025

🔹Bondi: ⬇️DOWN
🔹Liverpool: ⬇️DOWN
🔹Quakers Hill: ⬇️DOWN
🔹Hunter: ⬆️UP

@NSWHealth

Source: health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/c...
A report section titled “COVID-19 Wastewater Surveillance Program.” It states that wastewater data is being tracked in Bondi, Liverpool, Quakers Hill, and Burwood Beach (Hunter) from May 2024 to November 2025. The interpretation text notes: “Gene concentrations per 1,000 people are low in all catchments.” Below are four line graphs showing normalised SARS-CoV-2 gene concentration per 1,000 people over time: Bondi: Levels fluctuate between ~2,000 and ~7,000 early on, with a gradual decline across the period. Liverpool: Similar pattern, with peaks around mid-2024 and mid-2025, trending downward into late 2025. Quakers Hill: Higher early peaks (~8,000–12,000), followed by moderate fluctuations and gradual decline. Burwood Beach (Hunter): Shows moderate peaks early in 2024 and mid-2025, trending downward by late 2025. All four sites show declining levels toward November 2025.
November 6, 2025 at 2:37 AM
mari-rochelle.bsky.social
Why are people transgender?
Why People Are Trans, What Biology Actually Says Everyone begins the same way. In the very first weeks after conception, there is no male or female body. Every human embryo follows the same early plan. At about five weeks of development the fetus still has the same set of tissues, the genital ridge and two duct systems that could become male or female organs. Even the nipples form before hormones that create sexual difference appear. That is why everyone has them. Between weeks six and twelve, genes and hormones begin steering development. A gene on the Y chromosome called SRY can switch on production of testosterone in the testes. If it activates and the fetus’ cells respond strongly, male anatomy begins to form. If it does not, female anatomy develops by default. But this process is never all-or-nothing. Timing, hormone levels, receptor sensitivity, and countless small genetic variations can change how the body or brain develops. Those variations are natural. They produce what biologists call sexual differentiation, not a simple binary. Intersex people, around 1.3 million in the UK alone, are living proof that human sex traits can overlap or differ from textbook categories. Some have XY chromosomes but develop ovaries; others have XX chromosomes but higher testosterone; some have combinations that don’t fit either. This is ordinary human biology. Brain development follows a similar path. During pregnancy, the brain is shaped by the same hormones that guide the body, but in some people the two do not match perfectly. Decades of neuroscience show subtle structural and functional differences between typical male and female brains. Research published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2019, 20:725–735) found that in transgender women, several brain regions more closely resemble female patterns than male ones. That means their sense of identity is rooted in biology, not imagination. So being trans is not a trend, a phase, or a social contagion. It is a natural expre… Why People Are Trans, What Biology Actually Says Everyone begins the same way. In the very first weeks after conception, there is no male or female body. Every human embryo follows the same early plan. At about five weeks of development the fetus still has the same set of tissues, the genital ridge and two duct systems that could become male or female organs. Even the nipples form before hormones that create sexual difference appear. That is why everyone has them. Between weeks six and twelve, genes and hormones begin steering development. A gene on the Y chromosome called SRY can switch on production of testosterone in the testes. If it activates and the fetus’ cells respond strongly, male anatomy begins to form. If it does not, female anatomy develops by default. But this process is never all-or-nothing. Timing, hormone levels, receptor sensitivity, and countless small genetic variations can change how the body or brain develops. Those variations are natural. They produce what biologists call sexual differentiation, not a simple binary. Intersex people, around 1.3 million in the UK alone, are living proof that human sex traits can overlap or differ from textbook categories. Some have XY chromosomes but develop ovaries; others have XX chromosomes but higher testosterone; some have combinations that don’t fit either. This is ordinary human biology. Brain development follows a similar path. During pregnancy, the brain is shaped by the same hormones that guide the body, but in some people the two do not match perfectly. Decades of neuroscience show subtle structural and functional differences between typical male and female brains. Research published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2019, 20:725–735) found that in transgender women, several brain regions more closely resemble female patterns than male ones. That means their sense of identity is rooted in biology, not imagination. So being trans is not a trend, a phase, or a social contagion. It is a natural expression of the way human development works. Across cultures and history, societies have recognised more than two genders, from hijra in South Asia to Two-Spirit people in Indigenous America to fa’afafine in Samoa. What modern science adds is an understanding of how this diversity arises: through ordinary variation in genes, hormones, and brain organisation. Large-scale studies confirm that gender-affirming treatment can ease suffering. Access to puberty blockers, hormone therapy, or supportive healthcare is linked with dramatic reductions in depression and suicidal thoughts. The Trevor Project’s 2023 report found trans youth with access to gender-affirming care were 73 percent less likely to attempt suicide. The Endocrine Society and the World Health Organization both recognise this care as medically necessary. Yet misinformation keeps spreading, claims that biology is simple, that sex can be determined only by chromosomes, that people can be “made trans” by culture. Real biology says otherwise. Even chromosomes are not absolute: some women have XY; some men have XXY; others have mosaic patterns of both. What matters for lived reality is how bodies and brains develop, not a single letter on a lab report. If you have ever wondered why trans people exist, the answer is right there in nature. Every embryo starts the same. Hormones and genes push development in different directions. Sometimes the brain and the body don’t line up perfectly, and that is part of what makes humanity so varied and complex. Trans people are not against nature, they are nature. They exist because of biology. Verified Sources • National Institutes of Health Fetal Development Week by Week (2024) • Scientific American “The New Science of Sex and Gender” (2017) • Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2019 20:725–735 Sex differences in the human brain • Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline on Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons (2017) • World Health Organization Sex and Gender in Health Research (2022) • The Trevor Project U.S. National Survey on LGBTQ Youth Mental Health (2023)
November 5, 2025 at 5:18 PM
beeswire.bsky.social
Gene Synthesis growing at a CAGR of 16.8% from 2025 to 2033

