I think they all have their value and weaknesses. I was entertained by the darkness and spirtuality in 1883, the acting and European connection in 1923, and the context of understanding MAGA in Yellowstone.

Well, if you have no vision, shaping policies through opinion polls and focus groups is pretty much the only thing you can do

No surprises there: if you have a thin squad and exhaust its key members by playing them every minute of even the most meaningless games this was always going to happen...even to genetic powerhouses (what are they exactly?)

the essence of their cult: "indirect cost cross-subsidize leftitsh agendas"

A new frontier of discussion should be nanoplastics: there cannot be any question of who and what caused them, and they threaten our well being very directly: www.theguardian.com/environment/...

opposition seems to include the same argument than that against bicycle helmets: helmets don't improve car driver behaviour; SAI won't change the world's carbon usage. In both cases I think: better safe than sorry

Interesting. I still like it better here for now. I guess bad money is everywhere. Good to be critical and vigilant whatever one does and engages in. Shop in Sainsburys and money/data will go to Qatar and BlackRock...

It looks ok to me now. Is it still being funny?

Happy to be added

Agreed. Leaving is not the answer otherwise living in the bubble continues.