I think a natural origin of COVID-19 is still technically possible, in the same sense that a natural origin of the 1979 anthrax outbreak in Sverdlovsk is still "technically possible."
The late Phil Russell:
The late Phil Russell:
August 2, 2025 at 5:04 PM
I think a natural origin of COVID-19 is still technically possible, in the same sense that a natural origin of the 1979 anthrax outbreak in Sverdlovsk is still "technically possible."
The late Phil Russell:
The late Phil Russell:
I'll answer some of your questions since Jay likely doesn't have time.
1) Yes, the 2018 DEFUSE proposal is basically a blueprint for SARS-CoV-2. Insane GoF at WIV like NIH-funded 10000x growth chimeras in humanized mice in BSL2 is also obviously important evidence.
1) Yes, the 2018 DEFUSE proposal is basically a blueprint for SARS-CoV-2. Insane GoF at WIV like NIH-funded 10000x growth chimeras in humanized mice in BSL2 is also obviously important evidence.
August 2, 2025 at 4:57 PM
I'll answer some of your questions since Jay likely doesn't have time.
1) Yes, the 2018 DEFUSE proposal is basically a blueprint for SARS-CoV-2. Insane GoF at WIV like NIH-funded 10000x growth chimeras in humanized mice in BSL2 is also obviously important evidence.
1) Yes, the 2018 DEFUSE proposal is basically a blueprint for SARS-CoV-2. Insane GoF at WIV like NIH-funded 10000x growth chimeras in humanized mice in BSL2 is also obviously important evidence.