Timothy Jackson
banner
tnwjackson.bsky.social
Timothy Jackson
@tnwjackson.bsky.social
Chemical ecology, philosophy, music, wildlife, etc.
Ooooh. Will have to try and check that out, thanks!
November 12, 2025 at 1:35 AM
Potentially! He's also, two sentences after the Cincinnatus reference, saying "..A regulative relation of circular causality
cannot be established between the whole of governed reality and the function of authority...." this is an argument against a pure top-down authority.
June 15, 2025 at 5:19 AM
Mystification is something that is often, but not exclusively, intentionally done by those using it to wield power. This is the antithesis of what Simondon is calling for.
June 15, 2025 at 5:17 AM
As I said it might be a naïve program. But he's very clearly not saying the technocrats should lead the world. He's saying general education can help us ensure they don't.....and he may indeed be wrong about that.
June 15, 2025 at 5:06 AM
This is the point - Simondon is calling for a demystification of the customers. So that they are not so easily preyed upon by the technocrats. This is the whole thesis of re-integrating technicity into culture via generalised technology (which means the knowledge of technicity, for him).
June 15, 2025 at 4:58 AM
Gaining technical knowledge in a number of scientific fields is a wonderful way to demystify this stuff. Hence Simondon's call for a reform of education.
June 15, 2025 at 4:50 AM
...cf. theoretical physics, but basically the legacy of the mechanical philosophy tout court. It's been a genuinely huge problem for the world, and continues to be, that a mystified form of theology masquerading as the "objective truth" have overdetermined our sense of our place in the cosmos.
June 15, 2025 at 4:49 AM
....general education. That we treat technicity as distinct from (alienated from) the rest of culture is part of the problem, for him. This enables the technocratic class to emerge, with their "drive" (or "idolatry") of/for power. This is not unrelated to a general mystification of science....
June 15, 2025 at 4:48 AM
Again where I think it becomes useful (not only here, but) is in tracking the relationship between the mystification of technologies and this "drive towards machines". Simondon is saying we're going to be overwhelmed by technocrats if we don't integrate technicity back into human culture via....
June 15, 2025 at 4:46 AM
There are Hegelian aspects to his thought. But it's also important to understand why he doesn't consider the individuation schema "dialectical". I think whether he acutely (pre)diagnoses RW accelerationism or not is a distinct question from whether he is giving off "technocratic fascist" vibes.
June 15, 2025 at 4:45 AM
....LLMs (just to take one obvious example) do a lot more damage, culturally, to the extent that they are mystified. And there is a huge amount of mystification of LLMs coming out of the tech/data science sector itself right now.
June 15, 2025 at 4:42 AM
....of aspects to this. And of course the call for a "general technical education" might be naïve if we imagine it's going to redress the issues we're currently faced with (especially at this point!). But I think there's something important in Simondon's diagnosis here nonetheless. And certainly....
June 15, 2025 at 4:41 AM
And I don't see the current technocracy in the way you do, seemingly, either. I think it feeds very heavy on our general lack of technical knowledge. That we don't know how the vast amount of technology we're engaging with works, we are "alienated" by it for this reason. There are a number....
June 15, 2025 at 4:39 AM
So I'm certainly not getting any "technocracy fascism vibes" myself. That's why I provided the quote where he explicitly decries exactly that - technocracy and the desire for absolute power.
June 15, 2025 at 4:38 AM
....to its costs and the results of its operation." - it's certainly possible that Simondon misdiagnosed the nature of the contemporary technocracy, which arose decades after he wrote this book. But its very clear that he's decrying technocracy, and any attempts at absolute or abstract power.
June 15, 2025 at 4:36 AM
Elon is more like someone "Running a company that uses machines," which is "no more useful for the attainment of his awareness than is labor: it creates abstract points of view regarding the machine, causing it to be judged, not in its own right, but according....
June 15, 2025 at 4:35 AM
....fascination with automatons/autonomous machines, made in the image of the human. He's warning against this fantasy - machines are within the human lifeworld and require human regulation/mediation.
June 15, 2025 at 4:20 AM
....The desire for power consecrates the machine as a means of supremacy, it makes of it a modern philter. The man who wants to dominate his peers calls the android machine into being." - he's very explicitly warning *against* technocracy. The obsession with the "idea of the robot" is about the....
June 15, 2025 at 4:19 AM
🙏
June 12, 2025 at 3:09 AM
...events, i.e. as though they have essences associated with specific functions to which they can be more or less adapted (like a tool in a specific sociocultural assemblage).

Where do these quotes you're pulling come from?
June 11, 2025 at 11:49 PM
...model to natural objects (the classic cybernetic and adaptationist confusion), which would actually throw us back onto hylomorphism. Recalling that hylomorphism is precisely a *technical* schema inappropriately applied to natural objects as though the latter are the result of "special creation"..
June 11, 2025 at 11:48 PM
..."concretisation", because they are always-already concrete. Concretisation is the analogous process undergone by *technical* objects. And they are subject to a convergence to the extent that they are optimised for a specific purpose. But it would be a confusion to apply this optimisation....
June 11, 2025 at 11:47 PM
....pre-individual "charge". In very basic thermodynamic terms, it can do more "work" - it is more metastable because it has internalised more gradients/tensions that are subject to differential canalisation. A key point here being that "natural objects" are not subject to a process of.....
June 11, 2025 at 11:46 PM
...is *not* some "final unification" on offer. A system that "envelops and compatibilises" more pre-individual "difference" within itself has a greater capacity for *ongoing* individuation. It can become more things - in a context-elicited manner - than a system which incorporates less of that....
June 11, 2025 at 11:44 PM