Weldon J. Wilkerson
@wjwilkersonjr.bsky.social
Husband. Father. Nerd.
Who brought potato salad?
November 25, 2025 at 5:11 AM
Who brought potato salad?
I came here to ask the same question.
November 18, 2025 at 3:24 AM
I came here to ask the same question.
Wait... That's real!?
a close up of a man with a mustache
ALT: a close up of a man with a mustache
media.tenor.com
November 5, 2025 at 5:06 AM
Wait... That's real!?
I'm confused. I literally said that above.
Is this comment directed at me OR are you just co-signing what I just said?
Is this comment directed at me OR are you just co-signing what I just said?
November 5, 2025 at 1:01 AM
I'm confused. I literally said that above.
Is this comment directed at me OR are you just co-signing what I just said?
Is this comment directed at me OR are you just co-signing what I just said?
Just so we're clear, going after a political opponent's child just because... was/is the problem.
You don't see Democrats attacking Jenna or Barbara Bush. And no one should have s*** to say about Chelsea Clinton or Malia and Sasha Obama.
If Baron is now participating in the family's grifting...
You don't see Democrats attacking Jenna or Barbara Bush. And no one should have s*** to say about Chelsea Clinton or Malia and Sasha Obama.
If Baron is now participating in the family's grifting...
a man in a police uniform says seems fair to me .
ALT: a man in a police uniform says seems fair to me .
media.tenor.com
November 4, 2025 at 7:51 PM
Just so we're clear, going after a political opponent's child just because... was/is the problem.
You don't see Democrats attacking Jenna or Barbara Bush. And no one should have s*** to say about Chelsea Clinton or Malia and Sasha Obama.
If Baron is now participating in the family's grifting...
You don't see Democrats attacking Jenna or Barbara Bush. And no one should have s*** to say about Chelsea Clinton or Malia and Sasha Obama.
If Baron is now participating in the family's grifting...
Pardon my analogy...
This is like having a friend in an abusive relationship. Occasionally they show up to social functions with bumps and bruises. They try to hide it with heavy makeup, but it's still obvious what's happening.
And, when you try to convince them to leave, they make excuses.
This is like having a friend in an abusive relationship. Occasionally they show up to social functions with bumps and bruises. They try to hide it with heavy makeup, but it's still obvious what's happening.
And, when you try to convince them to leave, they make excuses.
a woman in a leopard print shirt is making a gesture that says just like that
ALT: a woman in a leopard print shirt is making a gesture that says just like that
media.tenor.com
October 26, 2025 at 2:37 AM
Pardon my analogy...
This is like having a friend in an abusive relationship. Occasionally they show up to social functions with bumps and bruises. They try to hide it with heavy makeup, but it's still obvious what's happening.
And, when you try to convince them to leave, they make excuses.
This is like having a friend in an abusive relationship. Occasionally they show up to social functions with bumps and bruises. They try to hide it with heavy makeup, but it's still obvious what's happening.
And, when you try to convince them to leave, they make excuses.
This isn't a court of law. The evidence we had was more than sufficient.
Trump's the one who said Epstein liked young girls. That means, even IF he didn't participate, he knew.
He also bragged about walking in on his pageant contestants while they undressed.
Those facts alone should be enough!
Trump's the one who said Epstein liked young girls. That means, even IF he didn't participate, he knew.
He also bragged about walking in on his pageant contestants while they undressed.
Those facts alone should be enough!
July 22, 2025 at 4:28 AM
This isn't a court of law. The evidence we had was more than sufficient.
Trump's the one who said Epstein liked young girls. That means, even IF he didn't participate, he knew.
He also bragged about walking in on his pageant contestants while they undressed.
Those facts alone should be enough!
Trump's the one who said Epstein liked young girls. That means, even IF he didn't participate, he knew.
He also bragged about walking in on his pageant contestants while they undressed.
Those facts alone should be enough!
If they cared about kids/teens being sexually assaulted, they wouldn't have forced Matt Gaetz to resign from Congress a loooong time ago (when he was bragging about the girls he slept with to other Congressional members) AND Trump's association with Jeffery Epstein would have been a bridge too far.
July 22, 2025 at 4:18 AM
If they cared about kids/teens being sexually assaulted, they wouldn't have forced Matt Gaetz to resign from Congress a loooong time ago (when he was bragging about the girls he slept with to other Congressional members) AND Trump's association with Jeffery Epstein would have been a bridge too far.
