And this reformulation of the macro-container, man placed in the creation by God, is what Ghosh seems to me to be trying to do. A reformulation of man fully imbued with Indian culture and Gandhian ideology... a reformulation not irrelevant also for its non-Eurocentric origins.

and I would not be surprised if as an alternative to that enigmatic "overcoming of man" container-contained, or as an alternative to our positivistic perception of socio-cognitive development, we returned to the previous vision of man-part-of.

after Kant, after man who places himself at the center of the world as the legitimizing entity of his own reality, after anthropocentrism in short, what comes? It seems to me that the humanist debate on the climate issue calls into question precisely this;

A not insignificant factor, in addition to economic rationality, in my opinion also lies in the anthropological perception that man gives of himself. This bicentenary debate has involved the most brilliant minds that European philosophy could give us:

The ideas are already there. History will tell us if they will be successful or not; if our future will be solarpunk or cyberpunk.

The so-called rationality mutation. If Hong Kong, Mumbai and other cities are no longer suitable for a good and safe life, the investment have to abandon the commercial rationality, to migrate from the capital profitability centers and to afford some initial losses.

that event that had been expelled from history and that had contributed to guide the sedimentation of knowledge in previous eras.

A way of thinking based on the regularity of the world, on its calculability in the medium-long term. A calculability, however, that loses its empirical content with the emergence of the unpredictable climatic event;

Ghosh is now a must-read. Starting from the analysis of the "novel", a literary style born during the bourgeois century and therefore embodying its worldviews, Ghosh then moves on to the analysis of our way of thinking, a bourgeois way nonetheless.

di democrazia di base per poter costruire [...] la dittatura fascista»

Presidente della provincia di Reggio Emilia Vittorio Parenti, 1975.

Paolo Manacorda in Il lavoro possible, 1986.

E ancora, flessibilità significa poter avere un anno sabbatico o un periodo di studio o di ricerca all'estero, mentre precarietà significa che si lavora quando c'è la Fiera di Milano o le compere natalizie alla Rinascente, e non si ha lavoro nei periodi di bassa stagione.

Precarietà significa essere disponibili a lavorare quando gli altri ce lo chiedono, come accade alle babysitter, ai pony express, alle donne delle pulizie, e su di un livello certamente più dotato di ricompense [...] anche a chi fa interviste, ricerche di mercato, distribuzione di questionari...

Piacere, sono perito e dottore 😌.
P.s. le creature più bigotte che ho incontrato, invece, venivano tutte dal classico.

Lol

È un'ambigua richiesta di federalismo economico a farsi avanti, dominata [...] dall'intenzione di lasciare quanta più libertà di movimento possibile alle città e alle regioni che danno prova di inserirsi con autorevolezza nel gioco dell'economia globale.»