Thomas Worth
@tsworth.bsky.social
Visiting Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of the Pacific. University of Wisconsin-Madison PhD. Gender, US foreign policy, public opinion, international security, and gender measurement. On the job market. www.thomassworth.com
Why should we care? Some people have very legitimate reasons for hoping they don’t live long enough to be lugging around broken and battered bodies. Why do we need a clause for maybe they’ll change their mind? Maybe the other 5/6ths will change THEIR mind when they get to be that age!
November 13, 2025 at 12:13 AM
Why should we care? Some people have very legitimate reasons for hoping they don’t live long enough to be lugging around broken and battered bodies. Why do we need a clause for maybe they’ll change their mind? Maybe the other 5/6ths will change THEIR mind when they get to be that age!
Uhh, because Boomers are largely why we’re in this fucking problem to begin with. It’s not ageist to say that. Other older generations didn’t cause nearly as much damage to our country as Boomers. To say this is ageist is to bury your head in the sand.
November 13, 2025 at 12:10 AM
Uhh, because Boomers are largely why we’re in this fucking problem to begin with. It’s not ageist to say that. Other older generations didn’t cause nearly as much damage to our country as Boomers. To say this is ageist is to bury your head in the sand.
What. Do you mean “uh oh” for the Lakers? Certainly not the Blazers.
November 4, 2025 at 4:58 AM
What. Do you mean “uh oh” for the Lakers? Certainly not the Blazers.
Uhh, it’s more like Wil-lam-et, not Wu-LAM-it. Although that it much closer than Willa-met, which’s how it’s usually pronounced by outsiders.
November 3, 2025 at 2:41 AM
Uhh, it’s more like Wil-lam-et, not Wu-LAM-it. Although that it much closer than Willa-met, which’s how it’s usually pronounced by outsiders.
No there is not. Full stop. Read the fucking Constitution.
October 30, 2025 at 3:27 PM
No there is not. Full stop. Read the fucking Constitution.
Can you please properly label your graph? FFS this would get a D if one of my students submitted it.
October 27, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Can you please properly label your graph? FFS this would get a D if one of my students submitted it.
It’s because he thinks he’s playing NBA Jam—always going for the highlight dunk rather than making sure he gets the two points.
October 27, 2025 at 1:36 PM
It’s because he thinks he’s playing NBA Jam—always going for the highlight dunk rather than making sure he gets the two points.
Ok so I guess it's good to know that Jacobins are Nazi sympathizers (supporters?). And the socialist revolutionaries wonder why they constantly get ignored by Democrats...
October 24, 2025 at 11:22 PM
Ok so I guess it's good to know that Jacobins are Nazi sympathizers (supporters?). And the socialist revolutionaries wonder why they constantly get ignored by Democrats...
Reposted by Thomas Worth
yeah it is not “liberal censoriousness” to think that you shouldn’t nominate the guy without the sense to not get a nazi tattoo and then not remove it
October 21, 2025 at 1:27 PM
yeah it is not “liberal censoriousness” to think that you shouldn’t nominate the guy without the sense to not get a nazi tattoo and then not remove it