Rohan Singhvi
@rohansinghvi.bsky.social
Mostly here for FPL content. But also hoping to find a source of semi-reliable news of the world.
I’m putting 10 in all given no keeper but:
1) Dango+Salah+Hall on bench, rolling 1 FT
2) Munoz+Salah+Hall bench, no FT, but I have Kluivert over a 4th def + Munoz in place for 30.
3) no Haaland, rolling 1 FT, Isak+Salah+Hall bench
1) Dango+Salah+Hall on bench, rolling 1 FT
2) Munoz+Salah+Hall bench, no FT, but I have Kluivert over a 4th def + Munoz in place for 30.
3) no Haaland, rolling 1 FT, Isak+Salah+Hall bench
March 15, 2025 at 11:02 AM
I’m putting 10 in all given no keeper but:
1) Dango+Salah+Hall on bench, rolling 1 FT
2) Munoz+Salah+Hall bench, no FT, but I have Kluivert over a 4th def + Munoz in place for 30.
3) no Haaland, rolling 1 FT, Isak+Salah+Hall bench
1) Dango+Salah+Hall on bench, rolling 1 FT
2) Munoz+Salah+Hall bench, no FT, but I have Kluivert over a 4th def + Munoz in place for 30.
3) no Haaland, rolling 1 FT, Isak+Salah+Hall bench
My FPL CC exposure has largely ended up being this video now. Could really use your insights:
I’m thinking (not making a GK trf):
1) Isak to Haaland, Trent to Gvardiol (or others), roll the third FT
2) Isak to Haaland, Dango to Kluivert, Trent to Munoz
3) Dango to Bruno, Trent to Gvardiol
I’m thinking (not making a GK trf):
1) Isak to Haaland, Trent to Gvardiol (or others), roll the third FT
2) Isak to Haaland, Dango to Kluivert, Trent to Munoz
3) Dango to Bruno, Trent to Gvardiol
March 15, 2025 at 9:41 AM
My FPL CC exposure has largely ended up being this video now. Could really use your insights:
I’m thinking (not making a GK trf):
1) Isak to Haaland, Trent to Gvardiol (or others), roll the third FT
2) Isak to Haaland, Dango to Kluivert, Trent to Munoz
3) Dango to Bruno, Trent to Gvardiol
I’m thinking (not making a GK trf):
1) Isak to Haaland, Trent to Gvardiol (or others), roll the third FT
2) Isak to Haaland, Dango to Kluivert, Trent to Munoz
3) Dango to Bruno, Trent to Gvardiol
Wow, enjoying this sort of aggressive-with-transfers phase you’re in. JP is really an issue cropped up rather unnecessarily. Question for you: I have Amad+Rogers. Is Amad to BOU mid the move this week or can I wait till next week and lose Rogers instead? (LR was bullish on pod re: Amad too)
February 14, 2025 at 2:23 AM
Wow, enjoying this sort of aggressive-with-transfers phase you’re in. JP is really an issue cropped up rather unnecessarily. Question for you: I have Amad+Rogers. Is Amad to BOU mid the move this week or can I wait till next week and lose Rogers instead? (LR was bullish on pod re: Amad too)
Unless Trent is captained massively, their collective EO is 50-60% depending on your rank tier, so I think definitely hope they keep a CS.
(Will obviously be a different story next week with DGW)
(Will obviously be a different story next week with DGW)
January 25, 2025 at 9:53 AM
Unless Trent is captained massively, their collective EO is 50-60% depending on your rank tier, so I think definitely hope they keep a CS.
(Will obviously be a different story next week with DGW)
(Will obviously be a different story next week with DGW)
Obviously outcome-based, but good call @pras-fpl.bsky.social !
January 15, 2025 at 4:22 AM
Obviously outcome-based, but good call @pras-fpl.bsky.social !
Yep! Just feel bad missing out on Gordon who I actually had over Isak originally but rage-transferred out on a mindless Saturday night.
LIV mid probably not ideal given they have the Cup semi and FA cup game between the two DGW fixtures? Boomo maybe.
LIV mid probably not ideal given they have the Cup semi and FA cup game between the two DGW fixtures? Boomo maybe.
January 13, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Yep! Just feel bad missing out on Gordon who I actually had over Isak originally but rage-transferred out on a mindless Saturday night.
LIV mid probably not ideal given they have the Cup semi and FA cup game between the two DGW fixtures? Boomo maybe.
LIV mid probably not ideal given they have the Cup semi and FA cup game between the two DGW fixtures? Boomo maybe.
Cheers Pras! While I can only be very envious of the team you’ve built over time, I was hoping to get your input on this:
Your point about not making changes we don’t have to makes sense. But I have Foden. Would you hold him or just go to Gordon(or Eze because I don’t have Palace attack) instead?
Your point about not making changes we don’t have to makes sense. But I have Foden. Would you hold him or just go to Gordon(or Eze because I don’t have Palace attack) instead?
January 13, 2025 at 3:27 PM
Cheers Pras! While I can only be very envious of the team you’ve built over time, I was hoping to get your input on this:
Your point about not making changes we don’t have to makes sense. But I have Foden. Would you hold him or just go to Gordon(or Eze because I don’t have Palace attack) instead?
Your point about not making changes we don’t have to makes sense. But I have Foden. Would you hold him or just go to Gordon(or Eze because I don’t have Palace attack) instead?
For a one-week punt, I’d definitely have Bowen as a consideration. Paqueta suspension nails him to pens as well.
December 26, 2024 at 6:26 AM
For a one-week punt, I’d definitely have Bowen as a consideration. Paqueta suspension nails him to pens as well.
Yeah, I think I’m okay with FOMO for this week (16), but next week, when I anyways intended to think about Gordon alternatives, a 2 FT move to Isak seems easy, but possibly a good time to look at Jackson instead, who is 0.5 cheaper.
December 21, 2024 at 6:48 AM
Yeah, I think I’m okay with FOMO for this week (16), but next week, when I anyways intended to think about Gordon alternatives, a 2 FT move to Isak seems easy, but possibly a good time to look at Jackson instead, who is 0.5 cheaper.
Really enjoying the path-driven analysis and possibilities.
I made a (stupid) gut call to go Gordon over Isak for 16-17 and given your inclination to bring in Isak (or Jackson) no matter what, do you think downgrading Gordon to fund Isak is worth it? Or..I’ve made my bed with Gordon now?
I made a (stupid) gut call to go Gordon over Isak for 16-17 and given your inclination to bring in Isak (or Jackson) no matter what, do you think downgrading Gordon to fund Isak is worth it? Or..I’ve made my bed with Gordon now?
December 20, 2024 at 6:46 PM
Really enjoying the path-driven analysis and possibilities.
I made a (stupid) gut call to go Gordon over Isak for 16-17 and given your inclination to bring in Isak (or Jackson) no matter what, do you think downgrading Gordon to fund Isak is worth it? Or..I’ve made my bed with Gordon now?
I made a (stupid) gut call to go Gordon over Isak for 16-17 and given your inclination to bring in Isak (or Jackson) no matter what, do you think downgrading Gordon to fund Isak is worth it? Or..I’ve made my bed with Gordon now?
I like the mystery chip. Because there doesn’t seem to be an “optimal” time or way to play it. It is chip strategy AND risk appetite dependent and you get to be a bit creative about it too. Can sound a bit complex initially so maybe @officialfpl.bsky.social need to be better with messaging.
December 12, 2024 at 4:05 AM
I like the mystery chip. Because there doesn’t seem to be an “optimal” time or way to play it. It is chip strategy AND risk appetite dependent and you get to be a bit creative about it too. Can sound a bit complex initially so maybe @officialfpl.bsky.social need to be better with messaging.
Thanks a bunch for the response! I’ve got a gut feeling about Gordon so I need to assess how much I want to pursue that vs what literally everyone seems to recommend.
December 6, 2024 at 10:33 AM
Thanks a bunch for the response! I’ve got a gut feeling about Gordon so I need to assess how much I want to pursue that vs what literally everyone seems to recommend.
Thanks Pras! Great content as always. I’ve boiled my 2 FTs down to: Isak+Timber(for Wood+crappy def) vs Gordon+Trent (for Boomo+crappy def). On the main pod, you spoke about how much of a jump Isak is over “lesser” forwards vs Trent over Timber. Any thoughts on Gordon vs Isak in that context?
December 6, 2024 at 12:41 AM
Thanks Pras! Great content as always. I’ve boiled my 2 FTs down to: Isak+Timber(for Wood+crappy def) vs Gordon+Trent (for Boomo+crappy def). On the main pod, you spoke about how much of a jump Isak is over “lesser” forwards vs Trent over Timber. Any thoughts on Gordon vs Isak in that context?
Thanks for replying. I guess we’re having a different conversation after that game though 😂 now I’m thinking I should start Wood.
December 1, 2024 at 6:32 PM
Thanks for replying. I guess we’re having a different conversation after that game though 😂 now I’m thinking I should start Wood.
Thanks Luke! I know it’s early, but I’m in the market for a Mbeumo replacement (as others might be) and I feel like if there is proof tonight that City can be trusted again, then it’s a good time to jump given fixtures. Any indication that KdB will start to start more? Or its all fixture dependent?
December 1, 2024 at 10:41 AM
Thanks Luke! I know it’s early, but I’m in the market for a Mbeumo replacement (as others might be) and I feel like if there is proof tonight that City can be trusted again, then it’s a good time to jump given fixtures. Any indication that KdB will start to start more? Or its all fixture dependent?
Rogers on the bench too, yes.
November 29, 2024 at 4:27 PM
Rogers on the bench too, yes.
Yeah, I like that too. I think Timber vs Raya is risk-appetite based. Timber could attack but also be benched for an odd game where Partey starts or something..
November 21, 2024 at 5:03 PM
Yeah, I like that too. I think Timber vs Raya is risk-appetite based. Timber could attack but also be benched for an odd game where Partey starts or something..
Thanks! Yeah, I stand by my original call. Raya+Colwill/VH.
November 21, 2024 at 4:51 PM
Thanks! Yeah, I stand by my original call. Raya+Colwill/VH.
Raya+Van Hecke/Colwill. Could do RAN/Robinson/Digne/Hall too but I don’t know the rest of your team to see if they rotate well with the rest of your def.
November 21, 2024 at 3:51 PM
Raya+Van Hecke/Colwill. Could do RAN/Robinson/Digne/Hall too but I don’t know the rest of your team to see if they rotate well with the rest of your def.
I’m not far from this, but it does tie you away from being able to get Saka or a good second striker like Isak, right?
November 16, 2024 at 4:32 PM
I’m not far from this, but it does tie you away from being able to get Saka or a good second striker like Isak, right?
All Out Attack chip from 2016!
November 14, 2024 at 6:51 PM
All Out Attack chip from 2016!
Hi Carole, big fan. You’re wrong because Twitter is not a user’s territory to cede. Leaving twitter means Musk gets to do what he wants (as he would do in any case) to people who want it to be done to them while at the same time sparing the departing users more toxicity on the platform.
November 14, 2024 at 6:23 PM
Hi Carole, big fan. You’re wrong because Twitter is not a user’s territory to cede. Leaving twitter means Musk gets to do what he wants (as he would do in any case) to people who want it to be done to them while at the same time sparing the departing users more toxicity on the platform.