Tom Inglesby
banner
t-inglesby.bsky.social
Tom Inglesby
@t-inglesby.bsky.social
Director @bsph-chs.bsky.social
Epidemics, public health, biosecurity, policy, and preparedness.
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-inglesby-93b51582/
If she’s given license to make decisions on vax and other pub health issues, provided budget to preserve CDC's public health programs, allowed to retain human capital, operations, scientific workforce CDC needs, I’ve no doubt she’ll be a very effective CDC leader during challenging time. /end
March 25, 2025 at 7:25 PM
Has had roles at White House OSTP, National Sec Council, HSARPA, HRSA, most recently establishing the new ARPA-H as first Dep Director. She is good and fair to people, wants to make people's lives better. She is epitome of a senior public servant who doesn't do politics but gets things done. 2/x
March 25, 2025 at 7:25 PM
In a fast moving epidemic, rapid tests are tools that can help people get the right treatment more quickly and help families stay healthier.
February 18, 2025 at 11:16 PM
Destroying $500M worth of covid tests in the national stockpile would be a terrible waste of resources. They are an insurance policy against a resurgent new variant - of course we all hope that kind of variant doesn't occur, but why destroy tests that would be invaluable in that scenario. 1/x
February 18, 2025 at 11:16 PM
Governance of high consequence risks is not only important for countries w/ leading edge biotech, its also big issue for low+middle income countries without these technologies. Because if things goes very wrong and epidemics/pandemics result, LMICs will disproportionately shoulder the impact. /end
February 18, 2025 at 11:04 PM
For countries doing work in these fields, this kind of governance should become a commitment to responsibility and an expectation. 9/x
February 18, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Few countries yet have rules that govern some of the greatest risks in biological science, e.g. governing the creation of novel strains of pathogens that could lead to pandemics, governing AIxbio pandemic risks, requiring genome synthesis screening. 8/x
February 18, 2025 at 11:04 PM
We should do what we can to strengthen the norm against bioweapons development of use – BWC very important. WHO also key in providing recommendations and tech guidance to member states on how to prevent and prepare for biological events, whether they are deliberate or related to lab accidents. 7/x
February 18, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Political leaders at Paris AI Summit were eager to drive frontier model AI forward asap, and did not much focus on biosecurity or biosafety – so the scientific and technical community working on these issues will need to develop potential solutions and then make the case back to policy leaders. 6/x
February 18, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Convergence of AI and life sciences will bring great breakthroughs and scientific and medical transformations, and we can’t slow those down. But we do also have to protect against the greatest risks – esp. pandemic risks – that this convergence could spark
5/x
February 18, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Policy officials aren’t very interested in talking about pandemics right now – many have moved on. But a new pandemic could occur without warning. It’s the job of tech community to keep making the case for preparedness to policy leaders. 4/x
February 18, 2025 at 11:04 PM
H5N1 bird flu is very serious risk & influenza should be at top of pandemic concerns. But other viral families could spark pandemic too, as coronavirus family did w/ COVID. We need to be preparing med countermeasures, esp vaccine prototypes, across viral families posing greatest pandemic risks. 3/x
February 18, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Great to be in dialogue w/ Mayesha Alam, @jaimeyassif.bsky.social and Andrew Hebbeler biosecurity challenges and potential solutions. A lot of constructive ground covered. Few of the points I worked to make in that session: 2/x
February 18, 2025 at 11:04 PM
This kind of indiscriminate firing of HHS employees is detrimental to the country and to the health of Americans and should stop and be reversed. /end
February 17, 2025 at 5:47 PM
There will be less young talented people going into life sciences research in the country which help our peer competitor countries do better in science and technology over us, and so many more primary, secondary, tertiary negative consequences. 5/x
February 17, 2025 at 5:47 PM
What this translates to in the long run is less new medicines to treat sick Americans, less committed people going into government so key government health services will degrade. 4/x
February 17, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Will likely also result in the loss of major research projects in government and the country's research community, loss of nurses caring for patients at the NIH Clinical Center. 3/x
February 17, 2025 at 5:47 PM
These could include the scientific officials handling new medicine approval, those in charge preparedness for major emergencies and outbreaks, and the loss of best new talent who had decided to come into government. 2/x
February 17, 2025 at 5:47 PM
EIS officers help to keep the public healthy and safer from diseases like bird flu. It would be the equivalent of firing the firefighters or the police officers in the nation's most respected training programs. This action should be reversed. / end
February 17, 2025 at 5:42 PM
EIS officers are on front lines all around the country to stop epidemics from taking off and responding to them emergently when they happen. In cities and states, helping to strengthen responders. 2/x
February 17, 2025 at 5:42 PM