Redeploy the initial PIP decision makers as they are habitually overruled on appeal . After making that saving for the taxpayer I look forward to hearing at PMQs where the 250,000 disability confident jobs are that enable these cuts . Defence ? Construction ?

Who would have thought .

Not been well since February and to keep going I treat myself to the odd inspirational item for the home office . Having recently read the attached here on BlueSky I have purchased a small plastic lobster and introduced him/her/it to my men’s health group yesterday 👍

An effective system would be good . Starter for ten let’s redeploy the people on first PIP decision stage as they are habitually overruled at taxpayer expense anyway .

There is a safety net . It’s £96k per year with a performance review of a job with no job description every 5 years .

This is such a good analogy I think I shall purchase a small lobster model for our next mens health group meeting .

A petition debate is a good starter for ten if you can get 100k signatures . The debate doesn’t change the law but it’s a good way of seeing if an idea has legs .

MPs don’t have job descriptions or performance standards or attendance requirements . It seems bizarre to me we pay £96k for people to represent us but don’t run it like any other business . It seems to be the ultimate blank cheque for 5 years .

Why would you want to come here when the previous administration did so much to project soft power abroad .

Scare the pants off the vulnerable in March 2025 before we find out if the required disability confident jobs to cut PIP are available in October 2025 is not joined up mission based government www.theguardian.com/world/2025/m...

This still sums it up for me from the previous Conservative administration . We only want you when you’re useful .