Semanticlemur
semanticlemur.bsky.social
Semanticlemur
@semanticlemur.bsky.social
Adult human female
Reposted by Semanticlemur
'Sadly, a significant contribution to the prevention of sensible, two-way discussion of this sensitive issue was Stonewall’s 2015 decision to adopt an approach of “no debate” – online, on public platforms and in the broadcast media.'
💯🎯💯
www.theguardian.com/society/2025...
Stonewall’s policy of ‘no debate’ on trans rights was a mistake | Letters
Letters: The LGBTQ+ rights charity’s former head Ben Summerskill and the parent of a trans-identifying young person respond to coverage of the recent supreme court ruling
www.theguardian.com
April 30, 2025 at 8:38 PM
Reposted by Semanticlemur
What a good pair of letters in the Guardian on the trans issue. Together they thoroughly address the carnage that has been created by activists.
'Sadly, a significant contribution to the prevention of sensible, two-way discussion of this sensitive issue was Stonewall’s 2015 decision to adopt an approach of “no debate” – online, on public platforms and in the broadcast media.'
💯🎯💯
www.theguardian.com/society/2025...
Stonewall’s policy of ‘no debate’ on trans rights was a mistake | Letters
Letters: The LGBTQ+ rights charity’s former head Ben Summerskill and the parent of a trans-identifying young person respond to coverage of the recent supreme court ruling
www.theguardian.com
May 1, 2025 at 12:19 AM
Reposted by Semanticlemur
'The resulting “loss of autonomy and dignity for lesbians” ...part of the court’s reasoning is one of the most significant elements of this judgment. Resistance to trans ... rights activism from lesbian and gay groups has been alternately dismissed and denounced.'
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
At last, a moment of clarity – the UK supreme court has upheld the rights of women | Susanna Rustin
It is vital that we give credit to the tireless campaigners who brought us to this point, says Guardian writer Susanna Rustin
www.theguardian.com
April 29, 2025 at 7:01 AM