They are the same.

on October 23, 2025, at 11:59 PM

@lianeleeyoung.bsky.social @stysyropoulos.bsky.social @amormino.bsky.social @drcharlie.bsky.social @realmoralitylab.bsky.social

Thanks Mark. My colleagues and I emailed the editor expressing this as well.

And perhaps the icing on the cake, blatantly failing to even acknowledge that future thinking and the study of future generations is a real topic, disregarding hundreds of papers on this issue across fields:

" "Concern about Future People" Is Not Real" "

Here is another one, where this R criticizes another paper of mine in PSPB: "Perhaps the reviewers of the paper appearing in PSPB (and the editor that accepted it for publication) were not at all curious about construct validity. Those reviewers, however, are elsewhere.

Another gem: "We may as well discuss how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, or how elves, leprechauns, and pixies should be treated if we assume that they exist. If there are ANY real world implications of ANY of this, the authors are obligated to provide these."

osf.io/preprints/ps...