猫好きな人
banner
valoisdubins.bsky.social
猫好きな人
@valoisdubins.bsky.social
Briton in Japan
🗣️🇬🇧🇯🇵🇷🇺🆗, learning 🇺🇦
🏳️‍🌈 🏳️‍⚧️ ally
Yes.

She said the quiet bit about corrupting the review process very much out loud.
November 14, 2025 at 2:14 AM
To be fair, he does say this. Which reads like a jab at his fellow presenters, tbh.
November 12, 2025 at 11:16 AM
Thank you for addressing this head on. Prescott’s claim that the BBC is pro-trans is a clear tell that this is a far right push going on.
November 11, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Reminds me of this from the BMJ editor in chief.

The BMA lodged a formal protest with the BMJ over its trans health coverage.
November 11, 2025 at 11:25 AM
I don’t think it’s entirely nostalgia. Buying your own home is clearly much harder now and that’s a big element in financial wellbeing.
November 9, 2025 at 5:52 AM
Litigious would be she who should not be named or the alien genitalia obsessive, but spitting adder sounds much more like Glinner

So genuinely not sure
November 8, 2025 at 4:54 AM
They appear to be hiring AI specialists, not people to promote tech in domain subject faculties.
November 8, 2025 at 1:28 AM
UK transphobes in particular are sexually obsessed with trans people.

This is leading anti-trans campaigner Graham Linehan, obsessed with a form of pornography that I believe most trans people have never even heard of.
November 7, 2025 at 8:15 AM
I’m trying to put my finger on why that might not have occurred to her as something to put front and centre.

And tearing my hair out.
November 6, 2025 at 7:54 AM
Dear God, I had a look.

And he keeps replying, over and over and over and over.

This is full-on harassment. Of a woman, and as ever, of a former friend, clearly upset at the loss of friendship.

Everything bad that has happened to him is his fault. He has deserved it.
November 6, 2025 at 5:25 AM
Just for the record: no evidence of ANY health effects.

This is what bona fide experts predicted right from the very beginning.

These anti-science fearmongers are the same as anti-vaxxers with their dangerous arrogance that literally gets people killed.

www.unscear.org/unscear/uplo...
November 6, 2025 at 2:29 AM
You openly scorn all health expertise telling you people *didn’t* die from radiation, children *didn’t* get cancer.

You can try censor people telling the truth as much as you want.

But sorry, you don’t get to spread harmful disinfo to satiate your messed up psychological needs without a response.
November 6, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Look at sunny California and Mew Mexico.

Then look at France.

Climate change is serious. Bullshitting for the solar industry is bullshitting for gas - for fossil fuel companies. Solar is not the magic bullet you claim.
November 5, 2025 at 4:06 PM
I mean, solar wind and nuclear are all hugely safer than fossil fuels, and also biomass and hydro.

(Part of my desire to understand energy came from all the disinformation spread during Fukushima about how dangerous it was supposed to be (but as muffled experts kept saying, wasn’t).
November 4, 2025 at 8:09 AM
News just in:

woke means NOT cancelling the far right
November 4, 2025 at 5:02 AM
They can be built. But how much can be built? What proportion of Tohoku’s energy comes from solar with all these panels built so far? How much spare land is left?

How much storage is needed to shift supply from day to night?

The numbers don’t add up. We need another source.
November 4, 2025 at 1:37 AM
Wow.

(I have to use clearsky to see his skeets because he blocked me for demonstrating he made things up.)
November 3, 2025 at 1:23 PM
No prefecture creates “a lot” of wind power. Akita is part of the Tohoku grid.

This is generation from Tohoku.

Seriously, average wind speeds in Japan are low.

Personally, I think wind is a much better resource than solar - but only if you have enough of it.
November 3, 2025 at 11:41 AM
Engagement indicates demand: If people choose to spend their scarce market-valuable attention watching a fake video, that’s their revealed preference.

So clearly there is demand for it.
November 2, 2025 at 6:07 AM
“The economic case” hinges on the word “could”

Meanwhile, Higher Ed in the UK - which all these extra students *could* go to - is being decimated year by year in the same name of technological advancement.

I can’t help feeling the money could be spent better.
October 31, 2025 at 11:21 PM
I dunno. I suspect the theory that a group of people I don't like are actually just the same as the Nazis probably holds a lot of water.
October 30, 2025 at 3:23 PM
<screaming inside>
October 29, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Hi @the-independent.com

Your article about John Cleese’ tribute to Prunella Scales has a clip from Fawlty Towers that doesn’t feature Prunella Scales.

Can you fix that?
October 29, 2025 at 12:02 AM
I tried that and found out that Grokipedia might have some hallucination issues.

The footnotes are where it is inserting its own edits. Note 2 is to a LinkedIn post.
October 28, 2025 at 5:45 AM
I know, I know, posting stuff from Xitter annoys some people, but this made me laugh out loud about how the Internet is dissolving into AI slop applied liberally to the egos of assholes who miraculously manage to be both fabulously wealthy yet also embarrassing losers.
October 28, 2025 at 5:29 AM