The global gene synthesis (research-use) market size was estimated at USD 2.09 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 8.39 billion by 2033, growing at a CAGR of 16.8% from 2025 to 2033. The surging investment by players in the…
Gene Synthesis growing at a CAGR of 16.8% from 2025 to 2033
The global gene synthesis (research-use) market size was estimated at USD 2.09 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 8.39 billion by 2033, growing at a CAGR of 16.8% from 2025 to 2033. The surging investment by players in the synthetic biology field and supportive government laws & rules are expected to propel market growth. Key Market Trends & Insights North America gene synthesis (research-use) market held the largest share of 36.80% of the global market in 2024. The gene synthesis (research-use) industry in the U.S. is expected to grow significantly over the forecast period.
beeswire.com
November 5, 2025 at 9:56 AM
ecseq.bsky.social
🚀 In SaxoCell Phase 2, ecSeq delivers NGS pipelines and software solutions to advance gene and cell therapeutics. 🧬 Read more: www.ecseq.com/blog/2024/ecS... #NGS #Bioinformatics #PrecisionMedicine #SaxoCell
November 4, 2025 at 6:45 AM
davidbrace2.bsky.social
"(they)(them)", pencil crayon/graphite on paper, 6 x 11 1/2", 2024. #art #birds
A colour drawing of 2 sparrows in profile facing each other, the male on the left, the female on the right. When I was reading about sparrows I discovered that a gene mutation in white breasted sparrows causes them to effectively express 4 genders.
November 2, 2025 at 11:37 PM
khayem.bsky.social
#last4albums

#GeneLovesJezebell
#NeilYoung
#AirInTheLungs
#TheSabresOfParadise

Sounds From The Flightpath Estate v1 was my 2024 album of the year. Yet, I still can’t wrap my head around how jaw-droppingly brilliant v2 is.

@lnfg.bsky.social
@adamturner23.bsky.social
Discover / Glad To Be Alive by Gene Loves Jezebell (1986) Harvest by Neil Young (1972) Air In The Lungs by Air In The Lungs (2023) Sounds From The Flightpath Estate Volume Two by various artists (2025)
November 2, 2025 at 9:15 PM
dnarnaresearch.bsky.social
Diverse haplotypes at a complex Solanum americanum locus confer resistance to Phytophthora infestans and P. capsici
doi.org/10.1101/2025...

Phylogenomics and metabolic engineering reveal a conserved gene cluster in Solanaceae plants for withanolide biosynthesis
doi.org/10.1101/2024...
Diverse haplotypes at a complex Solanum americanum locus confer resistance to Phytophthora infestans and P. capsici
Plants encounter diverse pathogens and have evolved a two-layered innate immune system to detect pathogen molecules and activate defense mechanisms that restrict infection. Most cloned plant Resistanc...
doi.org
November 2, 2025 at 6:53 AM
wordglass.bsky.social
The volatile situation sparked last spring when Northern Cheyenne Tribal President Gene Small, a rancher who campaigned in 2024 on transparency, initiated an audit into the council’s use of federal COVID-19 relief funds.
2/6
November 1, 2025 at 3:56 PM
diarynz.bsky.social
Pandora’s Box: The Real Dangers Of The Gene Technology Bill

Friday, 31 October 2025, 5:43 pmPress Release: Flora and Fauna of Aotearoa New Zealand at a dangerous turning point Right now, Parliament is considering the Gene Technology Bill (2024) – a bill that would replace the 1996 Hazardous…
Pandora’s Box: The Real Dangers Of The Gene Technology Bill
Friday, 31 October 2025, 5:43 pmPress Release: Flora and Fauna of Aotearoa New Zealand at a dangerous turning point Right now, Parliament is considering the Gene Technology Bill (2024) – a bill that would replace the 1996 Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act when it comes to genetic engineering and end nearly 30 years of New Zealand’s GE-free status. The Government says the bill will “enable…
diary.nz
November 1, 2025 at 4:12 AM
drramblings.bsky.social
Now they need to host less family reunions with alcohol and poor choices, and maybe the gene pool improves with time. Only half kidding bc some legislators are actively arguing about incest. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024...
Tennessee legislature passes bill banning marriage between first cousins
Proposal sails through, with one vocal opponent saying gay first cousins do not risk having a child with birth defects
www.theguardian.com
October 31, 2025 at 11:43 PM
postbulletin.bsky.social
The seat was once held by DFLer Gene Pelowski, who retired in 2024.
Dan Wilson running for Winona seat in Minnesota House
The seat was once held by DFLer Gene Pelowski, who retired in 2024.
www.postbulletin.com
October 31, 2025 at 7:18 PM
phypapers.bsky.social
Prevalence and VP1 Gene Evaluation Analysis of Porcine Sapelovirus in Yunnan Province, China, from 2024 to 2025 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41157607/
October 31, 2025 at 2:48 PM