@talkie-toaster.bsky.social
He’s actually a very impressive example of his species. Do you know any other orangutans that can walk on their hind legs and mimic human speech in the way Trump does? Didn’t think so.
September 29, 2025 at 1:38 AM
He’s actually a very impressive example of his species. Do you know any other orangutans that can walk on their hind legs and mimic human speech in the way Trump does? Didn’t think so.
The statement that Kirk “called for gay people to be stoned” is objectively false.
September 29, 2025 at 1:08 AM
The statement that Kirk “called for gay people to be stoned” is objectively false.
Please, do keep telling me what my position is. Your mind-reading powers are impressive!
As for why women don’t want TIMs in women-only spaces, I imagine it’s possibly because of the multiple cases of women being raped and assaulted by TIMs in women-only spaces.
Just a guess though!
As for why women don’t want TIMs in women-only spaces, I imagine it’s possibly because of the multiple cases of women being raped and assaulted by TIMs in women-only spaces.
Just a guess though!
August 15, 2025 at 1:23 AM
Please, do keep telling me what my position is. Your mind-reading powers are impressive!
As for why women don’t want TIMs in women-only spaces, I imagine it’s possibly because of the multiple cases of women being raped and assaulted by TIMs in women-only spaces.
Just a guess though!
As for why women don’t want TIMs in women-only spaces, I imagine it’s possibly because of the multiple cases of women being raped and assaulted by TIMs in women-only spaces.
Just a guess though!
Seems to be a whole lot of men who think they are women on lesbian dating apps, friend. Pretty sure they aren’t there for the blokes.
August 15, 2025 at 1:18 AM
Seems to be a whole lot of men who think they are women on lesbian dating apps, friend. Pretty sure they aren’t there for the blokes.
Friend, I am not horrified at your belief that bigotry is wrong. That’s my belief too. I’m horrified at your definition of bigotry.
Women saying “no” to men is bigotry?
Telling LGB kids they don’t need irreversible medicalisation, that they are perfect just as they are… is this bigotry?
Mmmmmkaay.
Women saying “no” to men is bigotry?
Telling LGB kids they don’t need irreversible medicalisation, that they are perfect just as they are… is this bigotry?
Mmmmmkaay.
August 15, 2025 at 1:14 AM
Friend, I am not horrified at your belief that bigotry is wrong. That’s my belief too. I’m horrified at your definition of bigotry.
Women saying “no” to men is bigotry?
Telling LGB kids they don’t need irreversible medicalisation, that they are perfect just as they are… is this bigotry?
Mmmmmkaay.
Women saying “no” to men is bigotry?
Telling LGB kids they don’t need irreversible medicalisation, that they are perfect just as they are… is this bigotry?
Mmmmmkaay.
Nothing wrong with male cheerleaders! Breaking boundaries, refusing to live by outdated norms!
August 15, 2025 at 1:03 AM
Nothing wrong with male cheerleaders! Breaking boundaries, refusing to live by outdated norms!
Please, do continue mansplaining to women what a woman is. It’s fascinating.
August 15, 2025 at 12:53 AM
Please, do continue mansplaining to women what a woman is. It’s fascinating.
So, quick clarification, are transwoman (who are, by definition, men) asserting the right to enter female-only spaces? Yes or no?
August 15, 2025 at 12:50 AM
So, quick clarification, are transwoman (who are, by definition, men) asserting the right to enter female-only spaces? Yes or no?
You’re not helping, friend. Please. Help me correct my wrongthink. That would be doubleplusgood!
August 15, 2025 at 12:32 AM
You’re not helping, friend. Please. Help me correct my wrongthink. That would be doubleplusgood!
I don’t think LGB kids are broken, and I don’t think they need to be fixed with experimental and irreversible medical interventions.
I don’t agree with a marginalised group being redefined without their consent.
Please, can you help? I’m trying to identify my own bigotry and I’m struggling.
I don’t agree with a marginalised group being redefined without their consent.
Please, can you help? I’m trying to identify my own bigotry and I’m struggling.
August 15, 2025 at 12:25 AM
I don’t think LGB kids are broken, and I don’t think they need to be fixed with experimental and irreversible medical interventions.
