Charlie :3
@yourfavstranger.bsky.social
just a silly little guy
he/they
i love being queer also trans rights forever
tumblr: https://ur-fav-stranger.tumblr.com/
he/they
i love being queer also trans rights forever
tumblr: https://ur-fav-stranger.tumblr.com/
Reposted by Charlie :3
im guessing one that status quo hater would be responding to then
November 14, 2025 at 2:09 AM
im guessing one that status quo hater would be responding to then
if this is the person you are talking about i dont think it (it uses it/its) meant it in the way you are interpreting it? in fact its pretty clear about it
![An anonymous ask on tumblr reads "So what exactly do you make of people calling trans women "wollfipathians"?" Underneath status-quo-hater says "I think it's misgendering and completely undermines the entire reason terms like TWDP/TMDP are useful. Body parts are not something you are— they are something you have. A person is not a "wollpathian" the same way a person is not a "male" (with regards to sex). Sexes are social constructs. A person has (or had) a TSDP (Typical sex development pathway), this is no different than saying a person has (or had) a certain individual body part, like testes or a penis or whatever else. It just refers to a cluster of body parts that appear together in perisex individuals. It is a neutral statement regarding anatomy only with no regards to gender. Anyone can have any sex traits regardless of gender. The phrasing of that term defines trans women by their bodies and is literally defined by the person who coined it as a synonym for "the male sex", it's transmisogynistic and blatant misgendering. People with a Typical Wolffian Developmental Pathway are not "male", they are not "of the male sex", they do not have "male sex traits", simply due to the fact that many people with these sex traits are transgender females. A penis/testes/deep voice/flat chest etc are things that women can be born with/develop at puberty. "Perisex trans women start out with [body parts]" is not misgendering. But "Perisex trans women are [term that defines a person by their body parts]" is, it's reducing trans people to their sex traits in largely the same way the concept of "biological sexes" does, and that is offensive."](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:e6b5vq7tz4sx4fkxk3ubmtee/bafkreialnjdlssh5baosh5vjbp3evrpe4baripinky5luyzkllqwhtxy7y@jpeg)
November 14, 2025 at 1:02 AM
if this is the person you are talking about i dont think it (it uses it/its) meant it in the way you are interpreting it? in fact its pretty clear about it
riolu i just saw your recent posts holy shit im so sorry that that happened to you 🫂 sending love
November 13, 2025 at 10:29 PM
riolu i just saw your recent posts holy shit im so sorry that that happened to you 🫂 sending love
im hugging you from afar 🫂
November 13, 2025 at 10:27 PM
im hugging you from afar 🫂
youre so real for that lol
November 13, 2025 at 7:23 PM
youre so real for that lol
also im sure everyones really normal about intersex people (last time i saw them brought up it was a post calling intersex activism transmisogynistic?? yalls stuggle literally go hand in hand what is everyone doing?)
November 13, 2025 at 5:21 PM
also im sure everyones really normal about intersex people (last time i saw them brought up it was a post calling intersex activism transmisogynistic?? yalls stuggle literally go hand in hand what is everyone doing?)
yea same its weird. nobody really seems to respect us but i hoped bluesky would be ok :/
November 13, 2025 at 5:16 PM
yea same its weird. nobody really seems to respect us but i hoped bluesky would be ok :/