That’s not the current plan. We’re still working on it for now - testing, tweaking, replaying. In the spring we should be ready to show publishers something more ‘finished’.

This is the back of the book (I haven’t started it yet):

Delighted to hear that, Grant! Thank you for the news!

I never got any characters into any adventure - so you did far better than me.

To my mind it has something of The King Is Dead about it. You don’t play as a faction, but seek to influence them.

Yes - I think it worked well. There’s good stuff in here!

I played it just once just after it came out. Then sold it. But it’s been in my mind again of late, so wanted to take another look at it.

Yes - I don’t think you really find what’s special about this unless you embrace the chaos.

Yes - it’s really good, just what I was looking for - I like where he’s pitched this - battles get very short shrift - its focus is strategy and the relationship with policy.

You know, it did feel to me like there was a lineage there from RoR to this with soecifc regards to that collaborative layer to a competitive game. It certainly makes perfect sense.

Try to be clear about your focus - this guides you on what to exclude and how to organize things. It might mean you’re contracting a timeline by a regulated scale (for a defined set term), or might mean you can zip around a timeline in variegated scales to get to the relevant incidents/decisions.

This is my first time with the expansion and I like it. Combat feels better.