I don’t agree with a marginalised group being redefined without their consent.
Please, can you help? I’m trying to identify my own bigotry and I’m struggling.
I don’t agree with a marginalised group being redefined without their consent.
Please, can you help? I’m trying to identify my own bigotry and I’m struggling.
Wonderful to see the diversity of responses to this extremely generous, dignified and moral response.
Everyone is showing the world who they are.
Everyone is showing the world who they are.
August 14, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Wonderful to see the diversity of responses to this extremely generous, dignified and moral response.
Everyone is showing the world who they are.
Everyone is showing the world who they are.
Scroll down that thread and the situation looks less rosy. They’ve changed the definition of female. x.com/babybeginner...
Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙♀️🦉🐈⬛ 🦖 on X: "@WingsScotland Sigh. No. They did something worse. They changed the definition of female. They transed all species!!! How do you tell a female cat from a male cat? I guess we have to check its identity now. https://t.co/SsC8FYMrXt" / X
@WingsScotland Sigh. No. They did something worse. They changed the definition of female. They transed all species!!! How do you tell a female cat from a male cat? I guess we have to check its identity now. https://t.co/SsC8FYMrXt
x.com
August 13, 2025 at 1:51 AM
Scroll down that thread and the situation looks less rosy. They’ve changed the definition of female. x.com/babybeginner...
I try to do my own thinking because practice makes perfect.
Outsourcing your cognition to a AI is like a pro soccer player sending a robot to all of their training sessions and then wondering why they aren’t scoring any goals.
Time for a new religion based on rejection of AI and respect for HI.
Outsourcing your cognition to a AI is like a pro soccer player sending a robot to all of their training sessions and then wondering why they aren’t scoring any goals.
Time for a new religion based on rejection of AI and respect for HI.
July 10, 2025 at 12:56 AM
I try to do my own thinking because practice makes perfect.
Outsourcing your cognition to a AI is like a pro soccer player sending a robot to all of their training sessions and then wondering why they aren’t scoring any goals.
Time for a new religion based on rejection of AI and respect for HI.
Outsourcing your cognition to a AI is like a pro soccer player sending a robot to all of their training sessions and then wondering why they aren’t scoring any goals.
Time for a new religion based on rejection of AI and respect for HI.
So… is anyone going to address the point? It’s not a good idea to do permanent things to children on the basis of junk-tier science. This is a massive failure of medical and scientific ethics. Stomping women’s rights and transing the gay away isn’t progressive no matter how many times you say it is.
July 9, 2025 at 4:58 AM
So… is anyone going to address the point? It’s not a good idea to do permanent things to children on the basis of junk-tier science. This is a massive failure of medical and scientific ethics. Stomping women’s rights and transing the gay away isn’t progressive no matter how many times you say it is.
The life path and relationships of men are not as clearly defined as they were historically. Men are talking about that, with varying degrees of skill and coming from a range of perspectives.
So what? Of course this discussion will happen. Why take the whole discussion and label it a cult?
So what? Of course this discussion will happen. Why take the whole discussion and label it a cult?
May 5, 2025 at 12:05 AM
The life path and relationships of men are not as clearly defined as they were historically. Men are talking about that, with varying degrees of skill and coming from a range of perspectives.
So what? Of course this discussion will happen. Why take the whole discussion and label it a cult?
So what? Of course this discussion will happen. Why take the whole discussion and label it a cult?
You’re so close to getting it:
Men redefining women to the detriment of women and without the consent of women isn’t right.
It’s not right.
You do need to walk away from it.
Men redefining women to the detriment of women and without the consent of women isn’t right.
It’s not right.
You do need to walk away from it.
March 22, 2025 at 6:58 PM
You’re so close to getting it:
Men redefining women to the detriment of women and without the consent of women isn’t right.
It’s not right.
You do need to walk away from it.
Men redefining women to the detriment of women and without the consent of women isn’t right.
It’s not right.
You do need to walk away from it.
and I must go, but even if we disagree, perhaps you can accept that I’m saying what I’m saying because I have real concerns about the rights of women and the rights, minds and bodies of LGB youth? Because I really, really do.
