Until All of Us Are Free
@solidarity5ever.bsky.social
Btchy hedonistic feminist trying my best to fight for liberation for all. 🏴🏳️🌈 Fun (and not-so-fun) facts, art, absurdism, amateur philosophy (derogatory).
I also think it's easy to imagine a trillion. There. Just did it. Actually I just imagined 5 trillion. I'm really good at imagining stuff. Now I'm imagining exactly what should be done to this cannibal.
December 4, 2025 at 12:36 AM
I also think it's easy to imagine a trillion. There. Just did it. Actually I just imagined 5 trillion. I'm really good at imagining stuff. Now I'm imagining exactly what should be done to this cannibal.
November 28, 2025 at 2:11 PM
You called trans people fixated. I said that's like saying gay people are fixated on having sex with the same sex. And you said that's the definition of homosexuality.
November 26, 2025 at 12:45 AM
You called trans people fixated. I said that's like saying gay people are fixated on having sex with the same sex. And you said that's the definition of homosexuality.
Most gay people aren't obsessed with having sex with someone their same gender (try so hard to not get triggered that I said gender). So no, that's NOT the definition of homosexual. You're now pathologizing being gay.
November 25, 2025 at 11:35 PM
Most gay people aren't obsessed with having sex with someone their same gender (try so hard to not get triggered that I said gender). So no, that's NOT the definition of homosexual. You're now pathologizing being gay.
Now THAT was an insult. And once again you're wrong. If I was inaccurately reporting the meaning of what you've said, then sure. But I haven't done that because if I had you'd easily tell me what I was wrong about and how.
November 21, 2025 at 8:33 PM
Now THAT was an insult. And once again you're wrong. If I was inaccurately reporting the meaning of what you've said, then sure. But I haven't done that because if I had you'd easily tell me what I was wrong about and how.
What atrocities did Cersi commit against innocent civilians? Oh only starting a war across the entire continent by having her husband killed and blowing up the "Vatican".
November 21, 2025 at 4:42 PM
What atrocities did Cersi commit against innocent civilians? Oh only starting a war across the entire continent by having her husband killed and blowing up the "Vatican".
This is the perfect encapsulation of Blue MAGA.
1. Putting president in quotes as if Trump isn't the real president.
2. The fatphobia. Trump's physical body is more shameful than the rape, bigotry, and fraud here.
3. The hyper focus on the aesthetics of membership in the American elite.
1. Putting president in quotes as if Trump isn't the real president.
2. The fatphobia. Trump's physical body is more shameful than the rape, bigotry, and fraud here.
3. The hyper focus on the aesthetics of membership in the American elite.
November 21, 2025 at 3:49 PM
This is the perfect encapsulation of Blue MAGA.
1. Putting president in quotes as if Trump isn't the real president.
2. The fatphobia. Trump's physical body is more shameful than the rape, bigotry, and fraud here.
3. The hyper focus on the aesthetics of membership in the American elite.
1. Putting president in quotes as if Trump isn't the real president.
2. The fatphobia. Trump's physical body is more shameful than the rape, bigotry, and fraud here.
3. The hyper focus on the aesthetics of membership in the American elite.
Hahaha oh honey. IQ is bullshit too. But I have a perfectly reasonable explanation of why there's a sharp increase, albeit still a very small number of the population, in the number of children identifying as trans.
November 20, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Hahaha oh honey. IQ is bullshit too. But I have a perfectly reasonable explanation of why there's a sharp increase, albeit still a very small number of the population, in the number of children identifying as trans.
The anti-trans argument has evolved to claiming that sex characteristics are irrelevant to determining the sex of an individual AND that sex is defined by the characteristics an individual possesses that align with male or female gamete production. But they think "organized" isn't characteristics.
November 18, 2025 at 1:02 PM
The anti-trans argument has evolved to claiming that sex characteristics are irrelevant to determining the sex of an individual AND that sex is defined by the characteristics an individual possesses that align with male or female gamete production. But they think "organized" isn't characteristics.
"generally" means usually
November 18, 2025 at 3:55 AM
"generally" means usually
November 18, 2025 at 3:28 AM
Apparently you just say shit and don't know what you're talking about.
www.britannica.com/science/anth...
www.britannica.com/science/anth...
November 18, 2025 at 3:14 AM
Apparently you just say shit and don't know what you're talking about.
www.britannica.com/science/anth...
www.britannica.com/science/anth...
Nope. It's an opinion piece from a relevant expert. What do you think anthropology is?
November 18, 2025 at 3:13 AM
Nope. It's an opinion piece from a relevant expert. What do you think anthropology is?
They didn't say the literature disagrees with them. They said the textbooks are out of date with the actual science. And they said sex is a continuum.
November 17, 2025 at 11:44 PM
They didn't say the literature disagrees with them. They said the textbooks are out of date with the actual science. And they said sex is a continuum.
That wasn't an insult. It was a statement of fact. You said that regardless of scientific evidence you'd be opposed to trans women competing in women's sports events. That can only mean you want trans women to never be socially recognized as women under any circumstances.
November 15, 2025 at 7:54 PM
That wasn't an insult. It was a statement of fact. You said that regardless of scientific evidence you'd be opposed to trans women competing in women's sports events. That can only mean you want trans women to never be socially recognized as women under any circumstances.
You still missed the point. You want to reinforce the social construct of gender essentialism no matter the actual evidence.
November 15, 2025 at 2:39 PM
You still missed the point. You want to reinforce the social construct of gender essentialism no matter the actual evidence.
Yes it is. Do you believe that we should socially accept trans people as their stated gender? It's a yes or no question.
November 14, 2025 at 8:54 PM
Yes it is. Do you believe that we should socially accept trans people as their stated gender? It's a yes or no question.
The city itself has 900,000 residents. The metropolitan area (that's where the burbs are) is 2.2 million residents. You said Columbus only has 15,000 residents and the 900,000 live in the burbs. That's just false. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbu...
November 13, 2025 at 8:46 PM
The city itself has 900,000 residents. The metropolitan area (that's where the burbs are) is 2.2 million residents. You said Columbus only has 15,000 residents and the 900,000 live in the burbs. That's just false. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbu...
This mfer just demanded a citation for "people live in cities".
November 13, 2025 at 8:35 PM
This mfer just demanded a citation for "people live in cities".
You haven't done that and in fact you've been proven wrong. And you've admitted that you don't care about the evidence anyway. You want trans women excluded from full participation in society regardless of any evidence. That means you're using exclusively motivated reasoning.
November 13, 2025 at 12:27 AM
You haven't done that and in fact you've been proven wrong. And you've admitted that you don't care about the evidence anyway. You want trans women excluded from full participation in society regardless of any evidence. That means you're using exclusively motivated reasoning.
Allowing trans women to compete in women's sports doesn't destroy fair competition. That's what the evidence shows very clearly. In fact that's what we've shown Charles here, who eventually admits it's not about fairness to him at all. Just excluding trans women.
November 12, 2025 at 9:58 PM
Allowing trans women to compete in women's sports doesn't destroy fair competition. That's what the evidence shows very clearly. In fact that's what we've shown Charles here, who eventually admits it's not about fairness to him at all. Just excluding trans women.
Why are you still pretending that you care about fairness? You don't. You only care about enforcing the bounds of acceptable womanhood.
November 12, 2025 at 7:36 PM
Why are you still pretending that you care about fairness? You don't. You only care about enforcing the bounds of acceptable womanhood.