Trent Wilde
trentwilde.bsky.social
Trent Wilde
@trentwilde.bsky.social
Philosophy: materialism/corporealism; truth-based morality | Language and Texts: Ancient Canaanite; Koine Greek (just starting to learn); ancient texts related to Israel and Judaism (I'm no respecter of canonical boundaries); translation
Right - every strategy has compromises, so it depends on the translation goals. I agree that other options are better at avoiding a non-serious tone. If one prioritizes consistency across instances of a given word, then תהו needs to be rendered "waste" or the like, which limits the options for בהו.
October 10, 2025 at 4:02 PM
I agree that "waste" is the best English transation of תהו, and I actually really like shwaste lol. Although I'd choose "waste and shmaste" (going full shm-reduplication). If בהו was neologized specifically for wordplay with תהו, why not?
October 10, 2025 at 2:47 PM
Also... here's how it would look on a sample text:
July 24, 2025 at 11:55 PM
In the reconstructions I've seen of Iron Age Canaanite, I haven't seen /ɛ/, but segol could obviously be used if there is evidence of it in the dialects and periods I'm interested in.
July 24, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Also interesting to note that A32.90 has a high concentration of defective spelling - makes me wonder if it preserves an older form of the text as compared to the Leningrad Codex and other mss.
July 7, 2025 at 12:58 AM
I'm not familiar with Qimhian, but I'm pulling up some info on it and so far it looks nicely systematic. For the past several months I've been trying to read with reconstructed 1TP vowels. There's a lot to keep track of and I have a lot to still learn.
April 23, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Good stuff! I find it's relatively easy to read the HB with historical consonants, but the vowels are a bit more of a challenge. How do you pronounce the vowels when reading the HB - modern? tiberian? reconstructed?
April 23, 2025 at 6:38 PM
This is great! Thanks for making and posting it. Do you have sources you'd recommend for pre-exilic pronunciation beyond the work of Huehnergard, Kantor, Suchard, and your own work?
March 29, 2025 at 11:51 PM
Thanks for the info on that!
March 28, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Thanks - the date matters. I thought there were Aramaic texts from 9th cent. but maybe that's an old view, and maybe still too late. The ivory comb may support pre-shift Canaanite orthography. I also thought matres lectionis went form Aramaic to Canaanite, but just checked and see this may not be.
March 27, 2025 at 11:01 PM
I'm one person who appreciates what y'all do. Too few people know about your podcast and about science-based medicine in general. I've shared it with some and will share it with more. Be encouraged - you're making a difference :)
March 26, 2025 at 12:27 AM