March 22, 2025 at 2:35 AM
and I must go, but even if we disagree, perhaps you can accept that I’m saying what I’m saying because I have real concerns about the rights of women and the rights, minds and bodies of LGB youth? Because I really, really do.
Me, me, me. When men are punching women in the face at the olympics and getting a gold medal for it, and gay kids are effectively going through a harmful new form of conversion therapy, you may wish to consider the effects of this lie on people who aren’t you. This is so homophobic! Can’t you see?
March 22, 2025 at 2:33 AM
Me, me, me. When men are punching women in the face at the olympics and getting a gold medal for it, and gay kids are effectively going through a harmful new form of conversion therapy, you may wish to consider the effects of this lie on people who aren’t you. This is so homophobic! Can’t you see?
People lie to themselves. A person who does not, cannot have the life experience of growing up as a girl & woman has no business telling you (or any other woman) what a woman is. That word is yours, not mine. Men don’t have the right to redefine it. Women do have the right to say no when they try.
March 22, 2025 at 2:22 AM
People lie to themselves. A person who does not, cannot have the life experience of growing up as a girl & woman has no business telling you (or any other woman) what a woman is. That word is yours, not mine. Men don’t have the right to redefine it. Women do have the right to say no when they try.
Well, when a man says he’s a woman and a woman says he’s not, who do you believe, who’s opinion is given more weight, and why?
Have a think about that, and while you’re at it, stop thinking of me as the enemy.
Have a think about that, and while you’re at it, stop thinking of me as the enemy.
March 22, 2025 at 2:08 AM
Well, when a man says he’s a woman and a woman says he’s not, who do you believe, who’s opinion is given more weight, and why?
Have a think about that, and while you’re at it, stop thinking of me as the enemy.
Have a think about that, and while you’re at it, stop thinking of me as the enemy.
I’ll try again.
When a man says he’s a woman and a woman says he’s not, you automatically and instinctively believe the man. Even though the woman is kind of the expert here.
This pattern of excessive respect for male opinions makes you both a victim of the patriarchy, and a misogynist.
When a man says he’s a woman and a woman says he’s not, you automatically and instinctively believe the man. Even though the woman is kind of the expert here.
This pattern of excessive respect for male opinions makes you both a victim of the patriarchy, and a misogynist.
March 22, 2025 at 2:03 AM
I’ll try again.
When a man says he’s a woman and a woman says he’s not, you automatically and instinctively believe the man. Even though the woman is kind of the expert here.
This pattern of excessive respect for male opinions makes you both a victim of the patriarchy, and a misogynist.
When a man says he’s a woman and a woman says he’s not, you automatically and instinctively believe the man. Even though the woman is kind of the expert here.
This pattern of excessive respect for male opinions makes you both a victim of the patriarchy, and a misogynist.
Hey look! It’s a misogynist who automatically believes a man when he says he’s a woman and automatically disbelieves a women when she says he’s not.
Please, do continue redefining a marginalised group without the consent of that group. Its sooooo progressive.
Please, do continue redefining a marginalised group without the consent of that group. Its sooooo progressive.
March 22, 2025 at 1:56 AM
Hey look! It’s a misogynist who automatically believes a man when he says he’s a woman and automatically disbelieves a women when she says he’s not.
Please, do continue redefining a marginalised group without the consent of that group. Its sooooo progressive.
Please, do continue redefining a marginalised group without the consent of that group. Its sooooo progressive.
I agree. It is not hateful to express concerns about irreversible physical treatments being given to children to treat psychological conditions on the basis of flawed junk science.
I lose respect for people who don’t have any questions. It’s like “really? no questions? nothing to see here?”
I lose respect for people who don’t have any questions. It’s like “really? no questions? nothing to see here?”
March 22, 2025 at 1:38 AM
I agree. It is not hateful to express concerns about irreversible physical treatments being given to children to treat psychological conditions on the basis of flawed junk science.
I lose respect for people who don’t have any questions. It’s like “really? no questions? nothing to see here?”
I lose respect for people who don’t have any questions. It’s like “really? no questions? nothing to see here?”