Same here. Solidarity.

I advocate for anyone not to have their land lives and homes stolen. The problem we have in the case of this land is that two groups think it’s theirs. That has to be faced up to and addressed via compromise and mutual coexistence.

This seems to be a combination of ‘it’s only one person and it’s not antisemitic’ and ‘here’s a completely unrelated wrong to argue about’. I’ve no answer to that.

No I’m expressing a view as to what I think the priority should be.

Why do you want to argue about the nature of a Jewish state, when the priority right now is to aid unity and solidarity in the UK?

All involved in the public realm have a responsibility to lower the temperature (by which I mean lessen polarisation and division) in the aftermath of an antisemitic terror attack in the UK.

What are you doing to lower the temperature and reduce polatisation Owen? If you can’t do that then just stay quiet. I speak as a British Jew who is simultaneously appalled by israeli conduct, and supportive of both the Palestinian cause and the need for a Jewish state.

I’m saying don’t extrapolate from ‘llms can’t do complex algorithmic problems very well’ to ‘all ai is nonsense’. Marcus himself rightly makes that point

he is quite rightly saying ‘What the Apple paper shows, most fundamentally, regardless of how you define AGI, is that LLMs are no substitute for good well-specified conventional algorithms.’ I’d say they are better at humanities than sciences. still a big deal but won’t get us directly to agi!

Sorry but this is just poor journalism seeking to amplify one (genuinely interesting) piece of research into attempted ai methods, and then extrapolation into generalised condemnation of AI.