Opinions are my own.
It is a structure optimised for the Defence of Australia doctrine.
It is a structure optimised for the Defence of Australia doctrine.
Anyway, it's still a deadly formation... on paper.
Anyway, it's still a deadly formation... on paper.
Imagine you set sail with the intent to fight as a full battlegroup, hoping to deploy to the Philipines or Okinawa.
Imagine you set sail with the intent to fight as a full battlegroup, hoping to deploy to the Philipines or Okinawa.
The first big limitation/question is, can the PLA keep these in the fight? A lot of vehicles have to be sustained. Yes, the hull commonality of the ZBD05 IFV helps, but it still requires a lot of man-hours; you'd know that if you stopped bullying your local RAME person - they need love, too.
The first big limitation/question is, can the PLA keep these in the fight? A lot of vehicles have to be sustained. Yes, the hull commonality of the ZBD05 IFV helps, but it still requires a lot of man-hours; you'd know that if you stopped bullying your local RAME person - they need love, too.
Now, at face value, this is a lot of firepower. However, scratching the surface, it has some severe limitations.
Now, at face value, this is a lot of firepower. However, scratching the surface, it has some severe limitations.
…guess I'll have to do an ORBAT soon.
…guess I'll have to do an ORBAT soon.
It would face its first test during INTERFET.
It would face its first test during INTERFET.
Since this is a fictitious force structure, let me explain the units I've created. I've started by copying a practice you can see in many French formations; I've pulled the RSS & DFSW platoons from both infantry battalions to form a deep-strike combat team.
Since this is a fictitious force structure, let me explain the units I've created. I've started by copying a practice you can see in many French formations; I've pulled the RSS & DFSW platoons from both infantry battalions to form a deep-strike combat team.