Rohan Padhye
@rohan.padhye.org
Computer Science professor at CMU. Doing research on automated software testing and bug finding. https://rohan.padhye.org
My current conjecture is that the examples of broken JSON syntax in the paper somehow accidentally caused something like second-order prompt injection in Google Scholar's indexing pipeline. But there's only one way to find out ^^^
July 14, 2025 at 5:37 PM
My current conjecture is that the examples of broken JSON syntax in the paper somehow accidentally caused something like second-order prompt injection in Google Scholar's indexing pipeline. But there's only one way to find out ^^^
Hilarious! It looks like Google Scholar is pulling citations for a different Kirschner et al. paper from 2006.
I wonder if one could use the technique proposed in "Debugging inputs" to identify what causes this anomaly. Gonna need Lukas to publish a *lot* of papers.
I wonder if one could use the technique proposed in "Debugging inputs" to identify what causes this anomaly. Gonna need Lukas to publish a *lot* of papers.
July 14, 2025 at 5:33 PM
Hilarious! It looks like Google Scholar is pulling citations for a different Kirschner et al. paper from 2006.
I wonder if one could use the technique proposed in "Debugging inputs" to identify what causes this anomaly. Gonna need Lukas to publish a *lot* of papers.
I wonder if one could use the technique proposed in "Debugging inputs" to identify what causes this anomaly. Gonna need Lukas to publish a *lot* of papers.
The limit applies to references too? Preposterous!
June 17, 2025 at 5:24 PM
The limit applies to references too? Preposterous!
We also have an excellent program of research talks and *fuzzing nuggets*. Detailed schedule coming soon.
conf.researchr.org/home/issta-2...
conf.researchr.org/home/issta-2...
May 27, 2025 at 6:49 PM
We also have an excellent program of research talks and *fuzzing nuggets*. Detailed schedule coming soon.
conf.researchr.org/home/issta-2...
conf.researchr.org/home/issta-2...
It's always been a "response" for me.
The only time it was a "rebuttal" was when I explicitly thanked Reviewers A, C, and D for their valuable feedback.
The only time it was a "rebuttal" was when I explicitly thanked Reviewers A, C, and D for their valuable feedback.
February 23, 2025 at 1:36 PM
It's always been a "response" for me.
The only time it was a "rebuttal" was when I explicitly thanked Reviewers A, C, and D for their valuable feedback.
The only time it was a "rebuttal" was when I explicitly thanked Reviewers A, C, and D for their valuable feedback.
Cite only the paper title for now, and submit a PDF without embedded fonts. They'll probably tell you to fix it and re-submit in 48 hours. Plenty of time to get an arxiv identifier :-)
December 19, 2024 at 7:34 AM
Cite only the paper title for now, and submit a PDF without embedded fonts. They'll probably tell you to fix it and re-submit in 48 hours. Plenty of time to get an arxiv identifier :-)