4. Standing in the way of progress is the very definition of Conservatism. If Establishment Dems continue to elevate status quo over change, they are the same wolves in different clothing as exist across the aisle. They can accept that, or see far more Cuomos getting kicked in the teeth.

we have better, less ambiguous things to impeach this asshole over. Now, establishment Dems need to act on that, or at least support and not block any action in the future, lest they deserve the current vitriol.

3. Iran has been a destabilizing force in the Middle East for decades. Other presidents have taken violent action without declaration of war or approval of Congress. That does not make THIS action the correct action, nor reduce the increase in danger worldwide this action has caused. But,

2. Two things can and often are true at the same time. Israel is committing war crimes. Hamas is a terrorist state using civilians as sheild. Hamas was the initiator. Israel is now the aggressor. See? In two instances, BOTH are true. It is not antisemitism to have eyes and ethics.

My base? Honey, I don't have a base. I just understand that governance requires compromise, and I'd rather vote in a manner that promotes the least harm, instead of abdicating to abject evil.

Again, the "I want it the way I want it and to hell with compromise" is childish.

Oh, look. Someone who has never grasped the concept of cutting off one's own nose to spite their face.

Grow. Up.

Why is Terror in quotes? That's some bullshit. This was an act of terrorism, driven by hate. The end.

Most American Jews have never been conservative and never will be. Orthodox and a small but not insignificant percentage of Conservative Jews have always supported right wing candidates.

This is not new, nor is it news, nor are the numbers of Trump backing Jews high enough to constitute a rift.

You are entitled to that opinion. Why are you belaboring the point? I'm not going to agree with you. The world still turns.

Wow. So now recognizing insecurities and a desire for attention is "giving a mental health diagnosis".

Words matter. Nobody "diagnosed" her. We simply made clear and obvious observations. lol

Deb, please explain to me how using a photo we know she doesn't like is, in any way, insulting her looks? You are the only person here who has mentioned her neck wrinkles or her makeup or anything to do with her looks. Everyone else is talking about her insecurities. Looks don't matter.

Her looks aren't now, and never were, the problem. The point is to a) activate clear insecurities in these people and b) remind their followers that they are in fact humans with insecurities and c) to provoke them into embarrassing themselves further.

Show them the emporers have no clothes.

We should only use her old photos, before the Republibarbie glow up.

We should use only pics of any of them that are unflattering and expose just how much they've each had done.

And when we're confronted about it, we can innocently say we reject any elective gender-affirming care.

This kind of shit is well beyond canary in the mine. It's a death knell. The income inequality in this country is untenable.