The Rose
@therose.bsky.social
Writer, actor and artist from Canada
29
He/him
29
He/him
You aren't presenting them. You're telling me to "look it up yourself" which puts you in an unverifiable position. If I find something to argue against, you can just say that I'm not finding the right thing. You made a claim. Back it the fuck up coward.
November 28, 2025 at 10:32 PM
You aren't presenting them. You're telling me to "look it up yourself" which puts you in an unverifiable position. If I find something to argue against, you can just say that I'm not finding the right thing. You made a claim. Back it the fuck up coward.
Still not giving me the wording. Really makes it seem like you're being dishonest
November 28, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Still not giving me the wording. Really makes it seem like you're being dishonest
I find it interesting how much you're abstracting the praise. What did she say EXACTLY?
November 28, 2025 at 9:48 PM
I find it interesting how much you're abstracting the praise. What did she say EXACTLY?
No one buys this, everything the donation money is for is up on the website. You're convincing no one with this crap lol
November 28, 2025 at 7:33 PM
No one buys this, everything the donation money is for is up on the website. You're convincing no one with this crap lol
If they can win, yes; as long as it doesn't take resources from those currently in a position to affect progressive change NOW
November 28, 2025 at 7:30 PM
If they can win, yes; as long as it doesn't take resources from those currently in a position to affect progressive change NOW
Right, so she praised him for his work in black communities specifically. That's not antisemitic.
November 27, 2025 at 11:59 PM
Right, so she praised him for his work in black communities specifically. That's not antisemitic.
www.orygen.org.au
November 27, 2025 at 11:54 PM
Some people like yourself refuse to listen to facts, true. This doesn't change reality though.
November 27, 2025 at 11:15 PM
Some people like yourself refuse to listen to facts, true. This doesn't change reality though.
Factually incorrect.
November 27, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Factually incorrect.
Blatantly false. There is plenty of data on the improvements caused by gender affirming care. As I said, it has a lower regret rate than most surgeries.
November 27, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Blatantly false. There is plenty of data on the improvements caused by gender affirming care. As I said, it has a lower regret rate than most surgeries.
They are given to treat conditions, and gender dysphoria is a medical condition. Your personal opinion on the matter is irrelevant to the scientific consensus.
November 27, 2025 at 11:13 PM
They are given to treat conditions, and gender dysphoria is a medical condition. Your personal opinion on the matter is irrelevant to the scientific consensus.
The percentage of de-transitioners is lower than the rate of regret for most surgeries. Also, most de-transition due to social pressure or monetary reasons.
November 27, 2025 at 11:12 PM
The percentage of de-transitioners is lower than the rate of regret for most surgeries. Also, most de-transition due to social pressure or monetary reasons.
That's what the puberty blockers are for. They're taken until a certain age, then the patient is old enough to decide whether they want to go further or not.
November 27, 2025 at 11:11 PM
That's what the puberty blockers are for. They're taken until a certain age, then the patient is old enough to decide whether they want to go further or not.
Some cancer drugs, prostate drugs, psychiatric drugs and anti-seizure medicines can cause bone loss.
corticosteroids and chemotherapy also disrupt immune function.
I don't see you looking to ban any of those.
corticosteroids and chemotherapy also disrupt immune function.
I don't see you looking to ban any of those.
November 27, 2025 at 11:10 PM
Some cancer drugs, prostate drugs, psychiatric drugs and anti-seizure medicines can cause bone loss.
corticosteroids and chemotherapy also disrupt immune function.
I don't see you looking to ban any of those.
corticosteroids and chemotherapy also disrupt immune function.
I don't see you looking to ban any of those.
Yeah, those were other examples of accepted medicines that have side effects. As I said.
The purpose is to disrupt certain kinds of sexual development. That's literally the purpose. This has been proven to be beneficial for most people who do it.
The purpose is to disrupt certain kinds of sexual development. That's literally the purpose. This has been proven to be beneficial for most people who do it.
November 27, 2025 at 11:06 PM
Yeah, those were other examples of accepted medicines that have side effects. As I said.
The purpose is to disrupt certain kinds of sexual development. That's literally the purpose. This has been proven to be beneficial for most people who do it.
The purpose is to disrupt certain kinds of sexual development. That's literally the purpose. This has been proven to be beneficial for most people who do it.
This is referencing the cass report as if it's a worthwhile study. It isn't.
November 27, 2025 at 10:55 PM
This is referencing the cass report as if it's a worthwhile study. It isn't.
Cool, a lot of scary wording to say that there isn't evidence for harm, and where there is, it can be mitigated.
All medication has side effects. Everything from tylenol to cancer treatment has side effects. The point is for the patient to decide whether the benefits outweigh the potential harm.
All medication has side effects. Everything from tylenol to cancer treatment has side effects. The point is for the patient to decide whether the benefits outweigh the potential harm.
November 27, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Cool, a lot of scary wording to say that there isn't evidence for harm, and where there is, it can be mitigated.
All medication has side effects. Everything from tylenol to cancer treatment has side effects. The point is for the patient to decide whether the benefits outweigh the potential harm.
All medication has side effects. Everything from tylenol to cancer treatment has side effects. The point is for the patient to decide whether the benefits outweigh the potential harm.
Following scientific methodology isn't a cliche.
November 27, 2025 at 10:50 PM
Following scientific methodology isn't a cliche.
That's a whole lot of asserting, appealing to nature, self contradiction, and baseless claims to fit on just one page. Impressive.
November 27, 2025 at 10:49 PM
That's a whole lot of asserting, appealing to nature, self contradiction, and baseless claims to fit on just one page. Impressive.
No long term harm had been demonstrated. Benefits however are proven.
November 27, 2025 at 10:37 PM
No long term harm had been demonstrated. Benefits however are proven.
This is demonstrably not true. Gender affirming care has firmly established benefits. You can ignore that all you want, but don't pretend that you're being scientific.
November 27, 2025 at 10:36 PM
This is demonstrably not true. Gender affirming care has firmly established benefits. You can ignore that all you want, but don't pretend that you're being scientific.