Wyvernsrose #RaiseTheRate
LightNews LightNews
banner
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
Wyvernsrose #RaiseTheRate
@wyvernsrose.bsky.social
2.6K followers 6.1K following 12K posts
I am me. It's that simple. If you don't like me, I am not the one with the problem. I am perfectly comfortable with being hated

I'm a problem

Still blind in one eye, prone to mini strokes

She/Her/Mum/Boobs

*Warning Label*

linktr.ee/wyvernsrose
Posts Replies Media Videos
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
November 6, 2025 at 6:45 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
open.spotify.com/track/7fdVUp...

Shannon has spoken
Hey mum I think this song fits you petty well It's prophetic No, it's not pathetic
November 5, 2025 at 12:14 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
You have six days to protect your right to protest peoples

participate.melbourne.vic.gov.au/safe-city-ca...

vt.tiktok.com/ZSUGHsxXt/
Protect your right to privacy and protest Melbourne
October 22, 2025 at 12:20 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
in conference this weekend

#CommunitiesInAction #PeoplePoweredPolitics #CommunityIndependents
September 5, 2025 at 9:24 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
I was right we just had another election and it's almost half
August 22, 2025 at 10:00 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
Burn it ALL
April 24, 2025 at 4:41 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
April 22, 2025 at 12:08 PM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
April 22, 2025 at 12:08 PM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
I had a day
April 21, 2025 at 7:18 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....

The Father, the Son, and the Abuser: The Portrayal of Male Victims of Intimate Partner Homicide in the News Media

this reflects what pizzey found... but strangely they don't include her work in the reference...

but this also outlines the additional challenge
April 19, 2025 at 8:27 PM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
Good morning sexy
April 16, 2025 at 4:17 PM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
April 8, 2025 at 1:14 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
April 8, 2025 at 12:27 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
ZOLADEX 3.6mg
April 6, 2025 at 4:47 PM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
April 4, 2025 at 9:28 PM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
April 1, 2025 at 11:51 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
March 14, 2025 at 9:40 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
archive.md/sT38U
Teals must support renewables ‘at an industrial level’
Teals must support renewables ‘at an industrial level’ Ryan Cropp Ryan CroppEnergy and climate reporter Mar 6, 2025 – 4.36pm Save Share Gift this article Representatives of Australia’s biggest clean energy companies say if Climate 200-backed political players are serious about renewables, they should get behind mega-projects such as wind and solar farms and transmission that are essential for meeting emissions reduction commitments. Richie Merzian, who leads the Clean Energy Investor Group, backed calls for a stronger political defence of the country’s fledgling offshore wind industry after a swathe of otherwise pro-renewables independent candidates expressed doubt about several major projects. He said Climate 200 MPs and candidates should advocate more robustly for industrial-scale renewable developments rather than focusing on small-scale household measures like rooftop solar and batteries.
March 7, 2025 at 3:24 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
whatever else you may think it is fuck knows but its not here or wasn't

endorsing political parties as such was started by ABF...

didn't even endorse those listed just list policies of all parties and people make their choice
The fathers' rights movement in Australia focus on issues of erosion of the family unit, child custody, shared parenting, child access, child support, domestic violence against men, false allegations of domestic violence, child abuse, the reintroduction of fault into divorce proceedings, gender bias, the adversarial family court system and secrecy issues. History The fathers' rights movement began in Australia in the 1970s with the founding of organizations such as the Lone Fathers Association. Other groups include Fathers4Equality, Dads Against Discrimination, Fathers Without Rights, The Men's Confraternity, and the Shared Parenting Council.[1] the Men's Rights Agency[2] and One in Three.[3]
March 2, 2025 at 3:57 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
Australia Main article: Fathers' rights movement in Australia Fathers' rights groups began in Australia in the 1970s with the founding of organizations such as the Lone Fathers Association. Other well-known groups include Equality for Fathers, Dads Against Discrimination, Fathers Without Rights, The Men's Confraternity and the Shared Parenting Council. As with other fathers' rights activists, Australian organizations focus on issues of erosion of the family unit, custody, access, child support, domestic violence (including false allegations, and violence against men), child abuse, maintenance, the reintroduction of fault into divorce proceedings, biased and adversarial court systems and secrecy issues. Groups have successfully garnered media, as well as influence on politicians and legal reform.[1] On May 22, 2006, Australia passed the "Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act 2006" making both parents responsible for decisions about their child through the concept of 'equal shared parental responsibility'.[2] The Act requires courts to consider an order that the child spend equal amounts of time with each parent under certain circumstances, but the Act does not state that courts must order that the child spend equal amounts of time with each parent.[2][3] While Dad's in Distress expressed both appreciation of the Act as a small step in the right direction and concern whether the changes would be taken seriously by Family Law Practitioners[4] and Barry Williams, national president and founder of the Lone Fathers Association, stated, "I think these new laws are going to be the best in 30 years",[5] The Men's Confraternity welcomed the changes but also expressed disappointment and stated that the Act does not "force the Court to view parents as equals."[6][7] The Non-Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting)[8] was formed in Australia in 1998. The party's web-site states that the core policies centre on the issue of family law and child support refor…
March 2, 2025 at 3:57 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
When you have initial contact with an individual seeking services, pay attention to red flags you might hear which could indicate that you are speaking with an abuser. Red flags may include things like-  Demanding to be seen as a victim.  Repeatedly mentioning and dismissing/justifying violence they have committed toward partner.  Exaggerating their own injuries and minimizing their partner’s.  History of threats, violence toward other people, non-domestic crime, or weapons use.  Using abusive language toward the advocate. Recognize the limits of your knowledge. Batterers are skilled manipulators, accustomed to convincing others of the character they want to portray. It is not the fault of an advocate if someone is admitted into shelter who then behaves in an abusive or violent manner. Every abuser is responsible for their own decisions and violence is a choice.
March 2, 2025 at 3:39 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
Screening for Abusers of any Gender Do not assume that all abusers are men and all victims are women. We know that these beliefs are false and can discourage non-female victims from seeking services. One of the most common concerns when thinking of housing men in shelter is the possibility of admitting an abuser into a safe shelter space. The fear of allowing abusers into shelter is understandable and valid, but advocates must be aware that this possibility is present with abusers of any gender. “What would happen if we offered the wrong services to the wrong person? We could place the survivor in danger or in jail and potentially send the message that it was their fault the abuse happened. We could also place the abuser in support services that validate the abuser and tell them they are not to blame for the abuse. We might place the abuser in a confidential shelter or help the abuser get a restraining order against a survivor. This could help the abuser find the survivor or turn a survivor away from services that they need. If we give the wrong services to the wrong person because we are not screening, people get hurt.” (Open Minds, Open Doors: Transforming Domestic Violence Programs to Include LGBTQ Survivors, The Network/La Red, 2010)
March 2, 2025 at 3:37 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
Men may be abusers trying to gain access to their victims/trying to victimize others. While it is certainly possible for abusers, or simply violent individuals, to gain access to shelter services this is not a phenomenon that is restricted to men. Advocates have a responsibility to understand that, while the majority of abusers are men, the majority of men are not abusers, and that women and those of other genders may also be abusers or engage in violent behavior in shelter. For this reason, the four central shelter rules include a ban on violent behavior in shelter, and violence is grounds for immediate exit from shelter services. The expectation is that the shelter environment is one that rejects both emotionally and physically violent behavior. To this end, advocates should be practiced in screening those seeking entrance into shelter to make sure they are not admitting abusers of any gender. Many programs have similar concerns about sheltering teen boys as secondary victims. For more information on this issue, see page 85.
March 2, 2025 at 3:36 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
 Male survivors will be alone/uncomfortable in ‘women’s space.’ This misconception is rooted in the idea that shelter is inherently a ‘women’s’ space, and that only women can be victims of domestic violence. This is a damaging myth that erases the lived experiences of victims of other genders and perpetuates the idea that men are not able to receive shelter services. This also maintains the outdated patriarchal idea that men and women are so fundamentally different that they cannot possibly coexist in a meaningful way. This is the opposite of the empowering, equality-focused ideals that should be central to meaningful antiviolence work
March 2, 2025 at 3:36 AM
wyvernsrose.bsky.social
 It is ‘inappropriate’ for men and women to share space. There is nothing inherently inappropriate or ‘immoral’ about housing male and female victims in one shelter. The assumption that male and female survivors, when housed together, will engage in sexual behaviors is misguided and short-sighted, erasing LGBTQ sexual identities and assuming that sexual behavior in shelter might only take place between clients of opposite genders. Additionally, it is not up to shelter staff to police the sexuality of consenting adult clients
March 2, 2025 at 3:35 AM