Functionally, no. There may be some compatibility with very light 3DS games, but even that's questionable.

Which would still be breaking the NDA.

Okay, okay, sure, but you agree DC is the greatest city in the country, don't you?

This is creating a world wherein Michelle, Stephanie, and DJ dread grampa Biff coming for Christmas because he won't stop using slurs because he thinks Uncle Jesse is Italian.

Look, bulldozing homeless camps takes a lot of time and energy, what's he supposed to do?

I suspect it's just a shoddily constructed product that they slapped a low max weight on so when it invariably falls apart, they can blame it on the user rather than it being a shitty bed.

But my larger point was that we should be critical when stories only present part of the information to elicit a specific response.

The Bloomberg piece being quoted by OP covers both aspects of the story, OP omitted the part that *may* exculpate Rockstar of union-busting. That's worth noting.

Christ, that last sentence was a mess.

The employees are being accused of sharing information with a 3rd party—that's the violation that supposedly got them fired. I've been under NDA for a job before; it doesn't only apply if something bad happens with the information once it's been disclosed.

That's a good point, "leaking" is unfairly evocative; the fired employees are claimed to have been *sharing* confidential information outside of Rockstar.

The purportedly shared information not being further disseminated by the 3rd parties it was shared with wouldn't invalidate it being shared.

Holds a full size mattress and 220lb max weight because they know there will never be more than one person in that bed.

Not that the union that most people are hearing about because of this story might also have an incentive to present the story a certain way?

Unions are great, and if Rockstar employees want to unionize, good on them, but they 100% will lie their asses off when it benefits them.

Why should that stop anyone from jumping to the conclusions they want to jump to?

Just like why should the reporting that the employees were leaking private information be mentioned if it opposes the narrative that it's 100%, definitely union-busting.

It's not a great sign that we're getting "staff was maybe fired due to threats of unionizing" but not "staff was maybe discussing private information in an open forum"

spags is gonna design a blitz thats illegal in 9 states and hit bo nix so hard he grows a third kidney

“the mystery vat of assorted nautical goo”

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s...

bsky.app/profile/brig...

100%. I'll have to see if the gas station has an egregiously overpriced single serve bag to try them, but there's no way I'm bringing a bulk sized bag into my house.

They're confident that the cowardly ass mainstream media will just uncritically repeat the talking point that it's democrats' fault.

Which, as things to be confident about go, it's not the least probable outcome.