@sumnemo.bsky.social
You are doing what they do when they can’t make a coherent response against a well reasoned position but just saying MAGA instead of libtard
November 5, 2025 at 2:51 PM
You are doing what they do when they can’t make a coherent response against a well reasoned position but just saying MAGA instead of libtard
What hypocrisy, also as someone who is probably concerned about Trumps cuts and wasteful spending, do you know how much animal agriculture is subsidised in the US?
November 5, 2025 at 2:29 PM
What hypocrisy, also as someone who is probably concerned about Trumps cuts and wasteful spending, do you know how much animal agriculture is subsidised in the US?
No you don’t, you are arbitrarily applying a different set of ethical standards to a different species, that have similar essential interests they don’t want violated. Veganism is about being consistent with valuing justice and opposing discrimination.
November 5, 2025 at 2:20 PM
No you don’t, you are arbitrarily applying a different set of ethical standards to a different species, that have similar essential interests they don’t want violated. Veganism is about being consistent with valuing justice and opposing discrimination.
If you are against all these other forms of discrimination, it entails that veganism should also be moral value of yours
November 5, 2025 at 2:07 PM
If you are against all these other forms of discrimination, it entails that veganism should also be moral value of yours
Yes Nazis were famous for being against discrimination, obviously
November 5, 2025 at 2:03 PM
Yes Nazis were famous for being against discrimination, obviously
If you oppose discrimination and value justice you ought be vegan by your own standard. Animals have similar essential interests that it would be unethical to violate in the human context. Therefore without a consistent justifier for distinction in treatment you are engaging in discrimination.
May 20, 2025 at 11:36 AM
If you oppose discrimination and value justice you ought be vegan by your own standard. Animals have similar essential interests that it would be unethical to violate in the human context. Therefore without a consistent justifier for distinction in treatment you are engaging in discrimination.
Meat alternatives are still less impactful than most meat. www.sustainabilitybynumbers.com/p/carbon-foo...
May 9, 2025 at 9:21 AM
Meat alternatives are still less impactful than most meat. www.sustainabilitybynumbers.com/p/carbon-foo...
It’s more ethically consistent if you value justice and oppose discrimination
April 20, 2025 at 3:52 PM
It’s more ethically consistent if you value justice and oppose discrimination
for other animals
April 16, 2025 at 3:39 PM
for other animals
You have made the accusation of moralising nature but if we are part of nature having concern for other human suffering should be the same as for wild animal suffering. You have made the accusation I’m saying we ought to interfere in nature but my point is we ought have at least concern
April 16, 2025 at 3:35 PM
You have made the accusation of moralising nature but if we are part of nature having concern for other human suffering should be the same as for wild animal suffering. You have made the accusation I’m saying we ought to interfere in nature but my point is we ought have at least concern
I have a framework for what I mean when I use the term ethical. You’re doing a lot of accusations without clarifications and have been bordering contradictory repeating buzzwords doesn’t make you clearer
April 16, 2025 at 3:22 PM
I have a framework for what I mean when I use the term ethical. You’re doing a lot of accusations without clarifications and have been bordering contradictory repeating buzzwords doesn’t make you clearer
I’m just concerned when cultural practices have victims. Having concern with wild animal suffering isn’t about controlling nature it’s about extending care. If we are happy to help a child get medicine for a natural disease should that been seen as interfering with nature?
April 16, 2025 at 1:06 PM
I’m just concerned when cultural practices have victims. Having concern with wild animal suffering isn’t about controlling nature it’s about extending care. If we are happy to help a child get medicine for a natural disease should that been seen as interfering with nature?
The only vegans I can think who you might mean are ones also concerned with wild animal suffering, do you think this is not an issue? I’m not sure many who have an issue with moral issue with entropy
April 16, 2025 at 12:46 PM
The only vegans I can think who you might mean are ones also concerned with wild animal suffering, do you think this is not an issue? I’m not sure many who have an issue with moral issue with entropy
The ethical issue is the exploitation and discrimination and being killed
April 16, 2025 at 12:38 PM
The ethical issue is the exploitation and discrimination and being killed
It’s also increasingly impractical as more people are living in urban environments whereas plant based agricultural technologies such as vertical farming and hydroponics are far more integrable with these environments.
April 16, 2025 at 12:37 PM
It’s also increasingly impractical as more people are living in urban environments whereas plant based agricultural technologies such as vertical farming and hydroponics are far more integrable with these environments.
The environmental impact of animal ag isn’t just the fact it is concentrated animal products are inherently far more impactful and small farms would add to travel impact. ourworldindata.org/food-choice-...
April 16, 2025 at 12:33 PM
The environmental impact of animal ag isn’t just the fact it is concentrated animal products are inherently far more impactful and small farms would add to travel impact. ourworldindata.org/food-choice-...
How does it moralise natures cycle?
April 16, 2025 at 12:25 PM
How does it moralise natures cycle?
Everyone puts themselves above nature, you’re not living in the wild you use modern technology. Many vegans realise the environmental benefit of veganism and are vegan precisely because they view our domination of animals as wrong. What do you mean by reciprocity in a vegan context?
April 16, 2025 at 12:15 PM
Everyone puts themselves above nature, you’re not living in the wild you use modern technology. Many vegans realise the environmental benefit of veganism and are vegan precisely because they view our domination of animals as wrong. What do you mean by reciprocity in a vegan context?
It wouldn’t even necessarily need to be a tax it could be done by ending the massive subsidies animal ag gets although both together could be good
April 16, 2025 at 12:01 PM
It wouldn’t even necessarily need to be a tax it could be done by ending the massive subsidies animal ag gets although both together could be good
in any other aspect of your life?
April 16, 2025 at 11:58 AM
in any other aspect of your life?
Abstaining from nature isn’t the ethic of veganism, it is about being consistent with valuing justice and opposing discrimination by extending our consideration to other animals. Are you implying Afro-veganism views some exploitation and killing is ok. Do you apply your logic of being part of nature
April 16, 2025 at 11:57 AM
Abstaining from nature isn’t the ethic of veganism, it is about being consistent with valuing justice and opposing discrimination by extending our consideration to other animals. Are you implying Afro-veganism views some exploitation and killing is ok. Do you apply your logic of being part of nature
Animal products inherently have far higher environmental impact. A well planned WFPB diet is very healthy and reduces risk of certain conditions. Also if you value justice and oppose discrimination as an anti-capitalist you should consider the exploitation of animals as unethical as well
April 15, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Animal products inherently have far higher environmental impact. A well planned WFPB diet is very healthy and reduces risk of certain conditions. Also if you value justice and oppose discrimination as an anti-capitalist you should consider the exploitation of animals as unethical as well
April 12, 2025 at 2:57 AM
Humans and non-human animals have similar essential interests,(ie wanting to live free from harm ) and if we oppose discrimination we ought consider a violation of these interests unethical for both. Plants aren’t sentient and don’t have interests to violate.
April 12, 2025 at 2:50 AM
Humans and non-human animals have similar essential interests,(ie wanting to live free from harm ) and if we oppose discrimination we ought consider a violation of these interests unethical for both. Plants aren’t sentient and don’t have interests to violate.