#ContentBased
LightNews LightNews
mfy.social
Content-based recommendation systems shine in cold start scenarios by analyzing item features, not user behavior. A game-changer for new platforms! 🚀📊 #RecommendationSystems #MachineLearning #ContentBased fanyangmeng.blog/content-base...
Content-Based Recommendation Systems: When Items Speak for Themselves
Master content-based recommendation systems that solve cold start problems collaborative filtering can't handle. Learn TF-IDF mathematics, Naive Bayes classification, feature engineering & Python impl...
fanyangmeng.blog
June 4, 2025 at 4:21 AM
kathryntewson.bsky.social
It's another one of these meaty, substantial opinions -- 63 pages of well-researched and well-reasoned decision making. It is . . . not kind . . . to the government.
Because even the government does not know what constitutes DEI-related speech that violates federal anti-discrimination laws, Plaintiffs have easily shown a likelihood that they will prevail in proving that the Certification Provision operates as a contentbased prior restraint on their speech, and likely will also prevail in showing that the Certification operates as a facially viewpoint-discriminatory order as well. The speechchilling effect of the Certification Provision is particularly obvious given the vagueness of the J20 and J21 orders, as discussed in sections III.C and III.E.2. Plaintiffs, their members, and other federal contractors and grantees have shown they are unable to know which of their DEI programs (if any) violate federal anti-discrimination laws, and are highly likely to chill their own speech—to self-censor, and reasonably so—because of the Certification Provision. Indeed, the Certification Provision was likely designed to induce, and certainly has been shown to have the effect of inducing, federal contractors and grantees to apply an overinclusive definition of illegal DEI to avoid risking liability. This is exactly what AID prohibits—the government leveraging its funding to restrict federal contractors and grantees from otherwise exercising their First Amendment rights outside the scope of the federal funding.
February 22, 2025 at 12:31 AM