Paul Sandham
@sandypuke.bsky.social
Having been accused of being ‘virtually anonymous’ by a respondent accusing me of making Twitter arguments (🤷♂️):
I’m a retired hospital pharmacist in Yorkshire. My wife was a GP so we think we have a little insight into health care.
Probably a bit woke.
I’m a retired hospital pharmacist in Yorkshire. My wife was a GP so we think we have a little insight into health care.
Probably a bit woke.
I think we’re 2nd, closest to France - a little ahead - but some way behind Germany
Does that help?
Does that help?
October 16, 2025 at 6:21 AM
I think we’re 2nd, closest to France - a little ahead - but some way behind Germany
Does that help?
Does that help?
This is the ‘offensive’ tweet that the right wing press/current Reform Party spokespersons like to tell everyone about.
On a scale of 1-10 in the context of today’s climate of ‘protection of freedom of speech’ how far past one would you score this for a) offensiveness and b) hypocritical response?
On a scale of 1-10 in the context of today’s climate of ‘protection of freedom of speech’ how far past one would you score this for a) offensiveness and b) hypocritical response?
October 14, 2025 at 8:47 PM
This is the ‘offensive’ tweet that the right wing press/current Reform Party spokespersons like to tell everyone about.
On a scale of 1-10 in the context of today’s climate of ‘protection of freedom of speech’ how far past one would you score this for a) offensiveness and b) hypocritical response?
On a scale of 1-10 in the context of today’s climate of ‘protection of freedom of speech’ how far past one would you score this for a) offensiveness and b) hypocritical response?
Sometimes, on Social Media people get overexcited at the quirks of Socisl Media
October 13, 2025 at 6:44 AM
Sometimes, on Social Media people get overexcited at the quirks of Socisl Media
A vocal critic of green energy?
August 15, 2025 at 7:16 AM
A vocal critic of green energy?
I’ll take this as a ‘no’ should I:
July 23, 2025 at 12:47 PM
I’ll take this as a ‘no’ should I:
I took the liberty of looking this case up somewhere other than the Mail. This extract is from The Standard:
I wouldn’t suggest this activity was entirely unprovoked. Or necessarily ’male patterned’
Would you?
I wouldn’t suggest this activity was entirely unprovoked. Or necessarily ’male patterned’
Would you?
April 28, 2025 at 2:04 PM
I took the liberty of looking this case up somewhere other than the Mail. This extract is from The Standard:
I wouldn’t suggest this activity was entirely unprovoked. Or necessarily ’male patterned’
Would you?
I wouldn’t suggest this activity was entirely unprovoked. Or necessarily ’male patterned’
Would you?
MAGA Caps now available in special ‘USA is winning again’ sale at an *EXCLUSIVE* discount of +1.45 x original marked price.
Buy now while stocks laugh, sorry, last.
Buy now while stocks laugh, sorry, last.
April 11, 2025 at 9:09 AM
MAGA Caps now available in special ‘USA is winning again’ sale at an *EXCLUSIVE* discount of +1.45 x original marked price.
Buy now while stocks laugh, sorry, last.
Buy now while stocks laugh, sorry, last.
It feels that way but maybe that’s just perception?
But even if true, this gives the discerning amongst the public more time to spot the flaws in his stories.
But even if true, this gives the discerning amongst the public more time to spot the flaws in his stories.
February 5, 2025 at 10:48 AM
It feels that way but maybe that’s just perception?
But even if true, this gives the discerning amongst the public more time to spot the flaws in his stories.
But even if true, this gives the discerning amongst the public more time to spot the flaws in his stories.
I don’t think this is unique, though:
December 3, 2024 at 9:59 AM
I don’t think this is unique, though: