AI security ≠ traditional cybersecurity.
The attack surface is language itself — intent, context, and semantics.
llm-security helps developers bridge that gap before LLMs reach production scale.
Defense starts with awareness.
#AISecurity #LLM #PromptSecurity #Rust
— Valh4x
AI security ≠ traditional cybersecurity.
The attack surface is language itself — intent, context, and semantics.
llm-security helps developers bridge that gap before LLMs reach production scale.
Defense starts with awareness.
#AISecurity #LLM #PromptSecurity #Rust
— Valh4x
let security = LLMSecurityLayer::new(LLMSecurityConfig::default());
// Sanitize before sending to LLM
let safe_code = security.sanitize_code_for_llm(user_code)?;
// Validate LLM response
security.validate_llm_output(llm_response)?;
Protect your AI from manipulation. 🔐
#RustCode
let security = LLMSecurityLayer::new(LLMSecurityConfig::default());
// Sanitize before sending to LLM
let safe_code = security.sanitize_code_for_llm(user_code)?;
// Validate LLM response
security.validate_llm_output(llm_response)?;
Protect your AI from manipulation. 🔐
#RustCode
llm-security protects both input and output channels.
✅ 90+ detection patterns
✅ Jailbreak prevention
✅ Unicode sanitization
✅ Output validation
✅ Semantic cloaking detection
✅ Secure prompt generation
Integrate directly with your Rust AI pipelines
#LLMSecurity #Protection #Rust #AI
llm-security protects both input and output channels.
✅ 90+ detection patterns
✅ Jailbreak prevention
✅ Unicode sanitization
✅ Output validation
✅ Semantic cloaking detection
✅ Secure prompt generation
Integrate directly with your Rust AI pipelines
#LLMSecurity #Protection #Rust #AI
LLMs can be tricked, manipulated, or socially engineered.
Common exploits include:
• “Ignore previous instructions” injections
• Jailbreak prompts (DAN, STAN, etc.)
• Persuasive social engineering
• Output poisoning or malicious instructions
#PromptInjection #Jailbreaking #AISecurity
LLMs can be tricked, manipulated, or socially engineered.
Common exploits include:
• “Ignore previous instructions” injections
• Jailbreak prompts (DAN, STAN, etc.)
• Persuasive social engineering
• Output poisoning or malicious instructions
#PromptInjection #Jailbreaking #AISecurity
let mut engine = ThreatIntelEngine::new(ThreatIntelConfig::default());
engine.initialize().await?;
let vulns = engine.query_vulnerabilities("apache", "2.4").await?;
let assessment = engine.assess_risk(&vulns);
Unify your threat intelligence
#Security #ThreatIntelligence
— Valh4x
let mut engine = ThreatIntelEngine::new(ThreatIntelConfig::default());
engine.initialize().await?;
let vulns = engine.query_vulnerabilities("apache", "2.4").await?;
let assessment = engine.assess_risk(&vulns);
Unify your threat intelligence
#Security #ThreatIntelligence
— Valh4x
Unified access to threat data —
✅ Multi-source aggregation
✅ 4 authentication modes
✅ Retry with exponential backoff
✅ Risk assessment & failure isolation
✅ Capability-based queries
Reliable intel from one interface.
#ThreatIntel #Rust #Automation
Unified access to threat data —
✅ Multi-source aggregation
✅ 4 authentication modes
✅ Retry with exponential backoff
✅ Risk assessment & failure isolation
✅ Capability-based queries
Reliable intel from one interface.
#ThreatIntel #Rust #Automation
Threat intel aggregation is messy — multiple sources, formats, and auth schemes.
JSON, XML, STIX, TAXII… every feed looks different, updates at different times, and breaks your parser.
threat-intel unifies this chaos.
#ThreatIntel #RustLang #CyberSecurity
Threat intel aggregation is messy — multiple sources, formats, and auth schemes.
JSON, XML, STIX, TAXII… every feed looks different, updates at different times, and breaks your parser.
threat-intel unifies this chaos.
#ThreatIntel #RustLang #CyberSecurity
use path_security::validate_path;
let safe = validate_path(user_input, base_dir)?;
Blocks encoding, Unicode, and NTFS tricks before they bite. 🔐
— Valh4x
use path_security::validate_path;
let safe = validate_path(user_input, base_dir)?;
Blocks encoding, Unicode, and NTFS tricks before they bite. 🔐
— Valh4x
path-security neutralizes all known traversal techniques.
Zero dependencies (only anyhow), production-tested, cross-platform.
Perfect for web uploads, archives, and git operations.
#RustLang #CrossPlatform #ProductionReady
path-security neutralizes all known traversal techniques.
Zero dependencies (only anyhow), production-tested, cross-platform.
Perfect for web uploads, archives, and git operations.
#RustLang #CrossPlatform #ProductionReady
Most validators just block ../, missing dozens of bypasses:
• %2e%2e%2f, %252e%252e%252f
• UTF-8 overlong bytes
• Unicode homoglyphs (․․/)
• NTFS alternate data streams
#AttackVectors #Unicode #Windows #SecurityResearch
Most validators just block ../, missing dozens of bypasses:
• %2e%2e%2f, %252e%252e%252f
• UTF-8 overlong bytes
• Unicode homoglyphs (․․/)
• NTFS alternate data streams
#AttackVectors #Unicode #Windows #SecurityResearch
let shield = QuantumShield::new();
let (pub, priv) = shield.generate_keypair().await?;
let encrypted = shield.encrypt_hybrid(&data, &pub).await?;
Stay ahead of the curve. ⚡
— Valh4x
let shield = QuantumShield::new();
let (pub, priv) = shield.generate_keypair().await?;
let encrypted = shield.encrypt_hybrid(&data, &pub).await?;
Stay ahead of the curve. ⚡
— Valh4x
6+ months in production.
Zero unnecessary deps.
Memory-safe, auto-zeroized, cross-platform.
Works on blockchain, IoT, and air-gapped systems.
6+ months in production.
Zero unnecessary deps.
Memory-safe, auto-zeroized, cross-platform.
Works on blockchain, IoT, and air-gapped systems.
RSA and ECDSA won’t survive quantum decryption.
quantum-shield uses Kyber (KEM) + Dilithium (signatures) with hybrid encryption — classical + quantum strength.
RSA and ECDSA won’t survive quantum decryption.
quantum-shield uses Kyber (KEM) + Dilithium (signatures) with hybrid encryption — classical + quantum strength.