theangelofhistory.bsky.social
@theangelofhistory.bsky.social
But if you can lean on the OBR in a private system you can choose to make a different choice in a nationalised system
December 2, 2025 at 9:03 AM
The Greatest Benefit to Mankind
December 2, 2025 at 9:01 AM
The BBC shouldn’t report this unless it does a corresponding expose of Starmer’s anti semitism

Has he bullied his wife?

We demand to know
December 2, 2025 at 8:59 AM
And anyone who works in any large office building from Goldman Sachs to an arms company will have a lanyard

It’s like saying “employee”

They hate the “employee” class
December 1, 2025 at 11:43 PM
I’m sorry but have you been kicked in the head by a horse?

The error was an embarrassing but inconsequential - there was no material impact whatsoever

Something that was due to be public (& historically has been expressly leaked) was made public a few minutes early - this isn’t a “security” issue
December 1, 2025 at 11:19 PM
Congratulations on more non-sequiturs

This isn’t how anything works

Boards don’t resign over low level errors (this, by all accounts, was a fat finger error)

You’re error is to think because the OBR is in the public sector it needs to be treated as a ministry (which is a nonsense)
December 1, 2025 at 11:08 PM
The balls dropped into the Upside Down
December 1, 2025 at 10:20 PM
The reasons that’s an especially egregious example of stupid posting from Tech Lib Dem, is that things go wrong in the tech sector all the time but very rarely does the chair or CEO resign

AWS had a global outage this autumn - the CEO hasn’t resigned so far !
December 1, 2025 at 10:20 PM
If something akin to ministerial responsibility should apply to a function then it should be overseen by a minister who then takes responsibility

If we’ve chosen to operate something on an arms length basis then the entire point is to run it differently to a ministry !
December 1, 2025 at 10:17 PM
But that’s a bunch of non sequiturs from you

The “board” is ultimately responsible in a private entity too

You’re just confused as to what should happen, and why
December 1, 2025 at 10:16 PM
No, not at all

An executive agency should operate on the same rules as a private sector entity; the person who screws up loses their job
December 1, 2025 at 10:02 PM
A broken clock is correct twice a lifetime
December 1, 2025 at 8:17 PM
It’s almost as if people have misunderstood ministerial responsibility and then applied it wrongly to non-ministers
December 1, 2025 at 7:33 PM
The entire thing is really an intra-HMT optics management device that Osbourne created not a really fiscal auditor
December 1, 2025 at 7:06 PM
The best description of Trump, taking away the corruption & vulgarity, is “Pat Buchanan combined with Ross Perot”
December 1, 2025 at 6:30 PM
Every two years a city the size of Birmingham dies
December 1, 2025 at 3:54 PM
In afraid your wildly over estimating the UK’s capacities on this front

Also for a start even if the uk really want the most capable intelligence state, the UK’s intelligence capacity is inextricably linked to the US & the US is completely compromised

If I were the EU I wouldn’t trust the UK
December 1, 2025 at 3:53 PM
What’s an narco-Islamist?

Presumably the Hashishians?
December 1, 2025 at 3:04 PM
We definitely have bunching on income !

My point was that bunching or avoidance isn’t a reason to not tax, since it happens no matter what
December 1, 2025 at 3:02 PM
The adult in the room
December 1, 2025 at 2:31 PM
…house & either spend the money or invest it in something that’s not real estate

That’s all good
December 1, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Indeed - up to certain age cut offs - but that would mean they don’t in fact have any real estate wealth !

Whatever tax we introduce will lead to bunching at thresholds and a degree of gaming

So it’s not necessarily a bad thing if people borrow against their zero mortgage…
December 1, 2025 at 2:29 PM