Agree. They’ve reframed the shipment of narcotics to the U.S. as a hostile act, legitimizing the use of force. With few exceptions, the rest of the world does not share that view. Even if state actors support it, it remains a criminal activity that warrants arrest and prosecution, not execution.

A few folks had better get their European vacations planned before Interpol has their arrest warrants in hand. 🚨

The commander and those carrying out the order won't be judged on theory. They'll be judged on the reality that they no longer posed an immediate threat at sea and ceased to be legitimate targets. In theory, they would be judged for such a criminal act and held accountable.

As very young officers, we were taught about the responsibility that comes with the authorities transmitted down to us. Responsibility comes with accountability. Authorization to shoot survivors would have meant complicity in a war crime. If true, then accountability must come for everyone involved.

Even as the greenest of green officers, we were taught the basics of the Geneva and Hague Conventions, the Law of Armed Conflict, what wrong looks like, and what right sounds like. When a combatant becomes essentially defenseless, they are no longer a legitimate target. Killing them is a war crime.

Bundling Presidential campaign donations usually nets you an ambassadorship somewhere, regardless of party. It’s the American way.

Coulda been someone extraordinary plenipotentiary.

It’s unfortunate that the line of succession is a chain gang of malign actors. There is no Jerry Ford today.

Udvar-Hazy updates and adds regularly so it’s probably a richer experience now. I’m a Dulles frequent flyer and always find new things on each visit.

Recommend sheltering in place during this time of crisis. Locate the room with the greatest number of books and sit tight until the "all clear" has been given by your local civil defence authority.