@congressmanboyle.bsky.social it’s hard to not see this as purely performative when you don’t call for change in leadership.
Schumer is saying “now the Republicans own this.” They didn’t before? What is different now?
Schumer is saying “now the Republicans own this.” They didn’t before? What is different now?
November 10, 2025 at 9:27 PM
@congressmanboyle.bsky.social it’s hard to not see this as purely performative when you don’t call for change in leadership.
Schumer is saying “now the Republicans own this.” They didn’t before? What is different now?
Schumer is saying “now the Republicans own this.” They didn’t before? What is different now?
Every. Damn. Time.
November 10, 2025 at 8:30 PM
Every. Damn. Time.
The kicking up of dust around the Auschwitz float creator's motivation should never be presented as evidence of ambiguity or unknowability. It should be stated clearly that the [many] proffered explanations are an obvious evasion.
For whatever good it might (or might not) do, I told the author such
For whatever good it might (or might not) do, I told the author such
November 3, 2025 at 5:46 PM
The kicking up of dust around the Auschwitz float creator's motivation should never be presented as evidence of ambiguity or unknowability. It should be stated clearly that the [many] proffered explanations are an obvious evasion.
For whatever good it might (or might not) do, I told the author such
For whatever good it might (or might not) do, I told the author such
I mean, they are open and honest about having shitty opinions
October 30, 2025 at 7:46 PM
I mean, they are open and honest about having shitty opinions
Is Starfleet behind this??
October 15, 2025 at 11:57 AM
Is Starfleet behind this??
In a piece penned by this man about how he felt taken for a ride by the therapy reality show — where his experience differed from what he hoped and he felt the recordings edited to misrepresent things — why on earth did he *again* say yes to something like these photographs??
October 12, 2025 at 11:02 AM
In a piece penned by this man about how he felt taken for a ride by the therapy reality show — where his experience differed from what he hoped and he felt the recordings edited to misrepresent things — why on earth did he *again* say yes to something like these photographs??
Think Tank is an all-time great supervillain, of course
September 17, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Think Tank is an all-time great supervillain, of course
I am embarrassed to admit that I didn't know this is what a 'supermajority' meant until now
September 16, 2025 at 9:41 PM
I am embarrassed to admit that I didn't know this is what a 'supermajority' meant until now
Was this the idea?
July 9, 2025 at 2:00 AM
Was this the idea?
I don't love TEDX-style weddings – it's not tradition in my family – but to each their own.
However, "[Guests] were sent a spreadsheet listing the other guests and their LinkedIn profiles" is maybe one degree from the Linkedin meme
However, "[Guests] were sent a spreadsheet listing the other guests and their LinkedIn profiles" is maybe one degree from the Linkedin meme
June 20, 2025 at 10:02 PM
I don't love TEDX-style weddings – it's not tradition in my family – but to each their own.
However, "[Guests] were sent a spreadsheet listing the other guests and their LinkedIn profiles" is maybe one degree from the Linkedin meme
However, "[Guests] were sent a spreadsheet listing the other guests and their LinkedIn profiles" is maybe one degree from the Linkedin meme
Humbly suggesting that this account become the Grok of Bluesky.
June 16, 2025 at 4:04 PM
Humbly suggesting that this account become the Grok of Bluesky.
Okay, has anyone actually checked that this account isn't just BlueSky Grok?
June 16, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Okay, has anyone actually checked that this account isn't just BlueSky Grok?
I think there were likely many better photos, but you can feel free to use any of these.
June 16, 2025 at 3:50 AM
I think there were likely many better photos, but you can feel free to use any of these.
this was the NYT photo from this weekend
June 16, 2025 at 3:07 AM
this was the NYT photo from this weekend
This is from pride
June 16, 2025 at 3:07 AM
This is from pride
When creating a new post, you can set it to everyone, no one, or restrict it to some overlapping set of other options. It often helps folks who otherwise have to deal with spam/jerks/etc limit the engagement to people they want to interact with.
May 28, 2025 at 4:49 PM
When creating a new post, you can set it to everyone, no one, or restrict it to some overlapping set of other options. It often helps folks who otherwise have to deal with spam/jerks/etc limit the engagement to people they want to interact with.
He has his posts set to only allow for those following him AND those he follows to comment.
May 28, 2025 at 4:47 PM
He has his posts set to only allow for those following him AND those he follows to comment.
@fetterman.senate.gov
Two things can be true: PA voters are glad you got help AND we need you to do the job. Claiming people are shaming you for getting help because you refuse to do the job you ran for and were elected to do isn’t helping anyone. It’s not better that you’re choosing to phone it in
Two things can be true: PA voters are glad you got help AND we need you to do the job. Claiming people are shaming you for getting help because you refuse to do the job you ran for and were elected to do isn’t helping anyone. It’s not better that you’re choosing to phone it in
May 24, 2025 at 11:15 AM
@fetterman.senate.gov
Two things can be true: PA voters are glad you got help AND we need you to do the job. Claiming people are shaming you for getting help because you refuse to do the job you ran for and were elected to do isn’t helping anyone. It’s not better that you’re choosing to phone it in
Two things can be true: PA voters are glad you got help AND we need you to do the job. Claiming people are shaming you for getting help because you refuse to do the job you ran for and were elected to do isn’t helping anyone. It’s not better that you’re choosing to phone it in
For me, the actual gameplay doesn't live up to the art direction in the OG trailer or this
April 12, 2025 at 7:21 PM
For me, the actual gameplay doesn't live up to the art direction in the OG trailer or this
I know it's tired to complain about graphics, but the OG trailer looked so cool. The AO and lighting look fine for a MP shooter, but don't serve the art like I'd hoped. And not being SP, I'm sad we'll only see Technicolor junkyards and not cool SP level designs as in Halo, but with this art. Bummer.
April 12, 2025 at 6:53 PM
I know it's tired to complain about graphics, but the OG trailer looked so cool. The AO and lighting look fine for a MP shooter, but don't serve the art like I'd hoped. And not being SP, I'm sad we'll only see Technicolor junkyards and not cool SP level designs as in Halo, but with this art. Bummer.
His name is Benny. He has never met a person he doesn’t love, he loves government services (the USPS guy gives him snacks), and he’s always up for a march, even if his four braincells don’t allow for total comprehension of why there’s a march
April 12, 2025 at 5:58 PM
His name is Benny. He has never met a person he doesn’t love, he loves government services (the USPS guy gives him snacks), and he’s always up for a march, even if his four braincells don’t allow for total comprehension of why there’s a march