@thishere-n-of-one.bsky.social
Exactly. Front-line workers also have to deal with the workslop of co-workers.
If your starting assumption is that the current “AGI” models are good and useful, then more use is better.
But so much reporting takes that assumption as a given.
If your starting assumption is that the current “AGI” models are good and useful, then more use is better.
But so much reporting takes that assumption as a given.
November 29, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Exactly. Front-line workers also have to deal with the workslop of co-workers.
If your starting assumption is that the current “AGI” models are good and useful, then more use is better.
But so much reporting takes that assumption as a given.
If your starting assumption is that the current “AGI” models are good and useful, then more use is better.
But so much reporting takes that assumption as a given.
Compare with my friend’s plate, browned as God intended. (I complimented it thinking he had made it; it was made by a black woman lmao. Game recognizes game).
November 29, 2025 at 8:58 PM
Compare with my friend’s plate, browned as God intended. (I complimented it thinking he had made it; it was made by a black woman lmao. Game recognizes game).
So is this a user prompt error?
These are from the ID subs on reddit. Will “practice” bring one closer to “perfection”?
(Believing that a rattlesnake is a gopher snake might bring one closer to god!)
These are from the ID subs on reddit. Will “practice” bring one closer to “perfection”?
(Believing that a rattlesnake is a gopher snake might bring one closer to god!)
November 27, 2025 at 7:58 PM
So is this a user prompt error?
These are from the ID subs on reddit. Will “practice” bring one closer to “perfection”?
(Believing that a rattlesnake is a gopher snake might bring one closer to god!)
These are from the ID subs on reddit. Will “practice” bring one closer to “perfection”?
(Believing that a rattlesnake is a gopher snake might bring one closer to god!)
Reefer Madness, but make it “Smart Brevity”
November 26, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Reefer Madness, but make it “Smart Brevity”
Post histories are so illuminating.
November 24, 2025 at 5:44 PM
Post histories are so illuminating.
It appears as a minor mention in the excellent e-book Japanese Soul Cooking. It uses the word “hane,” or wings.
The e-book is recent but seems based in traditional techniques, as it highlights regional variations.
So my guess is a traditional variation that got inflated for social media.
The e-book is recent but seems based in traditional techniques, as it highlights regional variations.
So my guess is a traditional variation that got inflated for social media.
November 24, 2025 at 5:34 PM
It appears as a minor mention in the excellent e-book Japanese Soul Cooking. It uses the word “hane,” or wings.
The e-book is recent but seems based in traditional techniques, as it highlights regional variations.
So my guess is a traditional variation that got inflated for social media.
The e-book is recent but seems based in traditional techniques, as it highlights regional variations.
So my guess is a traditional variation that got inflated for social media.
In 2000, if you avoided the temptation of the NASDAQ, you were relatively safe.
Today the Mag 7 dominate the S&P—a much broader index that is part of everybody’s portfolios. And your exposure is huge if you own a weighted index fund.
Not an index fund, but I looked at Contrafund, a ginormous fund:
Today the Mag 7 dominate the S&P—a much broader index that is part of everybody’s portfolios. And your exposure is huge if you own a weighted index fund.
Not an index fund, but I looked at Contrafund, a ginormous fund:
November 15, 2025 at 8:15 PM
In 2000, if you avoided the temptation of the NASDAQ, you were relatively safe.
Today the Mag 7 dominate the S&P—a much broader index that is part of everybody’s portfolios. And your exposure is huge if you own a weighted index fund.
Not an index fund, but I looked at Contrafund, a ginormous fund:
Today the Mag 7 dominate the S&P—a much broader index that is part of everybody’s portfolios. And your exposure is huge if you own a weighted index fund.
Not an index fund, but I looked at Contrafund, a ginormous fund:
This was the ridiculous sub-head I saw:
November 15, 2025 at 3:32 AM
This was the ridiculous sub-head I saw:
Everybody is talking about that gross Livvy story but meanwhile the real NYT is out-jerking the NYT headline bot:
November 14, 2025 at 8:11 PM
Everybody is talking about that gross Livvy story but meanwhile the real NYT is out-jerking the NYT headline bot:
OMG thank you! I subscribe to Apple News, which provides an “interesting” mix of media.
I got obsessed with screenshotting the ridiculous DOGE check headlines in regional/national media.
This practice of credulously quoting these clowns in headlines needs to stop.
I got obsessed with screenshotting the ridiculous DOGE check headlines in regional/national media.
This practice of credulously quoting these clowns in headlines needs to stop.
November 12, 2025 at 6:48 PM
OMG thank you! I subscribe to Apple News, which provides an “interesting” mix of media.
I got obsessed with screenshotting the ridiculous DOGE check headlines in regional/national media.
This practice of credulously quoting these clowns in headlines needs to stop.
I got obsessed with screenshotting the ridiculous DOGE check headlines in regional/national media.
This practice of credulously quoting these clowns in headlines needs to stop.
The Boston Dynamics dog robot:
November 11, 2025 at 10:02 PM
The Boston Dynamics dog robot:
Maybe he was actually on Indeed here:
November 11, 2025 at 9:01 PM
Maybe he was actually on Indeed here:
Kind of like those 5000 DOGE checks the media were credulously talking about for months.
November 6, 2025 at 4:09 PM
Kind of like those 5000 DOGE checks the media were credulously talking about for months.
I despise that writing style, and it just proves the point that writing is thinking, and stuffing shit into bullet points is not.
It’s like the powerpoint Challenger disaster all over again.
Also, I noticed this on Apple News around midnight Tuesday night—they called the NJ election wrong.
It’s like the powerpoint Challenger disaster all over again.
Also, I noticed this on Apple News around midnight Tuesday night—they called the NJ election wrong.
November 6, 2025 at 3:40 PM
I despise that writing style, and it just proves the point that writing is thinking, and stuffing shit into bullet points is not.
It’s like the powerpoint Challenger disaster all over again.
Also, I noticed this on Apple News around midnight Tuesday night—they called the NJ election wrong.
It’s like the powerpoint Challenger disaster all over again.
Also, I noticed this on Apple News around midnight Tuesday night—they called the NJ election wrong.
“We all saw it coming”
November 5, 2025 at 4:09 PM
“We all saw it coming”
Dumb brevity strikes again
November 5, 2025 at 5:40 AM
Dumb brevity strikes again
I’m about to reply more generally about my concerns about these plans, but this screenshot from the link is a good summary: these plans are “cheaper than ACA plans” because they are medically underwritten.
Medical underwriting goes to the heart of why the ACA was needed.
Medical underwriting goes to the heart of why the ACA was needed.
October 20, 2025 at 8:41 PM
I’m about to reply more generally about my concerns about these plans, but this screenshot from the link is a good summary: these plans are “cheaper than ACA plans” because they are medically underwritten.
Medical underwriting goes to the heart of why the ACA was needed.
Medical underwriting goes to the heart of why the ACA was needed.
When you’re on deadline and the only internet jargon you know are “troll” and “copypasta.”
September 13, 2025 at 12:04 AM
When you’re on deadline and the only internet jargon you know are “troll” and “copypasta.”
Had this exchange in March with an ag extension guy in my rural ag-heavy county:
April 4, 2025 at 12:45 AM
Had this exchange in March with an ag extension guy in my rural ag-heavy county: