Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
banner
thebulletin.org
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
@thebulletin.org
9.7K followers 88 following 710 posts
The best thinking on existential threats since 1945. Nuclear risk, climate change, and disruptive technologies. We set the #DoomsdayClock. thebulletin.org
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
What would happen if Chicago were the target of a nuclear bomb?

Jeffrey Lewis @armscontrolwonk.bsky.social spoke to the Bulletin about what people should know about nuclear weapons—from basic terminology, to which nations have them, and what could occur when they're used.
What you should know about nuclear weapons
On October 29th, Donald Trump announced on his social media site, Truth Social, that he had instructed the Department of War (formerly the Department of Defense) to “start testing our Nuclear Weapons…
youtu.be
From the "Ice Age waltz" to the "fast greenhouse tango," Earth's ever-fluctuating climate "now follows our lead," write Benjamin Santer and David W.J. Thompson of @uniofeastanglia.bsky.social.

It's dangerous to normalize aberrations in the climate record, they continue, just as it is for politics.
The comforting but dangerous fantasy of ‘normal’ climatic and political aberrations
"We can’t let mature science be drowned out by the wacky argument that a snowball on the floor of the US Senate invalidates the existence of human-caused climate change."
thebulletin.org
Interview and video by Bulletin multimedia editor @erik-english.bsky.social.
What would happen if Chicago were the target of a nuclear bomb?

Jeffrey Lewis @armscontrolwonk.bsky.social spoke to the Bulletin about what people should know about nuclear weapons—from basic terminology, to which nations have them, and what could occur when they're used.
What you should know about nuclear weapons
On October 29th, Donald Trump announced on his social media site, Truth Social, that he had instructed the Department of War (formerly the Department of Defense) to “start testing our Nuclear Weapons…
youtu.be
Today, after more than a decade, global climate negotiations return to Latin America.

María de los Ángeles Orfila writes that COP30 "represents a political test for the region: Can Latin America this time speak with a more united and recognizable voice in global climate governance?"
Can Latin America find common ground at COP30?
Although Latin America contributes only about 10 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, many of its territories rank among the most climate-vulnerable on the planet.
thebulletin.org
A recently declassified document from nearly 50 years ago reinforces concerns about the proliferation potential of small modular reactors that require fuels using high-assay, low-enriched uranium, writes Edwin Lyman @nucsafetyucs.bsky.social of @ucs.org.
Declassified cable reinforces proliferation concerns about high-assay low-enriched uranium fuel
The declassified document reveals an urgent need for an international review of the proliferation risks of HALEU.
thebulletin.org
Bulletin nuclear affairs editor François Diaz-Maurin @francoisdm.bsky.social spoke to Mediapart @mediapart.fr about Donald Trump's announcement regarding a possible return to American nuclear weapons tests. ⬇️
Reposted by Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
@dexeve.bsky.social and I wrote this piece a while ago for
@bulletinatomic.bsky.social. In it, we propose interpreting the Russia-Belarusian nuclear sharing agreement along with Minsk's behavior surrounding it as a tool for the political survival of the Lukashenko regime. 1/?
When it comes to building a future with zero carbon emissions, "Real world solutions exist now and are easily scalable with the right investments and priorities. The obstacles aren't technological. They're political."

@michaelemann.bsky.social
You can’t reboot the planet if you crash it
What Gates is putting forward aren’t legitimate arguments that can be made in good faith. They are shopworn fossil fuel industry talking points.
thebulletin.org
This Bulletin magazine article is available to all readers for a limited time.
United States and Russian activity represents 17.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions, write members of the @ponarseurasia.bsky.social Task Force on Russia in a Changing Climate. Their self-interested approach to climate change will make it harder to raise adaptation funding for other nations.
The climate consequences of the US-Russia global realignment
Trump and Putin have both expressed support for better ties between the US and Russia. Despite obvious different interests in some areas, the two both want to promote the oil and gas sector—and will…
thebulletin.org
Reposted by Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The ending of A House of Dynamite leaves many questions unanswered, intentionally. In reality, we won’t have that luxury.

My colleague Isabelle Williams and I pick up where the movie ends, exploring what would unfold in the minutes, hours, and months after the missile hits Chicago.
Rebecka Green of @ploughshares.bsky.social watched over 20 films about nuclear weapons in one month, which taught her "several valuable lessons. For example, firing up Threads at 10:00 AM on a Tuesday morning can remind a person about the importance of a well-rounded, but not too heavy, breakfast."
Box office bombs: What I learned watching 20 nuclear films in a month
The quandaries posed by the nuclear film pantheon are the same ones experts in the nuclear threat reduction community face daily.
thebulletin.org
Reposted by Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
An excerpt from my new piece for @thebulletin.org on Bill Gates' new climate missive:
"Here's the thing, Bill Gates: There is no 'patch' for the climate crisis. And there is no way to reboot the planet if you crash it. The only safe and reliable way out when you find yourself in a climate hole is to stop digging—and burning—fossil fuels."
@michaelemann.bsky.social
You can’t reboot the planet if you crash it
What Gates is putting forward aren’t legitimate arguments that can be made in good faith. They are shopworn fossil fuel industry talking points.
thebulletin.org
⬆️ "In addition to unsettling decades of cooperation between the United States and its European allies, a geopolitical rapprochement between two of the world’s largest carbon emitters will have significant consequences for the global effort to stabilize the climate—both for better and for worse."
Authors include: Robert Orttung, Debra Javeline, Graeme Robertson, Richard Arnold, Andrew Barnes, Edward Holland, Mikhail Troitskiy, Judyth Twigg, and Susanne Wengle.