I never said they did. I'm saying they don't give a **** about kids either.
They've got no problem stripping kids of healthcare and food assistance. They're defunding public education. Their idea of school safety is sending kids to school with bulletproof backpacks.
They've got no problem stripping kids of healthcare and food assistance. They're defunding public education. Their idea of school safety is sending kids to school with bulletproof backpacks.
July 22, 2025 at 4:12 AM
I never said they did. I'm saying they don't give a **** about kids either.
They've got no problem stripping kids of healthcare and food assistance. They're defunding public education. Their idea of school safety is sending kids to school with bulletproof backpacks.
They've got no problem stripping kids of healthcare and food assistance. They're defunding public education. Their idea of school safety is sending kids to school with bulletproof backpacks.
Given ALL of that, and the dozen or more things we've forgotten because... honestly... there is so much...You think the Epstein files was/is THE smoking gun?
Again... This info has been available for YEARS now. His supporters knew what they were voting for. They just didn't care.
Again... This info has been available for YEARS now. His supporters knew what they were voting for. They just didn't care.
July 22, 2025 at 1:49 AM
Given ALL of that, and the dozen or more things we've forgotten because... honestly... there is so much...You think the Epstein files was/is THE smoking gun?
Again... This info has been available for YEARS now. His supporters knew what they were voting for. They just didn't care.
Again... This info has been available for YEARS now. His supporters knew what they were voting for. They just didn't care.
Talking about Hannibal Lecter like he's a real person or implying George Washington won the Revolutionary War by defending our airports, and other nonsensical comments that demonstrate just how unfit he is to be President?
July 22, 2025 at 1:47 AM
Talking about Hannibal Lecter like he's a real person or implying George Washington won the Revolutionary War by defending our airports, and other nonsensical comments that demonstrate just how unfit he is to be President?
Or withholding cash aid to an ally (cash aid that Congress approved) because you want them to dig up dirt on a political opponent?
Or repeatedly lying to the public about the severity of Covid?
Being racist/sexist isn't enough?
Being a tax cheat isn't enough?
Being a habitual liar isn't enough?
Or repeatedly lying to the public about the severity of Covid?
Being racist/sexist isn't enough?
Being a tax cheat isn't enough?
Being a habitual liar isn't enough?
July 22, 2025 at 1:47 AM
Or withholding cash aid to an ally (cash aid that Congress approved) because you want them to dig up dirt on a political opponent?
Or repeatedly lying to the public about the severity of Covid?
Being racist/sexist isn't enough?
Being a tax cheat isn't enough?
Being a habitual liar isn't enough?
Or repeatedly lying to the public about the severity of Covid?
Being racist/sexist isn't enough?
Being a tax cheat isn't enough?
Being a habitual liar isn't enough?
So, if I understand you correctly...
Being an adjudicated rapist isn't disqualifying enough?
Neither is having 34 felony convictions?
Or lying about the 2020 election results, then inciting an insurrection w/ the goal of hanging the Vice President?
Being an adjudicated rapist isn't disqualifying enough?
Neither is having 34 felony convictions?
Or lying about the 2020 election results, then inciting an insurrection w/ the goal of hanging the Vice President?
July 22, 2025 at 1:46 AM
So, if I understand you correctly...
Being an adjudicated rapist isn't disqualifying enough?
Neither is having 34 felony convictions?
Or lying about the 2020 election results, then inciting an insurrection w/ the goal of hanging the Vice President?
Being an adjudicated rapist isn't disqualifying enough?
Neither is having 34 felony convictions?
Or lying about the 2020 election results, then inciting an insurrection w/ the goal of hanging the Vice President?
Lemme say this...
I don't understand what you're asking. Everything I mentioned above should have been more than enough to crater his campaigns in '16, '20, and '24.
He was found liable for rape... Why are they NOW drawing the line at statutory rape?
I don't understand what you're asking. Everything I mentioned above should have been more than enough to crater his campaigns in '16, '20, and '24.
He was found liable for rape... Why are they NOW drawing the line at statutory rape?
July 21, 2025 at 6:53 PM
Lemme say this...
I don't understand what you're asking. Everything I mentioned above should have been more than enough to crater his campaigns in '16, '20, and '24.
