Scales even worse, in fact.
November 13, 2025 at 8:58 PM
Scales even worse, in fact.
But instead claimed to not know why she was suspended.
November 12, 2025 at 8:42 PM
But instead claimed to not know why she was suspended.
Agreed, but I’m not sure it’s the role of admins to determine how serious the threat is.
November 12, 2025 at 7:46 PM
Agreed, but I’m not sure it’s the role of admins to determine how serious the threat is.
It sounds harsh to say, but you’re absolutely correct.
November 12, 2025 at 1:18 AM
It sounds harsh to say, but you’re absolutely correct.
Is the Bush administration woke in this narrative? Otherwise not sure how you hit 20 years.
November 12, 2025 at 12:51 AM
Is the Bush administration woke in this narrative? Otherwise not sure how you hit 20 years.
It never would have happened. If the pressure got too high the Republicans would have nuked the filibuster.
November 10, 2025 at 6:50 PM
It never would have happened. If the pressure got too high the Republicans would have nuked the filibuster.
Part of me wants to meet the Labour voters who think the BBC has a left-bias, but then I remember it’ll be folks who struggle to breathe without instructions.
November 10, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Part of me wants to meet the Labour voters who think the BBC has a left-bias, but then I remember it’ll be folks who struggle to breathe without instructions.
That’s not advantageous from his perspective though.
November 10, 2025 at 6:44 PM
That’s not advantageous from his perspective though.
Torres is a no and DNC Vice Chair Kenyatta says its a mistake
November 9, 2025 at 9:05 PM
A lot of Democratic House members publicly denouncing the deal.
November 9, 2025 at 9:01 PM
A lot of Democratic House members publicly denouncing the deal.
The CR is only through January and you can run the same play again.
November 9, 2025 at 8:56 PM
The CR is only through January and you can run the same play again.
Maybe they’ll let Mamdani host the Mao Tse Tung Hour.
November 9, 2025 at 8:55 PM
Maybe they’ll let Mamdani host the Mao Tse Tung Hour.
I can’t speak for Will, but I assume he’d agree with all that.
November 9, 2025 at 8:17 PM
I can’t speak for Will, but I assume he’d agree with all that.
Fair, although I understand the skepticism because that’s happened multiple times before.
November 9, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Fair, although I understand the skepticism because that’s happened multiple times before.
For some reason I read this as English people instead of the English language for a split second.
November 8, 2025 at 3:13 PM
For some reason I read this as English people instead of the English language for a split second.
They’re not good, but they’re better than the recent trilogy (which is bad for different reasons than most of its critics think).
November 8, 2025 at 3:06 PM
They’re not good, but they’re better than the recent trilogy (which is bad for different reasons than most of its critics think).
It’s more the latter. Guys got like got their brains baked by Trump because he was a shock to them.
November 8, 2025 at 2:59 PM
It’s more the latter. Guys got like got their brains baked by Trump because he was a shock to them.
When you say ”there are ideas there,” you’re implicitly saying they are ideas worth considering.
November 7, 2025 at 9:47 PM
When you say ”there are ideas there,” you’re implicitly saying they are ideas worth considering.
Mamdani is exactly the type of candidate folks like Shor said we shouldn‘t run, so of course he’s going to spin like this.
November 7, 2025 at 9:45 PM
Mamdani is exactly the type of candidate folks like Shor said we shouldn‘t run, so of course he’s going to spin like this.
I don’t think that’s true though. Most of the stuff you get from Murray et al today is just warmed over shit from the 1970s.
November 7, 2025 at 9:41 PM
I don’t think that’s true though. Most of the stuff you get from Murray et al today is just warmed over shit from the 1970s.
Best president we never had.
November 7, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Best president we never had.
It can be, but not necessarily. It’s not a huge dataset, but we’ve had enough elections to project how we’d expected generic candidates to do based on structural factors and Trump way underperformed what you’d expect a generic candidate in his position.
November 7, 2025 at 1:37 PM
It can be, but not necessarily. It’s not a huge dataset, but we’ve had enough elections to project how we’d expected generic candidates to do based on structural factors and Trump way underperformed what you’d expect a generic candidate in his position.
In fairness, the package is only worth a trillion dollars if he meets a bunch of benchmarks that would sorta justify it.
November 6, 2025 at 10:14 PM
In fairness, the package is only worth a trillion dollars if he meets a bunch of benchmarks that would sorta justify it.
The safety concerns are real, but they’ve also shredded their credibility.
November 6, 2025 at 1:12 PM
The safety concerns are real, but they’ve also shredded their credibility.