@unionstrong-77.bsky.social
He slow walked Trumps charges? Well he’s old. He doesn’t walk as fast as he used to. Also he believed in following the customs and norms of being the President and not interfering with the AG and DOJ. I would blame right wing activist judges and SCOTUS for the slow walking
November 5, 2025 at 6:38 AM
He slow walked Trumps charges? Well he’s old. He doesn’t walk as fast as he used to. Also he believed in following the customs and norms of being the President and not interfering with the AG and DOJ. I would blame right wing activist judges and SCOTUS for the slow walking
Didn’t prevent what’s going on right now? Did you really expect him to not only fix Covid, the economy, foreign relations, and all of Trumps other messes, but also all of his messes in the future. You sound delusional.
November 5, 2025 at 6:30 AM
Didn’t prevent what’s going on right now? Did you really expect him to not only fix Covid, the economy, foreign relations, and all of Trumps other messes, but also all of his messes in the future. You sound delusional.
If you want to know what he did for the trans community it’s pretty easy to look up.
bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-roo...
bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-roo...
FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Highlights Accomplishments for LGBTQI+ Americans | The White House
President Biden and Vice President Harris have been instrumental in remedying historical injustices and advancing equality for LGBTQI+ Americans. Today,
bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov
November 5, 2025 at 6:24 AM
If you want to know what he did for the trans community it’s pretty easy to look up.
bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-roo...
bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-roo...
A President can’t “protect” Roe V Wade. Congress has to pass legislation for him to sign. They didn’t. After the SCOTUS ruling he did what he legally could with executive orders.
bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-roo...
bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-roo...
FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Continues the Fight for Reproductive Freedom | The White House
Nearly two years after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and the constitutional right to choose, millions of Americans are living under extreme
bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov
November 5, 2025 at 6:20 AM
A President can’t “protect” Roe V Wade. Congress has to pass legislation for him to sign. They didn’t. After the SCOTUS ruling he did what he legally could with executive orders.
bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-roo...
bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-roo...
You are just as delusional and as big of a liar as any MAGA voter.
November 5, 2025 at 2:30 AM
You are just as delusional and as big of a liar as any MAGA voter.
You really think it’s the Vice President that makes those decisions you muppet.
November 5, 2025 at 2:28 AM
You really think it’s the Vice President that makes those decisions you muppet.
Maybe if journalists did their job of educating the public rather than both siding everything. They seem to be more concerned about keeping access to people that lie to them, than to call out the lies.
October 28, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Maybe if journalists did their job of educating the public rather than both siding everything. They seem to be more concerned about keeping access to people that lie to them, than to call out the lies.
I bet you were just as wrong when you thought the same thing about gay people getting elected.
October 24, 2025 at 4:58 AM
I bet you were just as wrong when you thought the same thing about gay people getting elected.
So it’s not possible to talk about the east wing and SNAP, but it is possible to talk about Medicaid and SNAP. You made it sound like you could only talk about one thing.
October 23, 2025 at 3:12 PM
So it’s not possible to talk about the east wing and SNAP, but it is possible to talk about Medicaid and SNAP. You made it sound like you could only talk about one thing.
It’s not like any of those journalists asked good questions anyways. Very very few journalists anywhere actually care about informing the public of actual facts.
October 23, 2025 at 1:15 PM
It’s not like any of those journalists asked good questions anyways. Very very few journalists anywhere actually care about informing the public of actual facts.
Vote blue no matter who is for after the primaries, when the only choice is between a democrat and a republican.
October 23, 2025 at 6:22 AM
Vote blue no matter who is for after the primaries, when the only choice is between a democrat and a republican.
They do. What’s really embarrassing and needs to be called out more to their faces is the failure of journalists to do their jobs. If the public doesn’t know something or worse, believes a bunch of lies. It is the journalists that are failing at their jobs.
October 23, 2025 at 6:20 AM
They do. What’s really embarrassing and needs to be called out more to their faces is the failure of journalists to do their jobs. If the public doesn’t know something or worse, believes a bunch of lies. It is the journalists that are failing at their jobs.
You are as bad as a MAGA supporter if you blame others for what your candidate said. I bet if the so called “establishment” candidate said the exact same things your response would be totally different.
October 18, 2025 at 12:22 PM
You are as bad as a MAGA supporter if you blame others for what your candidate said. I bet if the so called “establishment” candidate said the exact same things your response would be totally different.
By “the party” do you mean individual democrats that have only one vote or no vote at all if they aren’t registered to vote in that district? Do you consider David Hogg to be a “ratfucker” by putting his Super PAC money behind the candidate he wants to win in a primary?
