Immediately changes into an identical 62 jersey
Just shouting the obvious (🤡 ACIP excepted) into the void: we identify life-saving therapies through active control RCTs all the time. Eg effective therapies for cancer exist, we cannot withhold them to study new treatments.
Does he demand a randomized clinical trial showing that there are zero possible adverse events to any of these actions?
Just shouting the obvious (🤡 ACIP excepted) into the void: we identify life-saving therapies through active control RCTs all the time. Eg effective therapies for cancer exist, we cannot withhold them to study new treatments.
"prediction: use of "AI" [...] will come to be broadly associated with cheating, deception, lack of respect for other people, and low quality work that cannot be trusted in important settings"
"prediction: use of "AI" [...] will come to be broadly associated with cheating, deception, lack of respect for other people, and low quality work that cannot be trusted in important settings"
Take brain cancer: lifetime risk is around .5%. Picture an LLM which detects 100% of cancers and correctly calls "no cancer" 99% of the time when it is absent. Sounds good right? Not really: 67% of the time it says you have cancer when you don't.
Take brain cancer: lifetime risk is around .5%. Picture an LLM which detects 100% of cancers and correctly calls "no cancer" 99% of the time when it is absent. Sounds good right? Not really: 67% of the time it says you have cancer when you don't.
Specifically about Jay Bhattacharya's twin from times past, Trofim Lysenko.
open.substack.com/pub/rasmusse...