Sarah Bendall
banner
sarahabendall.bsky.social
Sarah Bendall
@sarahabendall.bsky.social
Material Culture & Gender Historian | Trade, Production & Consumption of Fashion, 1500-1800 | Recreation & Making |📖 Shaping Femininity (Bloomsbury) | Co-I AHRC Making Historical Dress Network | 👩🏻‍🏫Senior Lecturer | sarahabendall.com
I shall keep an eye out on Tuesday ☺️
November 9, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Bloomsbury academic has uk, USA, Canada, AU/NZ websites & shipping. It doesn’t ship to mainland Europe/Asia. Unless ppl ask local bookstores to stock it (unlikely given it’s not a popular history book), yes it’s a lot of ppls only option. This is what I’ve been directly told by European readers
November 9, 2025 at 1:18 PM
Yay!! Can’t wait to read it!
November 9, 2025 at 12:59 PM
😂
November 6, 2025 at 11:41 AM
Authors not receiving enough free copies of their books has a long history I see!! 😅
November 6, 2025 at 9:51 AM
Well that’s the thing right, scholarship moves on and we all make mistakes / misinterpret things based on evidence we had at the time. At some point it does need to be corrected! Really looking forward to reading your book!
November 6, 2025 at 12:00 AM
Hahaha exactly!!
November 5, 2025 at 12:52 PM
Don’t be worried! It’s widely accepted by dress historians that by 1600 English sumpt laws were ignored. The fact that they a) had to remind ppl of them so often tells us they weren’t following & b) the anxieties about dress in literary texts reflects the fact that ppl were doing what they wanted
November 5, 2025 at 12:50 PM
No worries!
November 5, 2025 at 10:13 AM
I know there’s been work done on dress in the Jamestown colony for the living history museum that’s there too which might also be useful given that you’re dealing with English colonies of the early 17thc

youtu.be/M-FLo4374PI?...
Going to the Source | Historical Clothing
YouTube video by JYF Museums
youtu.be
November 5, 2025 at 7:29 AM
And garments were not restricted to certain classes - so a doublet is a doublet regardless of if it’s the king or a merchant wearing it. It’s usually fabrics and trims, as well as how up to date with fashions (usually coming from the continent) the construction/style is that indicate status.
4/4
November 5, 2025 at 7:20 AM
You could use these resources in addition to those that go over more elite dress to get an idea of what garments were worn and what they would have looked like.
In England, sumptuary legislation was rarely followed or enforced (and certainly by the reign of James I was pretty much forgotten)
3/4
November 5, 2025 at 7:20 AM
Clothing of the Common sorts (which does also cover middling and lower gentry) by Margaret Spufford and Susan Mee is also a really invaluable resource and also based on probate records:

books.google.com.au/books/about/...

2/4
The Clothing of the Common Sort
"Most histories of costume in early modern Britain concentrate on the clothing of the social elite--on the silks and embroidery worn by courtiers, aristocrats, performers, the metropolitan rich. These...
books.google.com.au
November 5, 2025 at 7:20 AM
I think someone has already mentioned the Tudor Tailors, but their new book gives really thorough breakdowns of clothing worn in that era based off probate data:

www.tudortailor.com/the-typical-...

1/4
The Tudor Tailor | Reconstructing 16th Century Dress
www.tudortailor.com
November 5, 2025 at 7:20 AM
Susan Vincent’s Dressing the Elite has a good overview of styles for men and women, and Aileen Ribeiro’s Fashion and Fiction is also great. Maria Hayward’s Stuart style also good for elite dress.
What social sorts are you interested in?
November 4, 2025 at 9:57 PM