October 17, 2025 at 5:10 PM
By “the party” do you mean individual democrats that have only one vote or no vote at all if they aren’t registered to vote in that district? Do you consider David Hogg to be a “ratfucker” by putting his Super PAC money behind the candidate he wants to win in a primary?
By “put forth” do you mean won the democratic primary? Why do you think a person that doesn’t get the majority of votes in the primary should be “put forth” as the party candidate to run in the general election?
October 17, 2025 at 4:59 PM
By “put forth” do you mean won the democratic primary? Why do you think a person that doesn’t get the majority of votes in the primary should be “put forth” as the party candidate to run in the general election?
Quick question. How many times has a far left candidate flipped a seat from red to blue. How many bills has someone like Bernie Sanders passed that had nothing to do with renaming a post office or road?
October 17, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Quick question. How many times has a far left candidate flipped a seat from red to blue. How many bills has someone like Bernie Sanders passed that had nothing to do with renaming a post office or road?
Do you take no responsibility for dividing the party? Constantly complaining about democrats, getting the far left to stay home or vote third party when their preferred candidate doesn’t win the primary. You help suppress the vote.
October 17, 2025 at 4:16 AM
Do you take no responsibility for dividing the party? Constantly complaining about democrats, getting the far left to stay home or vote third party when their preferred candidate doesn’t win the primary. You help suppress the vote.
What exactly do you want them to do? Spend money on races they will not win over races that they can win? They also do not pour money into races that they will for sure win. Are they also abandoning those Dems? I don’t see them trying to hurt red states just because they voted red.
October 8, 2025 at 9:09 PM
What exactly do you want them to do? Spend money on races they will not win over races that they can win? They also do not pour money into races that they will for sure win. Are they also abandoning those Dems? I don’t see them trying to hurt red states just because they voted red.
She was living better than most before she became AG. Don’t know why you keep changing the subject I responded to. That she can be disbarred.
October 7, 2025 at 9:16 PM
She was living better than most before she became AG. Don’t know why you keep changing the subject I responded to. That she can be disbarred.
You can make anything happen in your fantasy land. In the real world she can still be the AG without a law license because she isn’t the one arguing the cases in court. When she is done as the AG she will not be able to get a job that requires a law license.
October 7, 2025 at 8:55 PM
You can make anything happen in your fantasy land. In the real world she can still be the AG without a law license because she isn’t the one arguing the cases in court. When she is done as the AG she will not be able to get a job that requires a law license.
It doesn’t matter if she doesn’t recognize a disbarment. She can still be disbarred.
October 7, 2025 at 7:23 PM
It doesn’t matter if she doesn’t recognize a disbarment. She can still be disbarred.
Because their preferred candidate didn’t win the primary nomination. If a progressive candidate loses we still vote for the winner, the far left stays home, votes 3rd party, or tries to suppress the vote of the progressive winner by constantly complaining about them and suppressing their vote.
October 7, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Because their preferred candidate didn’t win the primary nomination. If a progressive candidate loses we still vote for the winner, the far left stays home, votes 3rd party, or tries to suppress the vote of the progressive winner by constantly complaining about them and suppressing their vote.
Until they are 26 wouldn’t have happened. A lot of the democrats you think are just republican light, voted for the ACA knowing it would cost them their seat and they did it anyways because it was the right thing to do. The far left has cost us the SCOTUS for generations and cost us elections…
October 7, 2025 at 7:08 PM
Until they are 26 wouldn’t have happened. A lot of the democrats you think are just republican light, voted for the ACA knowing it would cost them their seat and they did it anyways because it was the right thing to do. The far left has cost us the SCOTUS for generations and cost us elections…
The ACA and “Green New Deal” would have never happened under the far left. They would only have accepted Medicaid for all. So rather than getting something better like ACA we would still have the old system with less people covered and pre existing conditions and kids staying on parents insurance…
October 7, 2025 at 7:04 PM
The ACA and “Green New Deal” would have never happened under the far left. They would only have accepted Medicaid for all. So rather than getting something better like ACA we would still have the old system with less people covered and pre existing conditions and kids staying on parents insurance…
How have they been helping. Can you name any policies they have enacted to help anyone. The progressives actually pass policies that help people while the far left just complains about progressives not doing enough and suppressing their votes, helping republicans win and setting us all back farther.
October 7, 2025 at 5:37 PM
How have they been helping. Can you name any policies they have enacted to help anyone. The progressives actually pass policies that help people while the far left just complains about progressives not doing enough and suppressing their votes, helping republicans win and setting us all back farther.