Stephen Senn
banner
stephensenn.bsky.social
Stephen Senn
@stephensenn.bsky.social
1.6K followers 190 following 720 posts
Swiss & British statistician.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
You may think that 10,000 social scientists can’t be wrong but have you considered split-plot analyses?
“You will find that many repeated measures analyses deserve to be placed in the spit-pot.” Sayings of Confuseus
You categorised patients as responders or non responders by dichotomising a change from baseline?
You triple criminal!
Fraudulent research should be withdrawn.
Today’s walk was from Silverburn to Flotterstone via the Silverburn Quarry, The Kirk Rd, Carnethy, Turnhouse & “The Biscuit Tin” to a pint of Pentland IPA at the Flotterstone Inn
Especially as a younger author I had many letters to the editors published pointing out errors in statistics. The original papers were never withdrawn and I never expected that they should be. My letter would nearly always be accompanied by an author’s reply. That’s what I think should happen.
Some mistake surely. Any Frenchman can tell you “la philosophie ovale” is rugby.
Just finished reading this novel by my brother-in-law and am impressed. Software development and maintenance as a relentless treadmill to which the programmers and coders are chained.
A nice touch is that imagines a Britain in which Thanet is still an island.
Human Software is now available via Waterstones, Barnes and Noble, Amazon and many others including Kobo, Leanpub.

For all the ways to buy in paperback and e-book:

humansoftwarebook.com/how-to-purch...

#booksky #writingcommunity #selfpublished
Having worked in both academia and pharma, I have the following point of view. “You should treat all RCT based claims with caution, especially those coming from academia.”
Today we had a family lunch at The Boat in Catherine-de-Barnes followed by a walk along the canal. #Warwickshire
I don’t necessarily disagree but you can make the inclusion criteria as wide as you like but it is no guarantee that you will get a wide selection of patients. If you do want to use covariates to define applicability, it’s the values of patients you did include not those you might have that matter.
The target population for the research question is the population of people who would satisfy the eligibility criteria. “
Wrong x 2
1) The eligibility criteria define who doesn’t come into the trial not who does.
2) We generalise from quite different trials to populations eg bioequivalence trials.
Brave of you to go West. I remember when I used to live in Fife, people would speak in hushed voices trying to hide their dread when they had to go West.
It reminds me of the two sorts of manager. Those who run a tight ship and the other sort.
Heaven forfend that they should do anything that went against the grain.
And of the agriculturalists who like a hoedown you say nothing.
Let’s hear it for flawed paradox.