I mean saying someone wrote a critique out of emotion and calling someone a big or not the same. My evidence is the sentence I keep referring too. I didn't write a 1000 word blog.

Sure and I wasn't trying to say what you think is wrong. It's just notable that as soon as Graber falls out of favour with a group of users immediately lengthy blog posts emerge discrediting her work. Is it not toxic as fuck?

We can keep going in circles if you want, man. I think the author soured the piece and ruined its credibility when they said essentially "Graber is a transphobe. Source? I made it up."

They used Graber controversial Waffles post for one. I get the criticism of the protocol that it will never be as open at Bluesky says but you can't allege people are bigots just because you feel like it and put it out there as gospel.

Fuck cancer