Jack Metzler (cleaned up)
@scotusplaces.bsky.social
"Making statements with undertones of superior legal thinking."
Reporter of Decisions, Court of History.
Judicial review is a thing.™
Good behavior lol
Reporter of Decisions, Court of History.
Judicial review is a thing.™
Good behavior lol
and don't forget a chocolate pie and what about pizza pie
November 27, 2025 at 8:09 PM
and don't forget a chocolate pie and what about pizza pie
next level
November 27, 2025 at 5:46 PM
next level
breed standard=chonk
November 27, 2025 at 5:17 PM
breed standard=chonk
You know a couple of years ago I heard "stand up" as a verb for organizing something and I refused to believe it was a legitimate term and I think that was the last time I ever needed to learn a new term tyvm i am good
November 25, 2025 at 6:00 PM
You know a couple of years ago I heard "stand up" as a verb for organizing something and I refused to believe it was a legitimate term and I think that was the last time I ever needed to learn a new term tyvm i am good
your pic came out much better than mine ( there's a fox in this pic I promise)
November 25, 2025 at 12:00 AM
your pic came out much better than mine ( there's a fox in this pic I promise)
I don't know Joe maybe the client wants a highly arrogant attorney who will insult the justices
November 22, 2025 at 7:49 PM
I don't know Joe maybe the client wants a highly arrogant attorney who will insult the justices
Ordinary people don't really want to go to court. Also they mostly aren't trying to cheat you they are just lame and the summons can give them the motivation to get over their lameness
November 21, 2025 at 3:14 PM
Ordinary people don't really want to go to court. Also they mostly aren't trying to cheat you they are just lame and the summons can give them the motivation to get over their lameness
I've always thought the reason it's a No-No for attorneys is because the magistrate judges are probably pretty touchy about the fact that they are judges. for journalists probably doesn't matter.
November 20, 2025 at 3:46 AM
I've always thought the reason it's a No-No for attorneys is because the magistrate judges are probably pretty touchy about the fact that they are judges. for journalists probably doesn't matter.
since 1990 they have been called Magistrate Judges rather than magistrates to make clear that it is a judicial role, similar to other non-article III judges like bankruptcy judges.
November 20, 2025 at 3:43 AM
since 1990 they have been called Magistrate Judges rather than magistrates to make clear that it is a judicial role, similar to other non-article III judges like bankruptcy judges.
Perhaps we need another new parenthetical: (cringe)
November 19, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Perhaps we need another new parenthetical: (cringe)
The whole thing is embarrassing.
November 19, 2025 at 10:24 PM
The whole thing is embarrassing.
Matthew you are on a lawyer on social media which by definition is expertise on this and whatever else we are talking about today or any other day
November 19, 2025 at 10:11 PM
Matthew you are on a lawyer on social media which by definition is expertise on this and whatever else we are talking about today or any other day
(indictment modified)
November 19, 2025 at 6:01 PM
(indictment modified)
important point. hard to say how that one falls
November 19, 2025 at 6:00 PM
important point. hard to say how that one falls
I am just asking questions
November 19, 2025 at 4:47 PM
I am just asking questions