Litigation pro-tip, judges tend to get a wee bit shirty if your witnesses start heckling the other side's witnesses from the public gallery, as both my own experience and case law suggests

Honestly not sure what meaning of "own" they are going for here but I am going to choose its the colloquial, very online version

Did we only put a final, legislative stake through the heart of the East India Company in 2008?

Fascinating things found around the library, access card for scale

Curious attempt by the NZ greyhound racing industry to effectively seek to interdict a minister from taking action on a Cabinet decision featuring a nice Fitzgerald v Muldoon reference - NZ Greyhound Racing Association v The Attorney-General [2025] NZHC 2665 www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases...

Interesting incidence of a party who was representing themselves referring to having used ChatGPT in their preparation for the Competition Appeals Tribunal (sitting as a Scottish Tribunal), more details on case here: www.catribunal.org.uk/cases/167257...

And then came the Village Green Preservation Society... (unsuccessful in its efforts it should be said) - from Cotham School v Bristol City Council [2025] EWHC 1382 (Ch)

This case has some good bits

Judicial notice that lawyers are well paid, seems legit - JP Morgan International Finance Ltd v WEREALIZE.COM Ltd [2025] EWHC 1842 (Comm)

Now we know that the EU Withdrawal Acts are some of the most horrifying pieces of legislation ever but I think is the also the first time I've ever seen an act say "maybe look over there too?" - s 7A(5) of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018