He was found liable for rape... Why are they NOW drawing the line at statutory rape?
I don't understand what you're asking. Everything I mentioned above should have been more than enough to crater his campaigns in '16, '20, and '24.
He was found liable for rape... Why are they NOW drawing the line at statutory rape?
This is revisionist history. The information has been there. We just decided Hillary's emails were more important.
July 21, 2025 at 4:26 PM
This is revisionist history. The information has been there. We just decided Hillary's emails were more important.
We remember Stormy Daniels and E. Jean Carroll. And pictures of him and Epstein have been available online since The scandal broke.
July 21, 2025 at 4:24 PM
We remember Stormy Daniels and E. Jean Carroll. And pictures of him and Epstein have been available online since The scandal broke.
You don't remember because YOU weren't paying attention. We all remember the Access Hollywood tapes. We all joked about the infamous Pee Pee Tape. We all remember the two dozen women who came forward saying, he did to them what he bragged about AND him (Trump) saying they were "too ugly to rape".
July 21, 2025 at 4:21 PM
You don't remember because YOU weren't paying attention. We all remember the Access Hollywood tapes. We all joked about the infamous Pee Pee Tape. We all remember the two dozen women who came forward saying, he did to them what he bragged about AND him (Trump) saying they were "too ugly to rape".
1. I'd prefer three centers, honestly.
2. Asking a rookie, second rounder to play 15 to 20 minutes a night is risky.
3. The Lakers had no really good FA options. And before signing Ayton, teams wanted all of the Lakers assets.
4. If it doesn't work out, $8M per is really easy to flip.
2. Asking a rookie, second rounder to play 15 to 20 minutes a night is risky.
3. The Lakers had no really good FA options. And before signing Ayton, teams wanted all of the Lakers assets.
4. If it doesn't work out, $8M per is really easy to flip.
July 4, 2025 at 5:02 AM
1. I'd prefer three centers, honestly.
2. Asking a rookie, second rounder to play 15 to 20 minutes a night is risky.
3. The Lakers had no really good FA options. And before signing Ayton, teams wanted all of the Lakers assets.
4. If it doesn't work out, $8M per is really easy to flip.
2. Asking a rookie, second rounder to play 15 to 20 minutes a night is risky.
3. The Lakers had no really good FA options. And before signing Ayton, teams wanted all of the Lakers assets.
4. If it doesn't work out, $8M per is really easy to flip.
I think you're needlessly splitting that hair.
The Lakers needed a center. They got one. No matter how disappointing he may be, he'll still be better than anyone they could have found in the second round.
Unless Jokic 2.0 was available (who knows), the Lakers made the right decision.
The Lakers needed a center. They got one. No matter how disappointing he may be, he'll still be better than anyone they could have found in the second round.
Unless Jokic 2.0 was available (who knows), the Lakers made the right decision.
July 4, 2025 at 4:45 AM
I think you're needlessly splitting that hair.
The Lakers needed a center. They got one. No matter how disappointing he may be, he'll still be better than anyone they could have found in the second round.
Unless Jokic 2.0 was available (who knows), the Lakers made the right decision.
The Lakers needed a center. They got one. No matter how disappointing he may be, he'll still be better than anyone they could have found in the second round.
Unless Jokic 2.0 was available (who knows), the Lakers made the right decision.
Honestly... Was there a center available in the second round that could contribute immediately to a team with championship aspirations?
Most first rounders (on good teams) play sparse minutes. Most second rounders almost never play, except for garbage time.
Most first rounders (on good teams) play sparse minutes. Most second rounders almost never play, except for garbage time.
July 4, 2025 at 1:12 AM
Honestly... Was there a center available in the second round that could contribute immediately to a team with championship aspirations?
Most first rounders (on good teams) play sparse minutes. Most second rounders almost never play, except for garbage time.
Most first rounders (on good teams) play sparse minutes. Most second rounders almost never play, except for garbage time.
And if he doesn't, he's an expiring $8M trade chip.
For the Lakers front office, this is a no-brainer.
For the Lakers front office, this is a no-brainer.
July 3, 2025 at 3:47 PM
And if he doesn't, he's an expiring $8M trade chip.
For the Lakers front office, this is a no-brainer.
For the Lakers front office, this is a no-brainer.