TracyGlover@bluesky.com
banner
tracyglover.bsky.social
TracyGlover@bluesky.com
@tracyglover.bsky.social
A girl from Scotland. Moved to California in 1980. Love our country. Love democrats 💙. Love kindness and compassion. Love music it helps my soul..
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
Sure, Jan…
December 2, 2025 at 12:16 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
December 2, 2025 at 8:29 AM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
Over on x, David sacks is melting down about The New York Times reporting on his many conflicts of interest
December 2, 2025 at 12:49 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
Reporter: “You said that the follow-up strike was lawful. What law is it that allows no survivors?”

Leavitt: “The strike conducted on September 2 was conducted in self-defense to protect Americans and vital United States interests…And in accordance with the law of armed conflict.”
December 1, 2025 at 7:16 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
War crime cover-ups, MRI cover-ups, unlawfully practicing U.S. attorneys, and more. Watch the MeidasTouch podcast live now!
LIVE: MeidasTouch RESPONDS to MAJOR BREAKING NEWS - 12/1/25
YouTube video by MeidasTouch
www.youtube.com
December 2, 2025 at 12:59 AM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
Phang: It just underscores how much this Trump administration has destroyed any concept of public safety — that federal cases cannot be prosecuted in the state of New Jersey because Alina Haba refuses to actually step away from this bullshit.
December 2, 2025 at 2:24 AM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
These boat strikes will be nothing compared to the war crimes they will commit after they initiate regime change to seize Venezuelan oil companies.
December 2, 2025 at 3:56 AM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
Q: You said that second strike was in accordance with the law of armed conflict, but the Navy's own manual says that firing on survivors from a wrecked vessel is an example of a war crime

LEAVITT: I would reiterate that the strike was conducted in accordance with the law of armed conflict
December 1, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
@markhertling.bsky.social: “When you're talking about striking against someone who's wounded and clinging to debris…Deliberately targeting such a person isn't a tactical decision, it's a war crime by the Geneva Convention, the laws of land warfare, and the U.N. Charter.”
December 2, 2025 at 12:50 AM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
Cancelling reports.
Calling reporters stupid.
Covering things with gold.
Picking on Kimmel.

-Trump

#FuckFacts #ScienceBeGone #TrustMeBro
December 1, 2025 at 11:59 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
America: Did you order the code Red?

Hegseth: YOU’RE GODDAM RIGHT I DID!

America: Uhm, it’s a crime.

Hegseth: Ok, someone else ordered the Code Red.
December 2, 2025 at 6:37 AM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
December 2, 2025 at 12:03 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
Not that I want him to do them but Trump has barely done any rallies since he won, and I think that’s part of why he has been fumbling on how to talk about things.
December 1, 2025 at 1:26 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
💯 this. Trump believes he’s untouchable, that he’s above the law, and that he will never be held accountable for what he does. And most everyone in my former political party has learned from Trump and mimics Trump. Bcuz they now believe the same. 💯 this.👇
Trump, Hegseth, and the rest of them are so sure they're never going to be held accountable for their crimes, and I believe it's fundamentally important to this country that we prove some things still fucking matter.
December 1, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
December 1, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
Kelly: He runs around on stage talking about lethality and the warrior ethos.. That’s not the message that should be coming from the Secretary of Defense… He runs around on a stage like he’s a 12 year old playing army. It’s embarrassing.
December 1, 2025 at 9:12 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
🚨BREAKING: Alina Habba, a former personal attorney to President Donald Trump, has been unlawfully serving as New Jersey’s top federal prosecutor for months, an appeals court panel unanimously ruled Monday. www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/...
Appeals Court Disqualifies former Trump Lawyer Alina Habba as New Jersey’s Top Federal Prosecutor
Read more here.
www.democracydocket.com
December 1, 2025 at 3:08 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
Q: “Why won't the administration either confirm or deny…whether or not there were survivors after that initial first strike?”

Leavitt: “Admiral Bradley worked well within his authority and the law, directing the engagement to ensure the boat was totally destroyed.”
December 1, 2025 at 7:33 PM
no he wasn't
Reporter: Admiral Bradley was the one who gave that order for a second strike? 

Leavitt: And he was well within his authority to do so.
December 1, 2025 at 7:41 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
For MAGA, Trump replaces country.
December 1, 2025 at 2:58 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
⚖️ DoD Law of War Manual, page 1075:

"For example, orders to fire upon the shipwrecked would be clearly illegal."

ogc.osd.mil/Portals/99/d...
December 1, 2025 at 4:08 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
No Habba job. Sad!
Breaking News: A federal court said that Alina Habba, a Trump-appointed lawyer, had been serving unlawfully as the U.S. attorney in New Jersey. She was neither confirmed by the Senate nor appointed by district trial court judges — the two traditional pathways.
Appeals Court Says Alina Habba, Former Trump Lawyer, Is Serving Unlawfully as U.S. Attorney
The judges wrote that the Trump Administration appeared to have become frustrated by legal and political barriers that have prevented its preferred U.S. attorneys from leading federal prosecutors’ offices.
nyti.ms
December 1, 2025 at 4:56 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
Donald, on his way—again—to the golf course to bring down prices at the grocery store for us. What a selfless hero.
December 1, 2025 at 5:18 PM
Reposted by TracyGlover@bluesky.com
“I have absolutely no idea which part of my body the MRI was looking at. BUT I’M 1000% SURE IT WASN’T THE BRAIN!!!”

It was the brain, if only to see if he has one.
December 1, 2025 at 7:34 PM