Again....
Again....
Like I said elsewhere, it's a statement made for a particular outcome of interaction.
In this case, it was a 'net'. And you fell full face into it. 😂 Which it's probably good you wear a helmet. 🤣
Like I said elsewhere, it's a statement made for a particular outcome of interaction.
In this case, it was a 'net'. And you fell full face into it. 😂 Which it's probably good you wear a helmet. 🤣
2. You're the only one making all the assumptions so far. 😂
3. This is classic trolling. What a great sport you've been. 😂
2. You're the only one making all the assumptions so far. 😂
3. This is classic trolling. What a great sport you've been. 😂
I stated "STARS?" & was given "EXPOSURE". Simple as that.
Also, it isn't 'had knew', it's 'would have known'.
And to point out, I didn't know, that's why I asked.
I stated "STARS?" & was given "EXPOSURE". Simple as that.
Also, it isn't 'had knew', it's 'would have known'.
And to point out, I didn't know, that's why I asked.
Oh lawdy. tsk. tsk. and Bless Your Heart.
'Cultists' seek power-related advantage & find it crucial for others to adhere & agree to, their belief system and/or ideas, & have no tolerance for questions or critical inquiry....
sounds a lot like you Kosmic.
Oh lawdy. tsk. tsk. and Bless Your Heart.
'Cultists' seek power-related advantage & find it crucial for others to adhere & agree to, their belief system and/or ideas, & have no tolerance for questions or critical inquiry....
sounds a lot like you Kosmic.
You are exhibiting a dire need to be validated and prove your authority in a situation that doesn't require it, and in which it literally would make no difference.
You are exhibiting a dire need to be validated and prove your authority in a situation that doesn't require it, and in which it literally would make no difference.
Which would imply that I understood the term & it's qualities as it would apply to my question.
I also understand that it's crucially imperative to you, to believe that I'm stupid. Insecure much?
Which would imply that I understood the term & it's qualities as it would apply to my question.
I also understand that it's crucially imperative to you, to believe that I'm stupid. Insecure much?
Save yourself. You're a bore.
Save yourself. You're a bore.
I'm just quoting .gov articles in their descr. of the crafts;
& you're so astute, I live in a 29.5' RV, AND hold a license in Clinical Counseling. LOL
Btw, .5' actually equals 6 inches. Quit lying to ur girlfriend.
I'm just quoting .gov articles in their descr. of the crafts;
& you're so astute, I live in a 29.5' RV, AND hold a license in Clinical Counseling. LOL
Btw, .5' actually equals 6 inches. Quit lying to ur girlfriend.
Simple math can give it a unit, but for the most part it is not the scientific formula most commonly used for measurements of speed or time for movement of the planets.
Don't agree? Argue it with NASA.
Simple math can give it a unit, but for the most part it is not the scientific formula most commonly used for measurements of speed or time for movement of the planets.
Don't agree? Argue it with NASA.
You're quantifying with a redundant semantic argument.
You could also measure mi/h in metres/second, milliseconds, or how many hamsters/odometer it would take to equal said [speed].
You're quantifying with a redundant semantic argument.
You could also measure mi/h in metres/second, milliseconds, or how many hamsters/odometer it would take to equal said [speed].
And multiple dozens of them? Don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize it's our own military false-flagging us.
Bet if something NOT OURS started flying over power installations you'd see some NORAD shit then. lol
And multiple dozens of them? Don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize it's our own military false-flagging us.
Bet if something NOT OURS started flying over power installations you'd see some NORAD shit then. lol
Try being a stream, not a spout.
Try being a stream, not a spout.
Anyone can just 'absorb' information - how dull.
Anyone can just 'absorb' information - how dull.