Schon Weg
LightNews LightNews
banner
wegschon.bsky.social
Schon Weg
@wegschon.bsky.social
34 followers 160 following 61 posts
Widersprüche sind nicht aufzulösen
Posts Replies Media Videos
wegschon.bsky.social
Und die Umfragen verlieren sie damit ebenfalls: bsky.app/profile/ipso...
ipsosintheuk.bsky.social Ipsos in the UK @ipsosintheuk.bsky.social · 13d
NEW from Ipsos

Satisfaction with the PM remains unchanged since September, continuing to be the worst ever recorded by Ipsos for a Prime Minister, going back to 1977…
November 17, 2025 at 10:25 PM
wegschon.bsky.social
Das sollte eigentlich in allen aktuellen Browsern bis auf Opera Mini aktiv sein. Hängt jedenfalls vom Browser ab.

caniuse.com/webgl2
WebGL 2.0 | Can I use... Support tables for HTML5, CSS3, etc
caniuse.com
November 9, 2025 at 8:53 PM
wegschon.bsky.social
Sounds like very weird logic in the majority opinion: There was evidence but we get to ignore it because it wasn’t submitted by the school district. Of course they didn’t mention that distinction so it might also be intentional obfuscation to make it look like there was no evidence.
November 7, 2025 at 9:12 AM
wegschon.bsky.social
Second part here.
This approach makes practical sense. It recognizes the obligation of the court to consider all the evidence placed before it by the parties to the litigation and avoids the danger of gamesmanship regarding Tinker's burden. Thus, the appropriate consideration is whether evidence of likely substantial disruption was in the record-regardless of which party put it there.
November 7, 2025 at 9:08 AM
wegschon.bsky.social
If I understand this part of the dissent correctly (it is confusing because I think it mentions Defending Education twice when in one of those cases it meant a different organization), the school district didn’t introduce evidence for that because there was already evidence for that in the record.
Second, Defending Education argues that the School District failed to meet the Tinker standard because the District itself did not put evidence into the record supporting its forecast of substantial disruption. The majority opinion follows suit by completely ignoring the evidence Defending Education put into the record that intentional use of non-preferred pronouns results in trauma, humiliation, depression, and, in some cases self-harm. Maj. op. at 3 (stating only that the School District "introduced no evidence that the use of biological pronouns would disrupt school functions"). This misunderstands the Tinker standard.
November 7, 2025 at 9:01 AM
Reposted by Schon Weg
steurer.bsky.social
Interview vom Dez 2020: "Unter 2C ... zu bleiben wäre extrem wichtig – und noch möglich, aber nicht mehr lange. Wir entscheiden das in den nächsten Jahren. Jedes Jahr ohne Fortschritte macht das Erreichen des Ziels unmöglicher." Emissionen sind seither gestiegen 🙈 www.derstandard.at/story/200012...
Klimaforscher Steurer: "Die Verleugnung und Verharmlosung von Fakten ist tödlich"
Zwischen der Klima- und der Corona-Krise gibt es Parallelen, sagt der Politikwissenschafter Steurer. Er fordert einen CO2-Preis mit Lenkungswirkung
www.derstandard.at
October 29, 2025 at 5:43 PM
wegschon.bsky.social
„Kümmern sich um Bürgeranliegen“?!? „Bürgeranliegen“ wie „Ich wäre gerne Leiter eines Finanzamtes, obwohl es qualifiziertere Bewerberinnen gibt“?
October 7, 2025 at 7:31 PM